Is that volume accurate?
My understanding is the public doesn’t have access to volume/quotes while trading in the expert market…
1 year anniversary of MAXD's last filing.
If Greg Halpern was working so hard, he'd work on informing shareholders via filings how much more money he's stolen from them over the past year.
Looks like Halpern is still evading service, but eventually they will nab him.
Must suck Greg to have to spend your life hiding
MAXIMUM HALPERN SCAM
Does that mean we are back in step 26 out of 45?
As I predicted: Attia lost his appeal. The Attia lawsuit against google is fully dead. It's time for desperate suckers to give up on their dream that MAXD is somehow going to blackmail google for billions.
From the appeal court opinion:
Because Attia has not identified a viable non-duplicative theory of breach of the implied covenant, we affirm the judgment.
do you still find this lawsuit "interesting," Mr. Loophole Lawyer?
Greg is over in the TMMI board pumping his alleged crypto gains.
One crypto coinage up 13 points and
day old, stinky shrimp chasing Yesteryears stories....lol
A non investor of shares,
just a story chaser from Yesteryear....lol
has done nothing since May 1st....
R.I.P. Harvey Vechery!!!!
105K coinage long-term looking good,
gaining losses from the two useless,
that I currently hold....
How are those Taco Nacho fajita mines doing in Mexico ? Did the mineral database locate those mines ?
A MAXIMUM HALPERN SCAM
Ask your friend Halpern if the Mexican mines are a fraud as many here claim
Huh!!!! I've had my accounts long before
I had even heard of
I found MAXD in 2014,
first buy 2015....
All my fines, with research!!!!
monies lost with these escapades over the last nine years
have rapidly taken over
to show increases through cryptocurrency....
Excellent for shorties
as everyone that follows me knows,
I'm looking at the numbers of my coinage at
2025 through 2032....
Keep chasing Yesteryears stories and trying to place Greg Halpern and myself as a team....
House lunch special
yesterday's, day old shrimp,
I’d call it “crowdscamming”
Haha....The poster stated....
that's me!!!! Yes; I did, am The poster!!!!
Bad researcher, assuming, again....
Anyone, such as myself,
a top notch researcher found that
"biz whacker" article
about Harvey Vechery
on the Internet....Haha
It seems not so squeaky clean
Harvey Vechery is all over the Internet,
any real researcher
as already found the truth!!!!
And prior to that
a letter from another MAXD investor
that sent it to me
and I in turn posted it here.....
Not Greg Halpern sending secret messages!!!!
places research with assumptions....
Meanwhile followers, crypto is on fire,
up 9 points,
enjoy the profits.....
And those chasing MAXD
good luck with that,
filling those captive readers
with assumptions of
bla bla bla bla bla....
In the meantime
Harvey Vechery new management with
8 months and counting
and still no signature in Delaware
or any reporting with Sec....
R.I.P. Harvey Vechery!!!!
It never mattered what language Greg Halpern inserted into the SEC filings as his understanding of the truth is truly “alien” compared to the standards applied to the rest of the business world. Greg “alluded” to a great number of things that never panned out. And then when his filings were questioned he took the company to “non-reporting” status and stopped filing.
The Mexican mines existed long before Halpern started marketing the relationship with MAXD. However, the contract between MAXD and Nacho Natera was never completed because the money promised by Halpern was never raised and the stock promised by Halpern never changed hands as it was already pledged to Harvey Vechery on notes. The stock was locked down by the transfer agent. Greg did not convince anyone to invest in the mining operation, so the deal was dead. The mines needed that money to operate. You can’t have a deal when something of value doesn’t change hands. Therefore, there was never any deal with Nacho Natera. In other words. It wouldn’t matter if the mines were profitable right now as MAXD has nothing to do with them because they didn’t fulfill the contract.
The board poster stated, “Just heard from Greg in a email, it's been months thought he disappeared....” Nice try. You posted a link from Greg on this site on 10/7, which was 12 days prior to this post, as well as other links prior to that. These links could only have come from Greg. Once again, telling simple falsehoods such as this one, places everything else you post in question. Halpern’s attempt to begin this post with a disclaimer designed to protect the board poster didn’t work. Even then, if Halpern is sending emails to this individual, which are then being posted online, the board poster is acting in concert with Halpern, which is a breach of the court order.
“He's been working for legitimate MAXD shareholders....” How do you know this? Because Halpern told you he was? With his track record for ignoring the truth, you still expect anyone to believe you? Greg Halpern has been working for himself, which is what he has always done, not the “legitimate” shareholders, whatever that means. Anyone who bought MAXD stock, or traded stock for services, is a legitimate shareholder. Halpern has been working to attempt to build a lawsuit against the man who stopped giving him money. Why? Because he has none and he wants Harvey’s money. He will use the shareholders in an attempt to get money for himself because he has no way to get it from Vechery on his own. Halpern has already defaulted on too many notes for Vechery to willingly give him any more.
The board poster screams out “TAX EVASION!!!!,” with four exclamation marks. That “will be considered” in the lawsuit. Tax evasion is a claim which can only be determined by the IRS, not Greg Halpern. For that matter, I suspect Halpern is an expert in tax evasion. I doubt Harvey Vechery, or anyone on his legal team, has opened his books to Greg Halpern. As to the reason for tax losses or tax evasion, who was responsible for the shambles that is MAXD? Why wouldn’t there be a tax loss associated with MAXD? For anyone who bought stock for that matter. All the company did was lose money. There were no earnings! EVER!!!! And that statement deserves four exclamation marks. Greg Halpern was the man in charge, Vechery only supplied the money that Halpern burned. For all that went wrong with MAXD, the finger always points to the man in charge. The decisions maker. Not the banker. That would be Greg Halpern.
“According to GH, it takes 45 steps to bury someone like Harvey Vechery.... Greg is on step 38....” 45 steps? What are you talking about? Instead of posting cryptic remarks about 45 Pleiadean steps needed to bury his former angel investor, Greg Halpern needs to focus on those 12 known steps to recovery that are posted everywhere for all in need to study and practice.
“MAXD shareholders will be able to join this lawsuit... A lawsuit estimated as a loss to MAXD shareholders, or what Harvey Vechery has cost MAXD shareholders, since this charade begun!!!! $30million!!!!” Thirty million dollars? That’s about $7-1/2 million per exclamation mark! Tell me Greg, what forensic genius came up with that number? The same one who placed a dollar value on your short squeeze scam? The same one who assembled the astronomically impossible mining numbers? The same one who came up with a $57m valuation of the Mexican Land Deal? The Beluga Whale car numbers? The “quadrillion dollar” MAXD Proprietary Mineral Mapping Technology, gold mines, and gold back currency deals? Need I go on? The point is Halpern just pulled some number out of his hat and said Harvey cost the shareholders these losses. Poppycock. MAXD was not profitable. MAXD had zero earnings. Harvey Vechery provided money for many years and never took anything out. Vechery was not involved in the decision-making process. $30 million dollars? Give your head a shake. Greg Halpern willfully took money from Harvey Vechery and provided no revenue or profit in return. And Halpern thinks Vechery owes him?
As I’ve been saying for the last two years, Greg Halpern needs money. He can’t make it the old-fashioned way, by earning it, so he will attempt to sue Harvey Vechery for his money. Sue for a fat number and attempt to settle for less. It’s an old story, one I assume the Vechery legal team will be more than happy to fight.
“A couple months Greg will forward the info and I'll post it so any legitimate shareholder will be able to join the suit!!!!.” Once again, this was the plan all along. Sue the man with the money. The problem is you have to provide “legitimate” reasons for a court of law to decide in your favor and “he’s got money, and I don’t” is not on the list.
“I posted the beginning of Harvey Vechery's woes yesterday.... Nonsuit!!!!” An intentional non-suit is not a “woe,” it is a change in legal strategy. A woe would be a large note in default and no way to pay it.
“This was Harvey Vechery's plan all along, use MAXD as a tax loss write-off!!!!” Rubbish. Harvey Vechery did not invest to lose money. Nor did any other shareholder. Halpern convinced him he would make “quadrillions” of dollars investing with him. His last proposal was entitled “Making Harvey Richer” and was based on Vechery giving Halpern more money so Harvey could make more money. Otherwise, Halpern would have named his promotion “Making Harvey Vechery Another Tax Write-Off.” With four exclamation marks. As I’ve stated before. If Harvey Vechery wanted a tax write off, there are much cleaner, easier, less stressful, and less embarrassing ways to make tax decisions than dumping the money down a MAXD rabbit hole. I’m sure there are many charities waiting for Harvey Vechery’s money. Harvey has a write-off only because Greg Halpern siphoned off his money while failing to have any earnings at MAXD so there was no return on Vechery’s investment.
“Everyone been booing Greg Halpern whereas he's been fighting for this company and his invested $95Million....Say what you want, but the real villain in this case is and has always been Harvey Vechery!!!!” Greg Halpern has been fighting for himself his entire life. Even though the $95m figure was corrected to $5m, that number is also questionable. Taking loans from Vechery to pay MAXD bills, then issuing loans to the company at high interest rates and claiming that as Halpern’s investment back into the company, is a bit unethical. Especially since it was Harvey’s money in the first place.
MAXD never had any revenue deals. It never completed developing a product. Halpern burned every contact the company had due to his arrogant attitude. Halpern’s intentional move to the Expert Market killed MAXD for all shareholders, legitimate and illegitimate, and that includes Harvey Vechery. The long finger of blame is aimed at Greg Halpern and any court of law will eventually make that determination.
Your friend GH stated in maxd SEC filing, November 13 2022, I believe, money received from one of the Mexican mines, So how are the mines going today , or are they a fraud as some here claim ?
Hey Jay, ask Greg if he needs a lawyer referral in New York I have somebody for him. I think he once invested in MAXD. I think he will gladly represent Greg and return the favor
Nah.... I'm into crypto coins, while Court, once again settles this mess....
Numbers are up,
penny stocks, why bother
with coins(pennies) turning in greenbacks!!!!
Whenever GH sends that info on the lawsuit
I'll post it!!!!
someone keeps buying maxd shares, any idea whom it could be ?
Being the stock is dead, who would buy a stock that is completely dead
It’s ok, state of New York is about to change Halpern’s life. Justice will be served finally, in my opinion
Halpern can't even afford any more "MAFIP" press releases. He's been reduced to getting anonymous internet posters to spam links to google docs in lieu of paid promotions.
How's he going to afford the court filing fees for a lawsuit??
He's bankrupt and homeless!
Greg Halpern almost surely won't file any lawsuit.
And if he does, he will lose in court... as usual.
Focusing on the wrong person, again....
Bogus???? I wouldn't call it bogus,
It's for MAXD shareholders....
lol Yeah, you can say that,
for Harvey Vechery,
I can't wait either!!!!
Meanwhile crypto is the current future
and much much more....
Speed lightning coinage moving and grooving upwards with payments....
Faster than PayPal....
I'll post the document whenever I see it
do what you want....
keep us updated on precedings....
already showed his hand,
with nonsuit 10/10/23....
That was one hell of a step master climb to the 38th floor....
Next stop floor 45....
tldr; Greg Halpern plans another bogus doomed lawsuit.
hahah i cannot wait.
Based on the oral arguments, I believe both Attia's appeal & Google's appeals will be rejected.
Attia got himself yet another lawyer, Myron Moskovitz. Moskovitz was underwhelming. He claims the signed Attia / Google document "is not a contract". Judge Bromberg very quickly asked him WTF he talking about, and Moskovitz backed down.
Moskovitz then tried the argument that Google had breached a good faith clause of the contract. Judge Lie asked him to explain how this was distinct from the trade secrets claim that Attia had already lost at trial. Moskovitz apparently failed to deliver a decent explanation because several minutes later she repeated that she needed him to explain how this was not settled fact by the trial decision.
During all this time, Judge Bromberg was actively challenging Moskovitz. Judge Wilson was silent. Moskovitz went over-time.
IMO Moskovitz was simply not capable of making this appeal work. He's either a bad trial lawyer, or a decent trial lawyer who knows he's got a losing case but will put in decent effort to justify his paycheck. IMO he wasted a lot of time spouting irrelevant claims & trying to build an appeal-to-emotion.
Fred Rowley argued for Google. He was brisk and kept his feet out of his mouth. Rowley made a half-hearted effort to argue that Google deserved costs because Attia's lawsuit was so frivolous. Judge Lie told him it was "high hill to climb" for the appeals court to overrule the trial court's discretion, and Rowley capitulated. Seems like Rowley was barely going through the motions on Google's appeal, and that Google doesn't really care much about trying to get money from broke Attia.
Some quotes i found funny:
Moskovitz: "google estimated they would make over $200 billion / year on this" (google's 2022 revenue was $280b)
Moskovitz : "this is not a contract"
Bromberg: "So this is a 6 month long contract."
Moskovitz: "Yes. So? I mean-"
Bromberg: "I am trying to understand why forming another company after that time period breaches the covenant of good faith and fair dealing"
Moskovitz : "Well. This is- This whole thing was written by Google. Alright? Attia had no input into it."
Tell Greg to be on the lookout for a love note from New York. I believe it’s on its way or about to be.
Damn it’s a small world.
Tell the little runt to stand up when I talk to him.
Just heard from Greg in a email,
it's been months
thought he disappeared....
He's been working for legitimate MAXD shareholders....
Not a wantabe Florida researcher....
Who is not a legitimate shareholder, just fighting for a friend....
Great, maybe now
that friend will be able to join the right team,
It doesn't even matter anymore....
All one needs to do is,
Harvey Vechery Key Brands
everything comes up and anyone can read the fraudulent claims, over the years
which is and will be considered in this lawsuit as
According to GH,
it takes 45 steps to bury someone
like Harvey Vechery....
Greg is on step 38....
MAXD shareholders will be able to join this lawsuit...
A lawsuit estimated as a loss to MAXD shareholders,
or what Harvey Vechery has cost MAXD shareholders, since this charade begun!!!!
A couple months Greg will forward the info and I'll post it so any legitimate shareholder will be able to join the suit!!!!
I posted the beginning of Harvey Vechery's woes yesterday....
This was Harvey Vechery's plan all along,
use MAXD as a tax loss write-off!!!!
Everyone been booing Greg Halpern
he's been fighting for this company
and his invested $95Million....
Say what you want, but the real villain in this case is and has always been Harvey Vechery!!!!
Where's puppet, bad YouTube video maker???? Lol
it's going to be a wild 2024!!!!
Interesting that a lawyer who's interested in this lawsuit wouldn't have any comment on the recent oral arguments
That’s ok. Did you hear about the lawsuit against Halpern in New York ?
Now THIS is going to be funny
This popped up while I was checking out crypto,
for those chasing that dream,
this happened in Texas!!!!
Harvey Vechery was GRANTED notice of nonsuit!!!! lol
HV is throwing in the towel on
FORMULA 4 from yesteryear.... lol
For those wondering about a nonsuit....
Nonsuit is a judgment given against a plaintiff in which the court dismisses a case because the plaintiff either was unable to make an adequate showing or is unwilling to continue with the case....
Amazing. It's taken years Galt, to open your eyes or mind yet, it's obvious that you've discovered; there is a forest behind the trees and you may not hear it, but when one falls it makes a sound.
Party of four, two thumbs up!!!!lol
Excellent buying opportunity followers,
now through April 2024
as settlement is looking good....
Outdated researcher still keeping on track with yesterday's news....
MAXD is gone, move on!!!!
is not going to do anything,
if he was there would of been a signature in Delaware!!!!
I've moved on, but hey best of luck!!!!
Look, our cryptocurrency down @$0.49 an excellent time to add....
I did, now sitting @85,000 coins,
And I wouldn't be surprised to watch it float downward towards $0.42,
it could bounce to its new high,
still way below those predictions of 2024 and beyond!!!!
Halpern is a little wee wee runt Boi
Thanks for answering my question so I could clear up the confusion on my end. I also thank you for engaging in the debate instead of casting aspersions and avoiding the questions like a certain other board poster.
The only thing I know about the transaction is what Greg Halpern posted on his websites. He claimed to have taken the MAXD Audio Biometric Security in exchange for money he claims is owed to him by MAXD. He then claimed he has taken all the technology in exchange for more of the money supposedly owed by MAXD. I haven’t read anywhere that he had a contract, or document of any type for that matter, as he wasn’t specific. He claimed to have made these “transfers” back in “late December 2022” because that was before the judgment against him on January 11, 2023. Very convenient. As mentioned, he did not file an 8K or any notice that he was taking these MAXD assets. He did not tell Vechery. There is no evidence that he made this transaction other than his words printed on the website. He never mentioned this transfer, at the time, on any of his websites and nothing was mentioned by Jay & the UnAmericans. Therefore, this appears to be nothing more than Halpern attempting to backdate a transfer of assets prior to losing control of the company.
All this is a moot point as Halpern forgot that he pledged all MAXD assets in notes to Harvey Vechery which are now in default. The technology was not Halpern’s, or MAXD’s, to transfer. Not then, and certainly not now.