Worldwide NFT Inc (WNFT)

[Yolo]

The point is this: if you violate securities laws and are involved with numerous unscrupulous firms, while dumping tens of millions of dollars of stock into the open market without a registration statement, and then you abandoned shareholders after these events unfolded, without ever proving that you owned the shares in the first place, what makes you think that the Supreme Court of Nevada would look upon these events as something that they should rule in favor of?

You may want to reread the Caledonia case, the underlined is completely untrue. O'Flynn was the one that dumped them without a proper registration statement, not Calasse. O'Flynn filed a fraudulent S1 so it seemed that everything was kosher.

The bold is also untrue. Unlike Sharp, Calasse filed a Form 4 to register his shares. In the eyes of the SEC, he had done everything necessary to prove legal ownership of the shares.