glenn: DISA said they are replacing mail.mil, currently MSFT Exchange, for a "NEW EMAIL GATEWAY INFRASTRUCTURE".
So, you just simply dismiss and doubt their word and you think they will keep MS Exchange in place even though <1/2 of the INITIAL agencies have been able to comply...since 2011? They can't because they're afraid they'll take down the system. They told us that themselves. That word's in one of the article links I provided. Yet, your guess is they'll keep it anyway. What??? You can't be serious.
It's a simple list of choices there. I gave you the link to the competition comparisons. Did you look it over? If so, not even a guess? If not, why not?
Just more doubt and a shrug? This is your investment. Aren't you curious at all about our direct competitors and who and what E1 is up against?
You invested here because of Ecrypt One. Not DarkPulse. Not CrucialTrak. But, the email software. Now you don't think it can live up to your initial expectations? What do you think it's worth is then?
You do know it's a pretty simple process IanT came up w/ to replace the same system he helped design originally...MS Exchange? And, You do know it was specifically designed to be future-proof via its brilliantly seamless and simple plug-n-play architecture? Got a new blockchain or hashgram or quantum based Cyber security solution? GREAT! Just plug it in. THAT is it's MOST powerful feature.
You don't think it's probable that a support entity would be partnered with by Bravatek to UPGRADE mail.mil by simply installing E1, migrating the user data, etc. and uninstalling MS Exchange? The server hardware can stay. The end clients don't have to be touched. In fact, they probably won't even notice the backend upgrade has taken place.
Like, maybe MSFT themselves to do that support since its THEIR SERVERS and THEY ARE ALREADY THERE IN PLACE able to easily be trained on how to do that?
Like, if the patent gets awarded, a sale of Ecrypt One to MSFT making complete sense for...MSFT...if not right away, down the road?
Third pitch...
lns
