Breathin' clean fresh air and lovin' life.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
The BILLYdollarQUESTIONS for the BILLYDollarDISAdeal...
Will anybody w/ a differing opinion than mine step up to directly address the questions head-on?
I provide the list of E1 competitors here...
https://1drv.ms/w/s!Ai0_wRzHeIwugWekzw5fLY0DakL1
Can anybody choose one "WHO", one "WHAT" and the "WHY" in answer to the MAIL.MIL replacement question?
Remember, they are replacing the MSFT Exchange based mail.mil backend email gateway system w/ a COMPLETELY NEW solution.
Again...
If not Bravatek and E1 to replace DISA's MAIL.MIL global 4.5MM active user antiquated, full of holes, MSFT Exchange Server based email system, then WHO/WHAT and WHY???
NEXT!
lns
TenK: Care to tell us your opinion then on...
Given IT's main intent for it is being a primary Microsoft Exchange Server direct replacement...
If not Bravatek and E1 to replace DISA's MAIL.MIL global 4.5MM active user antiquated, full of holes, MSFT Exchange Server based email system, then WHO/WHAT and WHY???
https://1drv.ms/w/s!Ai0_wRzHeIwugWekzw5fLY0DakL1
So far, nobody has been able to provide any real offering to those questions. Just ridicule, doubt and acknowledgement of competition but no educated guesses or serious differing opinions given towards those three key questions of E1 being the selected replacement for mail.mil . Nothing. 'Crickets'.
The BILLYdollarQUESTIONS. Nobody has touched them. Will you?
I understand if you can't or won't.
Really....I do.
lns
War: Yep...a shell that can be used. lns_eom
derek: Thanx! Haha! I didn't scroll down on my phone far enough. Can't get to get a real computer again. Ha
lns
derek: Can you tell me, please, where these are orfinally alerted/advertised/announced? YouTube? Nothing prominent about it on their website or Twitter. Like, it's secret? It was a great update! I like this CEO's style.
lns
I-Glow: If not Bravatek and E1 to replace mail.mil, then who w/ what?
Ridicule is easy. How about a educated guess to the question, not deflection?
lns
I-Glow: If not Bravatek and E1 to replace mail.mil, then who w/ what?
lns
glenn: Well, it ain't 2012 and you're not Tom Cellucci...
THANK GOD!
Ugh, the pessimism...it's rife around here.
Stinks to High Heaven.
Do yourself a favor and read up on what E1 and their direct competitors have to offer the U.S. Federal Govt to future-proof their email gateways and global communications...
https://1drv.ms/w/s!Ai0_wRzHeIwugWekzw5fLY0DakL1
Next!
lns
glenn: DISA said they are replacing mail.mil, currently MSFT Exchange, for a "NEW EMAIL GATEWAY INFRASTRUCTURE".
So, you just simply dismiss and doubt their word and you think they will keep MS Exchange in place even though <1/2 of the INITIAL agencies have been able to comply...since 2011? They can't because they're afraid they'll take down the system. They told us that themselves. That word's in one of the article links I provided. Yet, your guess is they'll keep it anyway. What??? You can't be serious.
It's a simple list of choices there. I gave you the link to the competition comparisons. Did you look it over? If so, not even a guess? If not, why not?
Just more doubt and a shrug? This is your investment. Aren't you curious at all about our direct competitors and who and what E1 is up against?
You invested here because of Ecrypt One. Not DarkPulse. Not CrucialTrak. But, the email software. Now you don't think it can live up to your initial expectations? What do you think it's worth is then?
You do know it's a pretty simple process IanT came up w/ to replace the same system he helped design originally...MS Exchange? And, You do know it was specifically designed to be future-proof via its brilliantly seamless and simple plug-n-play architecture? Got a new blockchain or hashgram or quantum based Cyber security solution? GREAT! Just plug it in. THAT is it's MOST powerful feature.
You don't think it's probable that a support entity would be partnered with by Bravatek to UPGRADE mail.mil by simply installing E1, migrating the user data, etc. and uninstalling MS Exchange? The server hardware can stay. The end clients don't have to be touched. In fact, they probably won't even notice the backend upgrade has taken place.
Like, maybe MSFT themselves to do that support since its THEIR SERVERS and THEY ARE ALREADY THERE IN PLACE able to easily be trained on how to do that?
Like, if the patent gets awarded, a sale of Ecrypt One to MSFT making complete sense for...MSFT...if not right away, down the road?
Third pitch...
lns
glenn: You know what's funny, never, not once, has anybody ever provided a different educated guess, not even a wild-hair-off-the-butt guess or blind-stab at a suggested alternative solution to DISA's woe of having to basically Rip-n-Replace their current email gateway.
I even provide Bravatek's own competitive analysis and still...
(crickets)
So, I pose to you...
If not Bravatek, who?
If not Ecrypt One, what?
It's easy to dismiss and ridicule or doubt but we are talking arguably the single largest email system in the world. It could be easily be a BILLYDollarDISAdeal for one company.
It's not MSFT w/ more of the same. If CSCO, why the secrecy?
Again, more time has past SINCE DISA announced they are replacing MAIL.MIL w/ a "NEW email gateway INFRASTRUCTURE" than is left for them to complete their stated goal. Odd no "official" update or word yet from them on this VERY IMPORTANT project they essentially PROMISED to get done BY THIS COMING JULY to the head of the Senate Intelligence Committee.
It is PRIORITY #1 for them to secure our troops communications around the globe. VITALLY important. You watched that video I linked in my last post. Don't you think THEY (DISA/DoD) should and would lead by example here? Shouldn't they protect their OWN before forcing others to protect themselves (you know, it's for the "greater good" wink wink)
Why is this subject kryptonite for folks here?
Give me your best educated guess and explanation as to why you guessed so-'n-so. Please. Help get this discussion going amongst the board.
DISA's MAIL.MIL REPLACEMENT...
If not Bravatek, WHO??
If not Ecrypt One, WHAT??
Again, the primary competitors and their offerings...
https://1drv.ms/w/s!Ai0_wRzHeIwugWekzw5fLY0DakL1
Thanx in advance for proving us w/ your opinion other than, "I don't know but I can't believe it will be Bravatek'a Ecrypt One".
Something...anything other than dismissal, ridicule or doubt...PLEASE!
A sincere educated guess and explanation would be MOST WELCOMED.
lns
Time for a revisit to the crystal ball...
First, to refresh folks memory of what will soon take place w/ arguably the world's largest single email system, DISA's MAIL.MIL email system, worth the re-read...
https://gizmodo.com/after-criticism-pentagon-will-implement-new-encryption-1796687457
Now, the crystal ball...
keep: NEOM is a symbol. NM,LLC is a company. NeoReader and NeoSphere utilize a portfolio of patents used in the 2D barcode space. YA owns it all.
The NEOM shell is still a viable, restriction-free, MM sponsored ticker as of today. Therefore, FINRA can't and won't be shutting down the stock from trading as MM sponsorship is the ONLY requirement for a stock to trade.
The NEOM shell can therefore be used, if desired, for a reverse merger of some type. It only takes the proper paperwork to be signed and filed and certain monies to be paid to the proper authorities.
NM,LLC today, not only actively promotes NeoReader on Twitter but they are also continually spending the time and money needed to regularly update the NeoReader mobile app.
The NeoReader mobile app continues to actively advertise that the bulk of the patents it relies on are assigned to NeoMedia Technologies, Inc.
Nobody has any clue what YA's plans are with any of the above that they have 100% control over.
That is the story here now, as it stands.
Can't it just be left at that?
It is what it is and it is as I have stated.
Period.
lns
neomamia: Yep, and if wanted, they can complete the required steps to reuse THEIR NEOM shell to take NM, LLC public.
It's not impossible by any means. Some here are too stuck on names and symbols. How easy is it to change a name or stock symbol or company structure?
Very easy.
Nothing is "dead" here as some want to portray things. In fact, quite the opposite...Very much alive.
We all know this. It's funny trying to be convinced the sky is yellow and the sun is blue.
TenK: No, TC wasn't. As I said, that supposed communication was a lie. So, it should not be discussed anymore here as though it was an actual email reply from TC.
It wasn't. It was a fabrication and shilled as real.
Enquire w/ the supposed source to discover the truth.
Reasons communications between TC and posters shares publicly need to be vetted.
lns
TenK: That email was altered. Those were not his words, from TC himself.
Can't believe everything you see or read.
It was a lie.
It was a fabrication.
I didn't before but trust the producer of the material nil now.
lns
BC: Yes, the rub being...Who cares if "NeoMedia" no longer exists? Point is, everything they did before is still being done by "somebody". Again, doesn't matter who. The operation itself never ceased just like it's public trading symbol, NEOM...now a shell.
Shells and public stock symbols behind them can't just get "shut down" by FINRA just because there is no operating entity behind it. It takes the shell losing its MM sponsor to willingly do the job/task of making a market for it for FINRA to "shut it down". It happened that way w/ KEY*, Dr.SS's shell before NH IPO'd. The float for it was all bought up, no more shares to trade because literally nobody was selling and the sponsoring MM pulled their sponsorship due to lack of a product (shares/float) inventory to sell. Their store shelves were empty and they couldn't get any new product so they closed up shop. Not unlike any other business in the world.
In this case, closing up shop consisted of deciding to not make a market for KEY* because there were no more shares left in the float w/ which to make a market with, soooooooo...they simply pulled their sponsorship of KEY* w/ FINRA and only then FINRA shut it down.
So, others can put 2 and 2 together and in combination w/ seeing what's happening w/ another stock, TVO*, which is in a VERY similar situation NOW, and guess what? It's now verified that TVO* IS going to be a fully reporting and operating entity again after it TERMINATED its share registrations w/ the SEC, too, a few years ago.
And we were all told this CAN'T happen. How wrong that notion has always been and how spot on our facts have always been that YES...IF WANTED, NEOM can again someday become SOME/ANY/WHOCARES/DOESN'TMATTER fully reporting and operating entity again.
And, yes...NEOM can do the same as TVO* is doing NOW and come back leaner, meaner, FULLY OPERATING, FULLY REPORTING and PUBLICLY TRADING again still as NEOM/NeoMedia Technologies, Inc. but w/ a much improved business plan, forecast and share structure to begin their public rebirth.
lns
armour: Think it will? PEOPLE!!!...
E1 WAS SPECIFICALLY DESIGNED TO REPLACE MICROSOFT EXCHANGE!!!
It's right there...FIRST PARAGRAPH of the main body of the ECRYPT ONE product details...
cngreen: Based on last time the patent volley was at this same point in the process, next week we could quite possibly see a decision. Granted?
https://portal.uspto.gov/pair/PublicPair
Publication #: 20170063869
The folks in the govt recognize how good the software is and how important the patent grant is. So does the "Smart Money".
boomer: And T-Trades continue to go missing. lns_eom
TenK: Mr. Investment Banker pulled more shares from the O/S yesterday to set aside for the ASR Program "BIG SHORT" again. This time, EVERY SINGLE T-TRADE SHARE! About 25% of the day's volume REMOVED from the chart, therefore, from shares available for people to buy.
Watch, a MONSTER BUYBACK WILL OCCUR, because behind the scenes, it's been gearing up for a while now.
Yes...Time will tell. But, in the meantime, we got the chart providing plenty of clues. A whopper yesterday...
TenK: Mr. Investment Banker pulled more shares from the O/S yesterday to set aside for the ASR Program "BIG SHORT" again. This time, EVERY SINGLE T-TRADE SHARE! About 25% of the day's volume REMOVED from the chart, therefore, from shares available for people to buy.
Watch, a MONSTER BUYBACK WILL OCCUR, because behind the scenes, it's been gearing up for a while now.
Yes...Time will tell. But, in the meantime, we got the chart providing plenty of clues. A whopper yesterday...
25MM+ shares...POOF!! GONE!!!
Not only that...the MM's hinted strongly the "NEED SHARES!" (many "100" prints) AND they also hinted the NEWS(!) ("911") was on the way.
Let's see if their hints carry any weight...
lns
Porter: Yes, T-Trade-alicious WOW is right! This time, none were removed from the O/S today as evidenced by no T-Trade blocks "missing" from the chart.
But, as is most of the time w/ these big T-Trade blocks left in the O/S and shown on the chart, it was HUGE BUY BLOCK.
The T-Trade was a BUY as CLEARLY evidenced by the UPTICK on the ACCUM/DIST indicator. Remember, it's impossible to tell what a transaction really was initiated as (buy or sell) on the Time/Sales daily list. But, that can be discerned on the Acc/Dist chart.
BIG BUY...
lns
TenK: This is ThinkorSwim. This is Etrade Pro. This is whatever one likes. They all work off the same data. This is no issue w/ "my chart provider". BTW, it is TDA. If it were my "chart provider" then "my chart provider"'s chart would not look the same and report the same data as everyone elses. TDA just so happens to go down to the minute if one chooses.
New shares get added to the O/S, what does it look like on paper...the Time/Sales? A transaction. Volume. Old shares get removed from the O/S, what does it look like? A transaction. Volume. The Time/Sales is just record keeping. And, all of the individual daily transaction share totals plus the after hour T-Trade transaction share totals equal the total share volume reported for the day...on the Time/Sales report. Then, it starts over the next day from zero.
In the daily chart they are appended. If, they are there to append and not removed.
lns
More T-Trades NOT reported on the chart again yesterday.
This time, AGAIN, the BULK of the T-Trades simply REMOVED from the daily append...This time almost 9MM!!!
Here, the last minute of the day trade, 100K block, is shown...
And, here, the last T-Trade block of the day is shown, ~3MM...
But, the big block before that was purposefully held back from being reported.
Hmmm...wonder why?
lns
TenK: There has been sustained buying pressure since the cup-n-handle bottom in May as evidenced by the steadiness of the ACCUM/DIST indicator over the 8-9 months in face of MASSIVE dilution.
Somebody just admitted the other day what we've AND more importantly what DO DIRECTLY hinted at when he stated in a FB reply last week about not being able to "trade" BVTK shares but being able to just buy up the float.
BC: Not in SoCO. Behind the times. lns_eom
TenK: You know the 2hr time diff is just time zone...I live in CO, so yes, 2hrs off from ET, per my location.
Have any links to corroborate this "inside/outside/absorbtion" theory of yours?
Again, yesterday, 4MM T-Trades pealed from the chart, not show, removed. Pics below and they are easy to follow. Unfortunately no actual hour/min on this ticket tape (iHubs already reset so had to resort to another site). No matter though, because you can see the LAST few market trades in the last traded minute of the day on the ticket tape, added up, equal the highlighted 13:59 block (2nd pic). Last pic shows the last T-Trade block reported on the ticket tape for the day, 8.9+MM.
But, as you can see, the first T-Trade reported on the ticket tape of 4MM is NOT present in the chart (last pic). Here they are...1,2,3...
So, by your 'inside/outside/absorption' theory, of a T-Trade block being 'absorbed' somehow by earlier market trades then they would not be represented as a T-Trade. And, if they were then all the T-Trade on the ticker tape would be a double count of those shares for the accounting and that wouldn't be an accurate report of the Days volume.
Again, have any links to corroborate this "inside/outside/absorbtion" theory of yours?
We would like to see for ourselves if the truth is being told here.
The screenshots don't lie.
lns
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=138045770
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=138112453
TenK: "Newly issued shares that are sold into the market look no different than existing shares being sold by one person to another."
If that were the case, then all T-Trades - which some falsely claim are always all dilution - would be included the DAILY rolling chart right alongside existing shares being sold by one person to another..
But, FACT IS, they aren't. Happened AGAIN yesterday. A HUGE BLOCK OF T-TRADES...GONE. POOF!! MIA.
This time, it's the 1st T-Trade of ~6.98MM that was deliberately, purposefully removed or withheld from being included w/ the minute-by-minute append of the daily chart stats. Check it out...
Here shows the correct representation of the transaction totals for min 13:58...
And, here shows the last big T-Trade transaction correctly represented w/ to the left of that is the small 25K T-Trade block...
But, no 6.98+MM T-Trade block.
So, explain again the fairytale of how this "absorbsion" of the 6.98+MM T-Trade block took place? The way you described it before would mean that particular T-Trade included in the transaction ticker tape would actually be a double count of shares "absorbed" during the day. Convoluted explanation. Made no sense, really. Try again?
So...what REALLY is being done w/ these DAILY missing T-Trade blocks?
You told us right here last night...
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=138140608
Homebrew: Would you agree that dilution would ADD shares to the O/S and therefore show up on the chart accordingly?
"Accordingly" meaning, the added/converted/diluted NEW shares being CLEARLY displayed on the ROLLING DAILY CHART (down to the minute) showing the minute the conversion was made, how many and the volume behind it. Additionally, that info would REMAIN on the ROLLING DAILY CHART (down to the minute) so for the data to be PROPERLY APPENDED to the rest of the day's transaction so that an ACCURATE chart can be drawn for use by, well, everyone.
We can ALL agree that for a trader, charts are TOOL #1. Without an accurate chart, how could one rely on the picture it paints...the story it tells???
One couldn't.
And, if for some reason, everyday, LARGE T-TRADE transactions were to be REMOVED, HIDDEN, NOT DISPLAYED, and therefore NOT included in the ROLLING DAILY CHART (down to the minute), that would present a BIG PROBLEM for the ENTIRE MARKET because of the obvious innacurracy of the chart's data. AND, this would have an ACCUMLATIVE effect of making EVERYDAY MORE AND MORE SKEWED. Eventually, rendering the chart useless.
AGREE? You should if you don't. The concept is pretty simple. Missing data is bad for accurate record keeping.
So, then, PLEASE explain to us, SINCE YOU claim that the T-trades are 'always' dilution...WHY then, DAILY(!), a LARGE portion of those T-trades CLEARY get unreported or get removed or just go missing and simply disappear??? This doesn't happen everywhere all the time. BUT, it IS w/ BVTK.
Just chalk it up to bad record keeping? No big deal?? Even if it happens DAILY???
Check it out AGAIN from yesterday. This time it was the FIRST T-trade that sent missing at 14:05 which represents ~ 2/3(!) of the total T-trades and ~12+% of the day's total volume.
Here you see it reported on the ticker tape for accounting purposes only...
Here we can see the accuracy of the ticker tape vs. the chart by simply adding up the 13:55 transactions and rounding up to the nearest tens place...
And, here we can CLEARLY SEE the LAST 3MM+ T-trade is included on the ROLLING DAILY CHART (down to the minute) BUT NOT the 2nd to last 7MM+ T-Trade...
And...now, to show how that 7+MM trade transaction still "MIA" as the DAILY 1min chart ROLLS seamlessly right in with today's data being simply added or appended to the data which creates the chart EVERYBODY RELIES ON FOR ACCURRACY...
As you can CLEARLY see, we had a little early pre-market action this morning and that BIG 2nd to last T-trade from yesterday STILL MIA.
Does TDAmeritrade just provide innacurrate charts? Can't be because theirs show the same as any other chart.
So, have any explanations you can offer up for us regarding the DAILY CASE OF THE MISDING T-TRADES?!?!?!?!?
lns
NO R/S! NO R/S!! NO R/S!!! FACTS OF AN ASR Program...
Why Do Firms Undertake Accelerated Share Repurchase Programs?
If one truly believed an R/S is necessary for BVTK to undertake one would sincerely have to believe nothing BVTK tweets, PR's or otherwise communicates w/ shareholders about the numerous inquiries and meetings w/ large equity financiers wanting a piece of Bravatek, is even remotely true. You must believe they are all lies.
That said, did the crowd chanting "R/S" forget about Bravatek's "B-Plan", or, again, they just think it's all lies?
Bravatek's "B-Plan" in summary again for folks to think about...
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=132945365
Reading that over again, it makes one think about current vs. FUTURE VALUATION figures and again...Realizing that Bravatek's new CPA's specialize in VALUATION SERVICES, one MUST ask themselves why that particular expertise might be sought after in THIS CASE.
http://www.dbrookscpa.com/palm-beach-valuation-services1.html
An RS would benefit nobody IN THIS CASE. NOBODY. One MUST take these situations on a CASE-BY-CASE BASIS.
Believing what the company communicated, one obviously sees the IMMENSELY PROFITABLE business PLAN that Bravatek has in front of them.
Being able to understand and grasp the MAGNITUDE of what is really taking shape here, one can surmise that what TC is sharing w/ the multitude of equity investors he's been meeting PRIVATELY with is on such a game-changing level that to NOT structure a share reduction in a way that benefits THE MOST players would be a HUGE disservice to those financing institutions who have kept the operations going for so many years.
If anybody thinks the future could be VERY BRIGHT for BVTK and that given the NEAR TERM FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS IN THE WORKS an R/S would be REMOTELY necessary, or even beneficial for ANY and ALL of BVTK's investors, shareholders, stakeholders and financiers...
...one just needs to take a deep paruse of this white-paper on exactly WHY an ASR program is MOST BENEFICIAL for EVERY party involved and has $BVTK written all over it.
Why Do Firms Undertake Accelerated Share Repurchase Programs?
R/S vs. ASR for BVTK?
It's a big read but after mustering through it and realizing HUGE contracts could be moments away from signing (before Q310Q?) to IMMEDIATELY right-side $BVTK's "upside down" balance sheet to THEN allow the details of the SOON-TO-BE ASR Program commencement to be INCLUDED in this Q310Q, due out in <3wks.
Given these REAL possibilities taking place REAL SOON, can ANYBODY give a CONVINCING argument as to why NOT an ASR for BVTK (And NASDAQ) "sooner than you think"?
LONG & STRONG & LOVIN' THE RIDE!!!
lns
WHAT'S GOING ON HERE? My assesment is this...
1) NeoMedia Technologies, Inc. (NTI) was originally formed in the 90's as a publicly traded company under the symbol: NEOM
2) As time went on and the business grew, to secure debt planned for aquisitions to further grow the company, around 2006 NTI entered into a patent security agreement (PSA) w/ YA (formerly, Cornell) for all the patents. This PSA was restated in the 10/28/13 10Q report.
https://www.otcmarkets.com/edgar/GetFilingHtml?FilingID=9570628.
3) Fast-forwarding to January, 2016...Long after much demise to NTI had taken place and very little growth, a "NOTICE of Security Agreement" was filed w/ the USPTO in January, 2016. This was essentially just an 'FYI' filing as NO ACTION was taken at that time as a result of THIS filing other than letting it publicly be known again, for the record, that the PSA CONTINUES to remain in force.
http://legacy-assignments.uspto.gov/assignments/assignment-pat-37640-208.pdf
4) NTI eventually defaulted on that PSA a few months later on 6/1/16.
https://www.otcmarkets.com/edgar/GetFilingHtml?FilingID=11433099
5) Around this same time, YA had created a private corporate entity who they own and control, NM,LLC (evidence of this is that YA and NM,LLC both list the same exact address as their respective corporate headquarters'). Then, as part of the actions taken by YA against NTI for defaulting on the PSA, in lieu of monetary payment which NTI could not satisfy, YA forced NTI to assign all rights to their entire patent portfio over to NM,LLC a couple months later, on 8/24/16 (again, NM,LLC = YA).
6) As a RESULT OF THAT ACTION, NTI was later RELEASED from the PSA by YA (and YA's previous corp names as well) on 1/23/17 because of NTI's having then satisfied the terms of PSA through assigning 100% of all of their rights to the patents to NM,LLC (again, due to their defaulting on repayment of past debt obligations to YA).
http://legacy-assignments.uspto.gov/assignments/assignment-pat-41469-160.pdf
IMO, the release of NTI from the PSA on 1/23/17 by YA was only that...a release of any further debt obligations to be owed by NTI to YA since all debt owed had been satisfied. At that point, w/ all the debt obligations of NTI owed to YA having been satsfied and NTI being left w/ nothing to survive on, YA essentially set NTI free to, well, "die"....just naturally go out-of-business.
NTI is now "dead" (no longer a legal operating corporate entity) due to failed business ventures entered into by previous CEO's (CF and MC, not LM), and their signing of debt agreements owed to YA to pay for those failed business ventures, way back 10+ years ago.
BUT, "NeoMedia", the BRAND NAME, lives on...
http://www.neom.com
As it currently stands, NM,LLC is now 'dba', "NeoMedia", to simply keep the "NeoMedia" brand going due to its established name recognition is the 2D barcode market.
Was anything of the former NTI left "alive"?
Yes...its NEOM shell*...which, through NTI's PSA default being triggered and acted on, YA now has CUSTODIAL control over.
With the new found CUSTODIAL (only) control YA aquired over NTI's publicly traded shell* stock, NEOM, YA subsequently spent all of the resources necessary to satisfy all of the DTCC's questions and concerns they had concerning NTI's past stock transactions which were still tied to the NEOM shell* stock. As a result, the DTC CHILL was subsequently LIFTED (see stickied** post above for that proof) on the NEOM shell* stock and there are currently NO LONGER any broker trading restrictions on the NEOM shell stock being publicly traded.
* - "shell", since NTI is now out of business due to defaulting on the PSA
** - direct link to proof of NEOM DTC CHILL list removal if post if replaced
WHAT DOES ALL THIS REALLY MEAN FOR THE AVERAGE PENNY STOCK INVESTOR AND/OR TRADER?
It means that NEOM...the MM sponsored, empty, restriction-free and publicly traded stock SHELL is NOW able to be used in a REVERSE MERGER of any sort by YA.
Most likely outcome, IMO, will be YA using its CUSTODIAL controlled NEOM shell to take its own private entity, NM,LLC public via a reverse triangular merger (RTM) and NTI's subsidiary, Qode Services Corp.
It is IMVSHHO, that most of the trading activity we've seen in NEOM over the past six months (and will continue to see) has been YA buying up as much of its own (CUSTODIAL controlled) NEOM shell stock as they can for .0001/share for them to profit from however they best see fit before, during and after they take their privately held NM,LLC (dba, "NeoMedia") public via an upcoming RTM they are planning.
Time will tell how accurate my assessment is.
I hope the above shared analysis provides some insight and understanding to those who have any concern or interest here and are confused or just plain lost as to what the heck is going on w/ everything in this situation.
Best,
lns
driller: Yeah, like that Cellucci dude. lns_eom
havn: Something VERY interesting happened AGAIN yesterday w/ the T-Trades reported...
Again...~1/2 do NOT appear on the ACTUAL, DAILY, ROLLING, share stat calculations...i.e., the technicals...the chart(!). They ONLY appear on the transaction ticker tape for ACCOUNTING PURPOSES ONLY(!). (mic drop)
This lends SERIOUS CREDENCE to the theory I mused about around mid-late summer and MICA MM, others in/out of the L2 lineup...
Executing an ASR is a VERY COORDINATED, well planned out IN ADVANCE, CONTRACTED and COMPLEX BIG MONEY transaction. The biggest aspect of the coordination besides gathering the equity players and the dough together is gathering/allocating/DESIGNATING the shares which are to be re-purchased and REMOVED IMMEDIATELY from the O/S when the ASR Program contract is signed.
If we go by DO's little clue of him, as an insider of BVTK, not being able to TRADE BVTK stock but rather him being able to BUY UP all of the O/S not held by investors (the float)...How would that take place?
It would take place, in my mind, by peeling those shares allocated for removal off the O/S, EVERYDAY-little-by-little. Remember, the shares allocated for removal have to first be CAPTURED, so to speak, before being 'put to sleep' (or, better use ). Otherwise, the MM's might accidentally sell them then those shares couldn't be GUARANTEED to be FREE AND CLEAR of any individual investor's/trader's ownership.
They have to BEFOREHAND, have ALL of the shares allocated for "THE BIG SHORT" ACCOUNTED for IN ADVANCE of being able to execute the ASR transaction.
This is what I mused back then a few months ago that was possibly taking place...the T-Trades PROVEN (simple math) to NOT be all tied to dilution, but in fact, some other transaction.
IMO, that 'other transaction' being the allocation and temporary 'locker storage' of those shares for the purpose of removal from the O/S at a future date via the execution of an ASR program.
I believe that ASR execution time is upon us.
~1/2 the O/S I guesstimate they were able to allocate for buyback via ASR since the summer. Chart shows (ACCUM/DIST) just under 4BB shares are accumulated and held in investors accounts out of the 8BB+ total O/S.
Where is the last big T-Trade?? Hiding???
Boomages on da way, IMVSHHO.
I think the MISSING T-Trades the other day on the chart (same thing, mystery) just so happening to add up exactly to the $30K mentioned in the coinciding 8K release same day tells us the MM's DO hide COMPANY RELATED BUSINESS transactions tied to shares, in T-Trades.
LONG & STONG & LOVIN' THE RIDE!!!
$BVTK
(spread the word. )
BC: Isn't that crazy. Somebody should bring it to their attention and see what they have to say about it, if anything. I am not on FB so can't myself.
lns
boomer: My guess is the 8K is tardy because of something to do w/ additional information being included needing additional time-consuming clearance from the lawyers.
Tick tock...
lns
derek: You proved it. Cellucci full of BS! Haha!! lns_eom
dugie: Blind. lns_eom
jack: They won't. Look into a compartitive stock, TVOG, and try to figure out why they won't and why FINRA as well CAN'T just stop a stock from trading.
See the similarities? What's happened there a few years ago? What are they doing now?
I'd love to read about what you've discovered and learned.
lns
armour: YES...The E1 patent WILL get approved. I'm surprised there has been zero discussion here so far this w/e on the latest response by Bravatek. Time for that to change...
Hojka breaks away w/ a slam-dunk.
For folks' convenience, here is the complete compiled 1/12/18 response:
https://1drv.ms/b/s!Ai0_wRzHeIwugXvO5S0wlMvSowgw
HOJKA HOJKA HOJKA HOJKA!!!!
I think we get it, and quickly this time. I'm calling a serious bet on Patent Grant in less than 2wks(!), by the time HBO's Vice episode hits the air promoting Bravatek, DarkPulse and their many cybersecurity solutions our nation and allies around the world will begin implementing.
Qadeer&Treleavan narrowed the scope/claims purposefully (from ten to six) to get it thru QUICKLY and EASILY and GRANTED this time(!), reserving their right to add the shelved-for-now claims to it at a later date. I'm psyched!
They present very good arguments against the "obviousness" rulings and 'mea culpa' to the examiners first rejection and suggestion and BRILLIANTLY amended the #1 Keystone (independent) Claim (Claim 1) that the rest are dependent on.
The BRILLIANT amendment of Claim 1 is what the rely on to convincingly (IMO) argue against suggestions of obviousness based on "hindsight bias".
It's a homerun, IMO.
Imagine...E1 patent granted then soon to follow the 10Q showing millions in revs then budget resolution and bomb drop of BillyDollarDISAdeal then the ASR announcement immediately following as the chaser. Whew!
It CAN happen. It just takes one (1) large Fed Gov't contract.
Speaking of large federal contracts...
Anybody guess yet or hear any scuttlebutt of who/what will be DISA's "new email gateway infrastructure" to replace their GLOBAL MAIL.MIL email system currently based on old, antiquated, technologically and architecturally limited MS Exchange email server systems which puts our country and troops in serious danger from an email originated cyber-attack??
This is to be "in place by July, 2018". Hmmmm.....
Something's gotta be "officially" awarded soon...real soon. Compare for yourself...
https://1drv.ms/w/s!Ai0_wRzHeIwugWekzw5fLY0DakL1
Looks like it's time for folks to start SHOVELLING those crypto and pot profits BACK INTO $BVTK next week!!
LONG & STRONG & LOVIN' THE RIDE!!!
lns
p.s. - The "new math" for the $2.4MM worth of 100K Preferred shares that can only be sold back to the company(!)...well, FYI...the $24 share price redemption is NOT an "arbitrary" number plucked for no reason out of thin air as some suggest NOR are they Preferred shares solely to protect HelpComm from pps depreciation. That's utter nonsense.
Gettin' some serious whiffs of perspiration drenched desperation fillin' the air. Feeling quite hot in here all of a sudden, eh?
Happy New Year, all!
dhs: Think folks are starting to get it. lns_eom