Max Sound Corporation (MAXD)

[uber darthium]

Trammell designed the schematic diagram. He designed the system. As far as I know he is not a “code” guy, as least as I have heard and his AES bio tends to agree. Not withstanding his abilities, “coders” “ programmers” aren’t usually audio guys. The MAXD patent, certainly did not start out as a design based on 1 & 0s. It starts analogue, and ends up analogue

[jay14]

Yes, it's a fact that sounds very familiar....


a board poster with a long history of antagonism toward anyone and everyone connected with MAXD

Opinion, right????

Spreading hearsays throughout from someone,

that also wasn't there,
or another opinion????

What about that phone call with
Greg Halpern
just months ago????

[J Galt]

“This story about the president of Qualcomm and a vice president of AT&T meeting Blaisure in a hotel room in Vegas, and either of them seeing working technology and thus agreeing to commit resources is preposterous.” That is the opinion of a board poster with a long history of antagonism toward anyone and everyone connected with MAXD, which is his prerogative. I’m sure he would admit that fact. But he was not there in the meeting so he would not know what happened. As soon as I saw the thumbs up to the poster on Yahoo, I knew it would appear over here as a response to a post which is hard for Halpern to reply to honestly. Apparently, my response to the post was intentionally ignored as it would have negated the point. Furthermore, the poster is denigrating the MAXD technology, which I guess is acceptable now that Halpern is on the outside looking in.

It would be convenient to discount the story as it is not flattering to Greg Halpern. Far from it. Better to jump on the bandwagon and claim that the story is fictitious. The meeting was set up by Qualcomm, not Blaisure. AT&T was already there for the CES show, as was Qualcomm. The meeting was in a corporate meeting room and not in a hotel room, as claimed. The VP of AT&T was impressed and wanted to go to the next step. Those are all facts. The next step does not mean committing funds or signing contracts, which I never stated. It means “we like what we hear, it has merit, it looks like it could be real, now prove it with the engineering.” That was enough for Vechery to commit the funding to continue.

Halpern was present for the meeting, so he knows what happened. Let me repeat that fact: Halpern attended the meeting. He saw and heard everything and would not be able to "honestly" dispute any of the facts I described from the meeting. Harvey Vechery was at the meeting, and I assume he would testify to the facts as well. Otherwise, why would he have committed another $250k of his own money after the meeting? For that matter, the $250k from Vechery is easily traceable, and the purpose for the funding was contingent on the results of the meeting. There is no getting around the facts. The meeting happened as described. The interest in the technology was real. The business deal didn’t materialize because Halpern didn’t pay the engineers with the money Harvey Vechery committed for that purpose. Those are the facts.

“No doubt this will continue to be one of the story Vechery repeats to try to trick more suckers into buying his MAXD shares.” This was another quote from the antagonistic board poster on Yahoo. Vechery wasn’t writing this “story,” I was. I have no contact with him. He is not my boss, he is not my stringer, nor is Vechery my editor. No one is pushing shares right now as the company is on the Expert Market and Halpern is no longer involved in fake stock pumping promotions. Should we get back to what happened to the $250k money and stop deflecting? Forensic accounting.

[jay14]

It's now up to Harvey Vechery

to make those decisions....

No longer GH's obligations....

[jay14]

Funny, or factual hearsay with this post as being disputed by another poster,

with this comment....

This story about the president of Qualcomm and a vice president of AT&T meeting Blaisure in a hotel room in Vegas, and either of them seeing working technology and thus agreeing to commit resources is preposterous


That's what I'm thinking with
no statement,
no contact with the accountant
and
no contact with Delaware registration....

This also seems to be a charade, already six months/ 7 days now,

with this statement from the same disputed post....

No doubt this will continue to be one of the story Vechery repeats to try to trick more suckers into buying his MAXD shares

And what about that phone call with
Greg Halpern
just a few months ago????

[J Galt]

“Trammel didn't understand or couldn't write the code, whereas GH had to get other people to help write the code.... I guess that part was missed in that gibberish of a post....” Why is it that every post countering the talking points of the regime is described as being “gibberish?” Why not just respond, point by point as I do, explaining where I am wrong? I do it with each Halpern post. However, it’s much easier to throw out the misdirection word “gibberish” than to actually respond intelligently and debate the points.

Lloyd Trammell wrote the MAXD code. He is the inventor and applied for all the patents. Those are documented facts. I recall seeing the patent applications online back in the day. He is considered to be the father of the MAXD code.

Halpern is now saying Lloyd didn’t know what he was doing, and Halpern had to get other people to help. The inventor of the code didn’t know what he was doing with the code. But Halpern did. Right. Trammell was no longer there because he didn’t want to work for Halpern, like so many other professionals in the business who dislike Halpern.

Those “other people,” Halpern must be referring to are the engineers Blaisure was working with, who never got paid by Halpern to do the job. Blaisure was managing the programmers and tested the code for MAXD Voice. Halpern was not directly involved because he was too busy being a patent troll and focusing on his war with Google. And how was Trammell involved?

Attempting to deflect blame to Lloyd Trammell, when he was no longer with the company, and had nothing to do with the potential AT&T deal, is classic Halpern. Fantastical, defensive, dishonest, and completely delusional.

[J Galt]

“Trammel couldn’t get it done!!!!” Couldn’t get what done? Why did Lloyd Trammell’s name suddenly enter the discussion? His name wasn’t mentioned in the AT&T post. For that matter, how would this board poster know what Trammell could or couldn’t do? Is he now a sound engineer, as well as a beach barrister? Or are these Halpern’s words transmitted by his conduit through another one of those personal emails?

Lloyd Trammel wasn’t with the company during the AT&T demo. He was long gone so he had nothing to do with the Vegas meeting or the code writing at that time, nor was his name mentioned in my post. I guess blaming Blaisure for everything is “so yesterday” so it’s time to find a new target. “He was paid $2 million and was fired for trying to steal the technology....” I’ve never heard the “$2m”number, but my understanding from back then was that Lloyd left the company, on his own free will, after promises about stock were broken by Halpern. Halpern knows what I’m talking about. Also, if Halpern is stating that Lloyd was paid $2 million dollars in his entire time with MAXD, to make it sound like a larger number, then I would ask how much was Halpern paid in all his years with the company? I’ve never heard anything about Trammell being fired and it’s not what I was told back then when he left. Now he is suddenly being accused of attempting to steal the technology. That sounds like more revisionist history. Once again, in Greg Halpern’s world he is always the victim and everyone else is the evildoer.

[grantastic]

Greg Halpern has a real knack for picking losers. Every single person he gives money to "can't get it done"

[jay14]

More disgruntled hearsay.... Trammel couldn't get it done!!!!

$250K IDK, perhaps Lloyd Trammel holds that answer....
He was paid $2 million and was fired for trying to steal the technology....
Trammel didn't understand or couldn't write the code, whereas
GH had to get other people to help write the code....
I guess that part was missed in that gibberish of a post....



Harvey Vechery is in charge now,
but it seems
ex transfer agent ethics
have been tossed out the window too....
Or
still chasing Constance Nash!!!!

Where's the statement from Harvey Vechery
on direction of the company????

FYI
The order does not say Harvey Vechery owns the technology....
The inner workings of the company are sperate from that....

That's also in the filing!!!!

[J Galt]

“Post, and Harvey Vechery's minions reply, with distortion....” Distortion? What kind of unethical and immoral person posts personal family information on a public website? Greg Halpern has a photo of the Vechery house and a link to Google Maps. What is his purpose here? He has also posted about the Vechery divorce separation case from October 2009 with a link. Why? An almost 14-year-old case in a family law court has nothing to do with any business. How is this connected to MAXD? How does Vechery’s personal life concern MAXD shareholders?

Vechery had nothing to do with how the company was run before Halpern was removed and was not responsible for any of the 14 years of Halpern’s failures. He saved the company when he bought out the toxic debt for MAXD, which was a huge help to the company and shareholders, and he loaned money to the company for many years, as well as to Halpern personally. If not for Harvey Vechery, MAXD would more than likely have gone under years ago as he was the only “income” the company had. More to the point, it was the only income Greg Halpern had.

Vechery bailed Halpern out of his personal bankruptcy and kept him out of further trouble by paying off the house debt. His reward for being such a nice guy was to have his personal affairs posted on social media on the Hoodwinkers site. What did Vechery do to deserve this treatment? He finally said no to Greg Halpern’s money demands. In Halpern’s mind, that turned him from a great guy and “angel investor” into the angel of financial death. For Halpern anyway.

Is this all some form of extortion plot? One must wonder. Halpern posts teasers of Vechery’s personal life and then states, “Vechery will be given one documented opportunity to make these things right.” What does that mean? What does “make it right” mean?“ Evidence is there, it's up to Harvey Vechery now or face charges....”" Once again, this sure looks like a veiled threat.

The failure of Greg & the Halpernettes to oppose the facts and truths I’ve posted with any form of counter argument, instead deflecting to their latest agenda, and talking points of the day, should be a clear signal to everyone that they know the information I’ve posted is accurate. I’ve repeatedly asked them to respond to the 8-K Analysis, posted on Yahoo, and not a word. I’ve asked them to respond to individual comments in posts and they have not. I’ve asked them to point out one untruth, and I get Zen Nothingness.

Words are posted with innuendo about the former transfer agent but no links to any SEC charges. Links must be posted if insinuations are made. There are none. Prove me wrong. Comments trashing the former transfer agent are made instead of answering his questions. His real name is posted online by Halpern, which is a breach of the TOS, but it’s posted anyway out of pure spite. The words he is posting are just “disgruntled information,” as per Halpern’s comment. It’s time Greg & the Halpernettes start posting facts and counter arguments instead of crawling into the gutter and posting personal information about those who disagree with them.

[J Galt]

More “factual” information in response to the “let’s blame former CEO Blaisure” comments made by Halpern. The statement made, “John Blaisure was in charge until 2019....Get over it,” is inaccurate. Read the following factual accounting and you will see what I’m referring to.

With a great deal of advance work with the engineering team, Blaisure lined up a meeting with a major telecom provider at the CES show in Las Vegas. The VP of this company was there along with the President of MAXD’s technology partner, Qualcomm. As a matter of fact, Harvey Vechery was also there as an observer and enthusiast of the overall electronics show. The purpose of the meeting was to demo the new MAXD Voice technology and how it could be used to improve the performance of the telecom provider’s own phones. The VP was so impressed with the overall demo, and how MAXD improved the sound clarity on his company phone, that he agreed to get his company engineers engaged with MAXD engineers so “we can move forward ASAP.”

Halpern instructed Blaisure to “go get another $250k from Harvey.” Vechery agreed with Blaisure on the value of the deal to MAXD and transferred the funds to Halpern. Once the money was in the account, on the list to be paid were all the past due fees to the MAXD engineers, which had to be paid before they would engage the telecom company’s engineers. Also, the projected engineering fees to adapt the MAXD technology to the specific telecom provider’s devices needed to be set aside to be paid before they would go to work. All the past due fees for the outside engineering firm, who had been recommended by Qualcomm to help create the MAXD Voice feature, also needed to be paid before the work would commence. In addition, unpaid prior expenses due Blaisure, from his personal credit card, including the CES and Hong Kong shows were agreed to be paid by Halpern.

Halpern never paid anything on the list. Let me repeat that, no one on the list was paid. Where the $250k was spent is still a mystery. Again, another reason for forensic accounting. More important than where the money went, is where it didn’t go.

The engineers didn’t get paid. The technology partner’s outside engineering firm didn’t get paid, and what an embarrassment that was for Blaisure to have to deal with in conversations with Qualcomm. Everyone was angry at Halpern. The deal fell apart because, after John Blaisure had been working for almost eight months with the engineers to prepare the voice technology, and then sold the telecom provider on the MAXD voice technology. MAXD could not perform on the agreement because the engineering work could not be completed. Once again, the work could not be completed because the engineers were not paid.

I’m not sure how MAXD shareholders are supposed to “get over it” when we learn that a major deal with a top player in the technology sector was derailed by Halpern not paying the bills. By the way, the name of the “telecom provider” was AT&T, and the deal would have not only been the first major move for MAXD, but it would also have turned the company around. Of course, I’m sure the financial returns would not have been anywhere near the “plush bunny” level, but it would have been a major step for MAXD in the technology sector. Which is what this company was supposed to be about at its origin. A technology company. That was before Halpern morphed MAXD into a patent troll with the Google lawsuit.

The bottom line is that this is another example of how Blaisure was never “in charge” at MAXD. If he was in charge, the AT&T deal would have taken priority over all else, the engineers would have been paid, and the resulting impact on the share value would have been the financial talk of the town. As was always the case, Halpern was coming over the top and acting as the deal “cooler” for MAXD. Cooling all potential deals by simply being himself. John Blaisure was never in charge and Halpern knows it. Halpern should probably take his own advice and “get over it!”

[jay14]

Right, let's battle words on a message board
and not in court....
Typical nonsense....

Where is the evidence? Post it here online.

Evidence is there!!!!

Charges for what? From whom?

(Charge's)That still needs to be determined
on what Harvey Vechery
decides with his move with the company....
Times ticking away....

Lawsuits from legitimate MAXD shareholders
and
most likely Greg Halpern!!!!

What about the mentioning of Harvey Vechery,
that indicated he was investing in the company and engineering....

Where's that proof,
or statement

Or was that hearsay????


Again
No contact with Greg Halpern,
who holds the property....

No contact with the accountant,
who can show the numbers and deals....

And most importantly,
no contact with Delaware registration,
which is needed to actually move the company forward....

Lastly what about the phone call with
Greg Halpern
that took place a few months back????
That email I recieved mentioned you had a conversation with Greg Halpern but no mention of that....
Truthfulness, right????

[J Galt]

“Evidence is there, it's up to Harvey Vechery now or face charges....” Where is the evidence? Post it here online. I have consistently posted comments without receiving any response other than deflecting blame to others. Why not respond to the evidence I presented in the 8-K Analysis? Why not respond to my breakdown of the Final Order? Why not respond to any of the questions about the mining numbers? Counter my words with your own facts and logic. I could go on but what’s the point? The response will be feigned outraged about the lack of contact from the Vechery team instead of answering direct questions.

By the way, “face charges?” Charges for what? From whom? Is one of the seven faces of Sybil now channeling an imaginary district attorney? Charges can only be filed by a prosecutor. Libel and slander are civil offenses, not criminal. If criminal “charges” are going to be filed, it certainly appears that the man in the mirror would be the top priority. By the way, if lawsuits are to be filed then scary words such as “interrogatories and depositions” come into play. That would be fun. Greg Halpern would have to appear in court. When has that ever happened?

These are nothing more than braggadocios words from a keyboard warrior. One point that needs to be made, to my understanding, Harvey Vechery doesn’t post online. Unlike others. So how can he be accused of being slanderous in any way/ And as I’ve stated, I don’t take orders from anyone when I post. Point out the libel and slander. Or go file charges.

[jay14]

Evidence is there, it's up to Harvey Vechery now or face charges....

To sue for slander and libel there has to be evidence of the offense.

Besides slander and liable,
there has been,
No contact with
Greg Halpern,
who holds the property....

No contact with
the accountant....

No contact with
Delaware registration....

Over six months/seven weeks now,
and
no statement on company....
That statement should of been released
May 1....
No excuses, just Harvey Vechery's minions making noise....

Trammel is gone
and is not coming back,

from what I understand in the filings

Trammel couldn't do anything with the technology
and did has much as he could do....

He was paid $2Million and moved on....

[J Galt]

“Harvey Vechery should be sued for liable and slander from the deals that were lost!!!! YES, there were deals!!!!” Once again, this was the game plan all along. Can’t make money, sue someone for it. Halpern has no money. Harvey has money. Let’s target the guy who has something to lose. That was always the plan.

Claims of “life altering deals” for the shareholders. 50 deals in 50 days. $100m by year end. Beluga cars. Gold currency in Zimbabwe. Deals with native American tribes. Biometric Security. MAXD proprietary Mineral Mapping technology. Quadrillions” of dollars in Mexican gold mines. Mexican land deals in Cabo. Claims of deals in Mexico and Japan. A long list of inglorious non-achievements.

The plan was to play rope a dope and run the clock out. Then claim the deals failed due to Vechery interference and rile up the shareholders for a lawsuit. Where is the libel? Where is the slander? Find it for me. Spell it out. Post it.

For deals to be “lost” there had do be deals to begin with. No LOI or contract for Japan, only words on a paid, unedited, and uncontrolled website. To sue for slander and libel there has to be evidence of the offense. There is none that I can see from Harvey Vechery. On the other hand, the Hoodwinkers website is a treasure trove of both.

[uber darthium]

Are those new MAXD booties that Greg Jessica is wearing in order for our X CEO to reach the pedals ?

Short stupid and ugly has to be a terrible way to go through life


MAXD

[jay14]

More disgruntled information....Guess what;
new leadership....

Where's the statement from Harvey Vechery on the direction of the company????

No contact with the accountant....
NOTHING!!!!

No contact with Delaware registration....
NOTHING!!!!

What about that phone call????

[J Galt]

“Truth is No one has contacted Greg Halpern, who owns the technology.... MAXD, the company has licensing rights to the technology but it's owned by Greg Halpern.... Read the filings!!!!” This sounds like the Connie Nash strategy all over again. Were the signatures on this transaction forged as well?

The technology was purchased by MAXD, the company, from Lloyd Trammell, the inventor, in exchange for stock. I have posted the information direct from the SEC filings in the past. Greg Halpern did not purchase the technology, Max Sound did. As per the Final Order, Harvey Vechery now owns all property belonging to MAXD as he owns the company. I’m sure someone on the Vechery team will be contacting Halpern when they are ready. By the way, please post the specific “filings,” as I did, so we can all see the claim that Halpern owns the technology.

[J Galt]

“Forensic accounting was already done through the Google cases.... Also in the filing....lol Seriously.... “ The Google legal team only looked at two years of bank statements in the deposition in which Blaisure was called to testify. In forensic accounting, the researchers are always looking for specific areas of accounting that relates to their assignment. When they find what they are looking for, they generally close shop and move on.

In the Google deposition case, they were looking for ways to go after Greg Halpern. He had posted videos naming specific Google executives in defamatory ways. They were looking to take him down for it, and they did. They found the evidence of Halpern using corporate cards for personal gain, which allowed them to pierce the corporate veil and get personal judgments against the MAXD officers and company. That was an example of partial forensic accounting.

It’s always good to check out the definition of a word, or phrase, to see if it’s being used correctly. The phrase “forensic accounting” is understood to mean, “a type of accounting that investigates financial information for potential evidence of crimes. Forensic accountants use accounting, auditing, and investigative skills to understand whether a person or company has committed financial misconduct, such as embezzlement or fraud.”

The phrase “financial misconduct” covers a lot of territory and certainly applies to the Halpern years, both at Z-Trim as well as during his tenure as CFO and CEO of MAXD. Far too much money went into the MAXD and related accounts with no real return. MAXD shareholders have a right to an honest accounting.

It’s irrelevant whether Google or the bankruptcy trustee performed any form of forensic accounting as that was about Halpern's personal bankruptcy issues and not specific to the MAXD case. From everything I have read, the Mintz Levin law firm, brought into the case by the trustee, didn’t appear to perform detailed forensic work during the bankruptcy. Was this due to Harvey Vechery stepping in and agreeing to pay all debts for Halpern? That he agreed to pay off the house and additional fees to the lender to prevent further legal action against Halpern for apparently falsifying financial documents? Whatever the reason, a full forensic accounting of MAXD was not performed. It was a personal bankruptcy case for Greg Halpern, not a full forensic accounting of the entirety of MAXD.

The courts are backed up and don’t generally waste time when both parties agree, and the debts are paid. The bottom line is that a complete forensic accounting needs to be done for the entirety of the MAXD years. If Halpern has nothing to worry about, why debate this point? Allow it to happen so we all know the truth.

[jay14]

All statements that you want me to reply to
are bias because of the deal between a friend(your friend)
and Constance Nash,

And

here's the funny part,

Greg Halpern
had nothing to do with that deal
from what I was told....
FYI
I don't care!!!!

This is old news, posted on these message boards
years ago
that,
that deal was between you( a friend) and Constance Nash,

not Greg Halpern....


He had never ever heard of you
until after those shares where traded off
or
sold to that friend that was duped!!!!

Besides,
in that email I recieved from Greg Halpern,
he indicated that you two spoke just a few months ago(phone),

if this is true,

why haven't you said anything about that????

Deja Vu,
Glendale Holdings is now getting involved all-over, again....

That won't end well!!!!

It's a done deal,
Harvey Vechery is now new leadership,

and
it's time for him to come forward
with a statement on the direction and plan of the company
or
this whole thing was a charade!!!!
If it was a farce,
a charade, IMO
Harvey Vechery should be sued for liable and slander
from the deals that were lost!!!!


YES,
there were deals!!!!

[jay14]

Dissecting Turner,
is not being truthful....


Truth is
No one has contacted
Greg Halpern,
who owns the technology....

MAXD, the company has licensing rights to the technology
but
it's owned by Greg Halpern....
Read the filings!!!!

Harvey Vechery has done NOTHING with the accountant!!!!

NOTHING!!!!

And

Harvey Vechery has done NOTHING with the registration in Delaware!!!!

NOTHING!!!!

Where's the statement from new leadership
and direction of the company,
which should of been released May 1!!!!

[J Galt]

The statement made was, "What a bunch of nonsense from Harvey Vechery's minion...."

“Nonsense” is defined as “spoken or written words that have no meaning or make no sense.” All of my words have meaning and make sense. If there are words that don’t fit those categories, please point them out. Respond to them with more than more “Zen Nothingness.”

“Minion” is defined as “a follower or underling of a powerful person, especially a servile or unimportant one.” I have never been servile to anyone on earth, powerful or not. I don’t serve Harvey Vechery, therefor I can’t be a minion. Furthermore, in order to be a “minion,” I would have to have met Harvey Vechery. Never happened. Be in contact with him. Never happened. Be taking instructions from him. Never happened. As I have repeatedly stated, I don’t take marching orders from anyone. Words have meaning.

As to being unimportant, that’s closer to the truth. I don’t have the same high opinion of myself that Halpern does and consider myself to be just another truth seeker on the road of life.

The balance of the post is just more of the same…wait for it…in your own words, NONSENSE!

[jay14]

What a bunch of nonsense from Harvey Vechery's minion....


Truth is
No one has contacted
Greg Halpern,
who owns the technology....

MAXD, the company has licensing rights to the technology
but
it's owned by Greg Halpern....
Read the filings!!!!

Harvey Vechery has done NOTHING with the accountant!!!!

NOTHING!!!!

And

Harvey Vechery has done NOTHING with the registration in Delaware!!!!

NOTHING!!!!

Where's the statement from new leadership
and direction of the company,
which should of been released May 1!!!!

[uber darthium]

I hear the little runt man Greg Jessie is being fitted for a Mini Cooper so she can see over the dashboard with her booster chair and little footie extensions.

I bet being a little runt and former CEO that got kicked out and exposed as a liar by the judge has got to suck

I guess we won’t be getting royalties from the In Ground Assets scam

MAXD

[J Galt]

Halpern also stated Vechery was; “ENGINEERING A MASSIVE ON-LINE DEFAMATION CAMPAIGN ON YAHOO FINANCE, YOUTUBE AND INVESTORHUB.” As I’ve stated many times before, Vechery neither designed nor engineered any campaign. No marching orders were ever sent. There was no coordination between Vechery and anyone posting on the boards that I’m aware of. I certainly was never contacted, nor have I ever talked with Vechery, Kapp, or anyone else in his organization. I’ve never posted anything on YOUTUBE either.

I was originally posting in favor of the MAXD technology and the general term “management.” Individual research led to understanding, awareness, and eventually, enlightenment as to what was really going on, with both the technology and the pumping schemes. Was my personal evolution coordinated? Was it engineered or designed by someone? No. My thought process and opinion about Greg Halpern and his technology changed as new information became available. Harvey Vechery didn’t engineer me to find the Z-Trim fraud case information, online Yahoo board posters Janoy, Louie, and Grant did. Are they part of Vechery’s online hit squad? Seems to me they’ve been banging the drums long before Vechery joined the band.

What is the “defamation” campaign Halpern mentions in his headline. Defamation is generally defined as “any false information that harms the reputation of a person, business, or organization. Defamation includes both libel and slander.” The key word is “false.” The statement must be false for there to be defamation. As I’ve stated many times in the past, show me any false information, or lies I’ve posted. You won’t find any. There can’t be defamation if there aren’t provable lies.

Furthermore, it would be hard for Halpern to claim defamation of character because he already destroyed his personal image all by himself. Did Harvey Vechery post last night Videos while in an obviously altered state? No. Videos recorded live and posted without editing. Videos where Halpern fell asleep on camera for almost ten minutes. Videos with Halpern calling out Google executives and federal judges by name, defaming and slandering them with unsubstantiated accusations of illegal and illicit behavior. Videos making fun of “uneducated southern rednecks” in some weird self-promotion gimmick. Videos inserting his image on stage during campaign rallies in a fake Q&A with Donald Trump. Each one of those “I’m For The Dream” videos were a form of “self-defamation” and would play heavily in any legal case. Defamation is difficult to prove in a court of law to begin with, but in Halpern’s case, it would be close to impossible as what he refers to as “100% known lies” are hard truths that can easily be proven.

[J Galt]

Former MAXD CEO Greg Halpern stated on his new website; “THEY INTENTIONALLY DESIGNED THEIR CAMPAIGN WITH 100% KNOWN LIES THAT THEY LEAKED DAILY ON STOCK CHAT BOARDS BY ENGAGING COMMON CRIMINALS WITH THE ONLY PURPOSE BEING TO HIDE THEIR OWN NUMEROUS CRIMES AND ENDLESS BUSINESS FAILURES.”

This is exactly what Halpern has been doing. “Leaking known lies daily” on various social media sites to hide his own “numerous crimes, endless business failures,” and overall villainy. Halpern has been engaging in other forms of social media messaging for many years where he “leaked daily on stock chat boards” information designed to influence the MAXD stock in a positive way, not to mention what he did at Z-Trim and Circle Group. Now he is leaking negative information to defame others and to deflect from his own misdeeds.

The “narrative assassination” is a phrase being bandied about in the news these days and has become a popular tool in the age of social media. This form of assassination is when someone creates a false narrative, designed to destroy the reputation of an individual, or business, without having to resort to old school elimination tactics. Part of the tactic is to begin posting false information online, as many times as possible, and on as many websites as they can find, with the hope that it goes viral.

What Halpern has done with his Hoodwinkers website, along with his latest version of online defamatory rhetoric found on his new website, is exactly that. An attempted character assassination of Harvey Vechery and his Key Brands company. Halpern is bragging about the news being “all over the boards.” The reason it’s all over the boards is because he intentionally placed it there.

[MD1941]

Facts:
Not one solid deal in fourteen years.
Less than $400k in total revenue over fourteen years.
Pushed a fake short squeeze.
Guaranteed a sizable settlement with Google.
Misrepresented his mining deal.
Misrepresented Formula Four Protocol.
Didn't disclose his Z-Trim problems.
Chapter 7 Bankruptcy.
Cheated the biggest MAXD investor.
Abused corporate funding for a lavish lifestyle.
Didn't pay key developers.
Didn't file key filings with the SEC.
Put the stock on the Expert Market.
Embarrassed the company with crazy websites.
Questionable pumping activity.
Blew a deal with Pitbull.
Toxic behavior that chases away business.

[J Galt]

“Post, and Harvey Vechery's minions reply, with distortion....” Point out the exact distortion. Where is the spin? Where are the falsehoods and misrepresentations? When I dissect posts, I always point out my points of contention in a professional way and there is a reason and purpose to each one of my responses. Feel free to reciprocate.

Halpern always talks about reading comprehension issues. Well, I never said it was “in the court’s hands.” Show me where that statement was made. What I have said, repeatedly, is that the legal team is going through a step-by-step meticulous process to ensure there are no mistakes. Part of that involves the court, the other part involves moves behind the scenes to ensure they don’t have any “339” issues. I think most people can read between the lines and understand that Greg Halpern was not much for the details. Most people understand that taxes are meant to be paid, not ignored. They understand that monthly, quarterly, and annual fees and filings must be made to maintain standing and control of company rights. The "post-Halpern “cleanup on aisle five” is apparently more complicated than expected.


“There is NOTHING, legally stopping new leadership to put out a statement, which imo should of been released six weeks ago, May 1....” By the way, adding “imo” in a sentence does not mean you can ignore facts, no matter how convenient it may be to do so.

I never said they couldn’t legally put out a statement. Those are Halpern’s words, not mine. The agenda here seems to be to make shareholders think the Vechery team is incompetent and incapable of assembling words on paper. That’s an easy thing to do, as any professional can put out a PR. Halpern has repeatedly shown over the years that he can upload words to EIN PRESWIRE and make people believe they add up to something. Talk is cheap.

The new team is attempting to do the right thing and not repeat the numerous mistakes Halpern made. I’m sure the Vechery team will assemble the appropriate words and make them public when they are ready. However, freedom of speech allows anyone to scream, capitalize words, or promote the excessive use of exclamation marks.

Finally, I will repeat the fact that May 18th was the day of the Final Order, and nothing could be done legally prior to that date. It may have been backdated to April 28, but the first day inquires could legally be made was on the following day. But who’s counting?

[jay14]

Post, and Harvey Vechery's minions reply,
with distortion....

Facts,
even dissecting doesn't change that


No one has contacted
Greg Halpern....

Harvey Vechery has done NOTHING with the accountant!!!!

NOTHING!!!!

And

Harvey Vechery has done NOTHING with the registration in Delaware!!!!

NOTHING!!!!

Minions want everyone to believe or
think that it's in the courts hands....
Half truth!!!!
There is
NOTHING,
legally stopping new leadership to put out
a statement,
which imo should of been released
six weeks ago,
May 1....

[MD1941]

I'm sure Halpern's expenditures will be far more than what Blaisure spent. The forensic accounting audit should sort out all of his nonsense. I think that it will be proven that Halpern's expenditures will fall into criminal territory.

I posted two SEC cases on prior posts that are nothing compared to what Halpern did. I'm guessing there must be a dart board methodology for picking cases. Halpern definitely deserves special handling for his nineteen years of games.

It's only a matter of time!

[J Galt]

The honesty test was failed with the inclusion of this statement; “Btw John Blaisure, from filings did have a company CC.” Stating that Blaisure had a company credit or debit card is not only revisionist history, but also a bald face lie, and Halpern knows it.

One can’t add the phrase “from filings” in an attempt to make it sound legit when it is untrue. I’ve seen ‘the filings,” and Blaisure never had a company card of any type. From the time he started as the MAXD CEO, right up until the end, he charged all his expenses on his personal cards and then turned them into the company monthly on a spread sheet. For that matter, he was not reimbursed for his expenses and still has an outstanding balance which Halpern has chosen to ignore. The only company card he ever had in his possession was the one Lloyd Trammell turned in when he left the company, and Blaisure never used it. Once again, the statement that John Blaisure had a MAXD credit card, at any point in time, is a fabrication designed to deflect from Halpern’s numerous financial missteps. In other words, it’s not just a prevarication, or even a common Halpern distortion of the facts, It is a complete falsehood. A lie.

The Google judgment is due to Halpern misusing the company card and had nothing to do with John Blaisure having a company card. Feel free to challenge me on this as I have all the receipts in this area.

Blaisure was also not paid for the last 15 months he worked at MAXD. That’s on the books as accrued salary as well. Making the statement that he, “was receiving monies(monthly paycheck) throughout his employment as CEO....” is another fictitious statement which can easily be proven to be false. Halpern is right, it is part of the filings. Just not in the way he thinks. It is part of the record. This is nothing more than an attempt to discredit Blaisure and bring him down to Halpern’s level. No one will believe these dishonest statements from the master of deception.

[J Galt]

This erroneous statement has been repeated once again on the boards, “John Blaisure was in charge until 2019....Get over it!!!!” You’ve made this comment in the past and I’ve countered it. John Blaisure was the CEO, but Halpern knows he was never “in charge.” Everyone else knew that as well. Blaisure had to get everything approved by Halpern.

Blaisure was not in favor of funneling all the time, energy, and company money into the Google lawsuit. He wanted the money invested in R&D but Halpern constantly diverted funds to the Google case. Halpern made all the financial decisions and kept Blaisure behind the “Chinese Wall” when it came to the bank accounts. That was his phrase by the way, in a written email. That’s why Blaisure was blindsided before the Google deposition when Halpern presented all the financial information to him at the 11th hour.

Blaisure has no prior knowledge of Halpern’s use of the company credit card for personal expenses. Google used that information to pierce the corporate veil and the result was judgements were issued against MAXD as a business, and both Halpern and Blaisure individually. The judgment was a disastrous result for the company and tarnished the MAXD reputation in the industry. That’s all on Halpern so any attempts to deflect blame to others will be countered with facts and the truth.

[J Galt]

This statement posted yesterday made me smile, “Magically there's movement today....lol” Most people understand the magic is an illusion created by a magician to fool both the human eye and the connected senses. There was no magic in any movements that may have been made behind the scenes “today” by the Vechery legal team. It is all part of the methodical process going on behind the scenes that I’ve been posting about. Of course, it would appear to be “magic” to someone like Greg Halpern, who has been living in a fantasy world for so long he can’t tell the difference between fact and fiction. The steps being taken by the new legal team on behalf of Harvey Vechery and MAXD are not "magic," they are legally influenced and designed to get the company going in the right direction for the first time in many years.

[J Galt]

This comment from yesterday, “Another “Harvey Vechery or someone associated with him needs to get ahold of Greg Halpern because he is holding all the technology!!!!” As per the court, Halpern no longer owns the technology or any other MAXD property. I’m sure he will be contacted to turn everything over when the Vechery legal team is ready to do so. Not sure what the issue is in this regard as Halpern wasn’t doing anything with the technology anyway. Furthermore, the technology will need to go back into Dexter’s Laboratory before it can be exposed to the public again. In the meantime, Having one of the Halpernettes put together a “to-do,” or “need” list for the Vechery legal team, and then post it online, is an interesting way to send a message. Especially since Halpern is no longer in a legal position to direct anything for MAXD.

[J Galt]

These comments were made in several posts yesterday, “In fact Harvey Vechery hasn't done a single thing with the company since April 28!!!! No one has contacted Greg Halpern.... Harvey Vechery has done NOTHING with the accountant!!!! NOTHING!!!! Harvey Vechery has done NOTHING with the registration in Delaware!!!! NOTHING!!!! Where's the statement!!!!”

Halpern is sending emails to the Halpernettes saying nothing is being done, but how does he know what is happening behind the scenes? He is no longer the CEO, so he doesn’t have a clue what is transpiring. No amount of word capitalization and excessive exclamation points will make up for that hidden point. I would say the Vechery team is in the process of handling all the legal and administrative items on the list that Halpern never thought important enough to take care of.

Imagine there are three ways of doing business. The right way, the wrong way, and the Pleiadean Halpern way. Halpern’s way of doing business is to live in the gray areas, legally, ethically , and morally, as a way of breaking the rules and skirting the law. He believes rules were not invented for Pleiadean Halpern. His way has caused irreparable damage to the company brand and set the development of the technology back so far in the rearview that it’s just a spec in the digital world.

So, Halpern is emailing his minions to push his “Zen NOTHINGness” talking points in order to rile up the shareholder base against Vechery, because “not a single thing” has been done with the company. He also wants everyone to think he’s the competent one and the Vechery team is comprised of Larry, Moe, and Curly.

Two points, Halpern doesn’t know what’s going on because I would suspect they don’t want him to know what is going on. He’s no longer part of the company. But there is another point to consider here after reading the posts. Is Halpern contacting the accountant? Is he in contact with the offices in Delaware? It is important to remember the words of the judge, “defendant Halpern, and anyone acting in concert with him, are permanently enjoined and restrained from, directly or indirectly, by use of any means or instrumentalities…,” representing MAXD in any way.

By the way, this was also stated in one of the posts, “This was also mentioned in that email....” Nice to see the email conduit is still available for agenda driven messaging. Maybe Greg Halpern should be emailing Harvey Vechery’s legal team directly instead of sending messages through his minions on a chat board.

[J Galt]

It was stated on this board yesterday, “Harvey Vechery is having trouble with the beauty line side of the business with getting customer's, because of the hoodwinkers website and now he's seems upset....” This is a perfect example of what I said on the Yahoo site. Greg Halpern only cares about himself and the MAXD shareholders don’t even matter. From what I have heard, former CEO Halpern has always been a ”revenge” based individual from his early days in Chicago and has often bragged about his abilities as a street fighter and counterpuncher.

What matters most to Halpern now? Not the fate of the shareholders. Impacting Harvey Vechery personally. That's what matters. Tarnishing his reputation. Destroying his business relationships. Getting even for imagined slights. All done by posting lies on his Hoodwinkers website and topped off by the same offenses on his new website. What’s best for the shareholders? Halpern has never cared about that part of the business. That’s because Halpern is all about Halpern. What he wants now is revenge and everything he says and does needs to be seen through that prism.

Why would he verbally castigate his angel investor? The man who bailed him out on a business and personal basis. Halpern feels he was unjustly removed from MAXD by Vechery. That’s called cause and effect. For example, Halpern didn’t pay his mortgage payment, taxes, or HOA fees on the house, so was foreclosed upon. Simple cause and effect. He filed for personal bankruptcy protection. Vechery bailed him out and paid all his bills. Then Halpern posted his Hoodwinkers site, for that reason, and general villainy, he was evicted from the house he never paid for. Cause and effect. He didn’t pay any of the personal loans or business notes from Vechery so he was foreclosed out of the company for gross mismanagement. Cause and effect. Didn’t provide an attorney or show up in court so the judge threw the book at him and granted Vecherys’ request for relief. Cause and effect times two. In the words of the judge, : “Halpern Does Not Adhere to Corporate Formalities and Operates Max Sound in Order to Loot Max Sound and its Shareholders.” Those words were carved in marble and cannot be erased by fabricated excuses on an uncontrolled website. Cause and effect.

[MD1941]

Please feel free to list what Halpern did in his fourteen years at MAXD. Nobody was ever going to do a real deal with Halpern. His fourteen years of nothing proves it.

[jay14]

New leadership, if we can call it that

Or
it's a charade....
Magically there's movement today....lol

No contact with
Greg Halpern,

the accountant

or
(which is the most important imo),
Delaware registration....

Any transfer agent should be thinking about new leadership,
unless ethics
is now being thrown out the window....

Btw
John Blaisure,
from filings did have a company CC
and
was receiving monies(monthly paycheck) throughout his employment as CEO....


Forensic accounting was already done through the Google cases....
Also in the filing....lol
Seriously....

[MD1941]

Halpern controlled the money. Why didn't Blaisure control the money? I'm sure forensic accounting will sort things out.

[jay14]

John Blaisure was in charge until 2019....Get over it!!!!

I've moved on, but here we go again 14 years of bad transfer agent excuses....

I'd think a good transfer agent would be asking the same question about
Harvey Vechery!!!!

Where's the statement!!!!

Why no contact with
Greg Halpern,
accountant
or Delaware
for registering the company with the
transfer of leadership????

Instead 14 years; lol....

And
Truth be told of ex transfer agent,
and
Glendale Holdings too....

[MD1941]

What are the excuses for fourteen years of failures? Why didn't he have one solid deal in fourteen years? The deflection game doesn't get Halpern off the hook!

[jay14]

Excuses....

Harvey Vechery has done NOTHING with the accountant!!!!
NOTHING!!!!

Harvey Vechery has done NOTHING with the registration in Delaware!!!!
NOTHING!!!!

[MD1941]

Why didn't the ex-CEO get the same treatment? Halpern did nothing for fourteen years!

$340k in revenue is an absolute joke for fourteen years of magic. The only magic was making $8 million disappear.

[jay14]

Great question for Harvey Vechery....

Harvey Vechery is having trouble with the beauty line side of the business with getting customer's, because of the hoodwinkers website
and
now
he's seems upset....


In fact Harvey Vechery hasn't done a single thing with the company since
April 28!!!!

This was also mentioned in that email....

No one has contacted
Greg Halpern....

Harvey Vechery has done NOTHING with the accountant!!!!
NOTHING!!!!

Harvey Vechery has done NOTHING with the registration in Delaware!!!!
NOTHING!!!!


Harvey Vechery or someone associated with him needs to get ahold of Greg Halpern because he is holding all the technology!!!!

Btw
that 8 million dollar number is heavily inflated....
Filings will show that,

And
current filings
have shown that throughout the years....
Just Harvey Vechery making a call
and
complaining to a few non legitimate shareholders,
so we can get verbiage posted against a former CEO....

I guess we'll know in a few months,
if this was just a charade
from Harvey Vechery....

[MD1941]

What did our ex-CEO do with the $8 million dollars of funding? All of his deflections won't get him off the hook.

Most of my quarters would beat his fourteen year totals!

[uber darthium]

I think he spent the money on platform shoes. The little fella is so short.

How did he fail to leverage that funding into real revenue? Most of us believed that he diverted it to his lavish lifestyle.

[MD1941]

Halpern was lucky enough to be funded millions of dollars for MAXD. How did he fail to leverage that funding into real revenue? Most of us believed that he diverted it to his lavish lifestyle. I can't compete with him in that category. He can claim victory in that category!

[J Galt]

Another comment made by Halpern on his linked website is as follows: “HOST OF THEIR ASSOCIATE CRIMINALS, WHO COLLECTIVELY HAVE NEVER HAD EVEN ONE NOTABLE POSITIVE ACCOMPLISHMENT AMONG THE ENTIRE LOT OF THEIR SORRY (expletive) ”

Who makes statements such as this one? What kind of person accuses others of being criminals without evidence? How about degrading their lifetime accomplishments when he is in no position to judge them? Does he even understand that success is a matter of perspective?

Some people consider raising a family to a positive accomplishment. Being a stay-at-home parent or homeschooling. Building a small business. Working for one company for an entire career and retiring. Retiring after a career in the military. Etc. Why does Halpern consider himself to be the judge of what one man’s positive accomplishments might be? Specifically, to Vechery, I doubt Halpern knows how many lives Vechery might have impacted in a positive way. “Sorry (expletive)?” Time to look in that mirror again Greg.

[uber darthium]

Does anyone have his current address ? I would like to send him some high platform shoes so the little fella can see over a counter

Little runt

[J Galt]

Greg Halpern, on his new website, refers to J. Galt as a “WORTHLESS MEANINGLESS NOBODY WHO SPENDS ALL DAY POSTING HIS MISERY AND ABSOLUTE LIES FOR NO REASON AT ALL AND PRAYS THAT SOMEONE WILL CARE. THEY DON'T.”

How does one define worth? Compared to what? Compared to whom? The wonderful life of Greg Halpern? How does one give meaning to life? Who is the judge of worth and meaning? Greg Halpern? How can you call someone a nobody? Everybody is somebody. That’s just reality.

Why does Halpern care about what I do with my time each day? He doesn’t. He cares about the truth I am posting because it counters his lies. It's an old trick, attack the messenger so readers will ignore the message. Whether or not readers of the boards care about my message is up to interpretation. I have an entire list of shareholders who contact me on a regular basis and let me know their thoughts. In other words, there are some who care out there. Halpern would like that not to be the case, but such is life.

Once again, point out the specific lies. I challenge Halpern to point out the lies he keeps talking about. Go back to my 8-K analysis and find one lie. As a matter of fact, why aren’t Greg & The Halpernettes talking about the specific comments I made in that 13-part series? It’s easier to just cast aspersions on a website than to back up comments with facts. Character assassination is one of the tenets of the Halpern Doctrine and I didn’t expect him to change his ways this late in the game. As always, I will carry on.