Max Sound Corporation (MAXD)

[jay14]

Btw this sentence:

The January claim is just the usual misrepresentation from Team Halpern.
That so call,
misrepresentation
was in response to Harvey Vechery's minion....


Everybody hoping
Harvey Vechery
is going to swoop down and
save the company....


It's being reported now that there's
no technology

and
releasing a statement
should of been done
May 1....

Blaming the former CEO only goes so far....


Same ship,
new Captain,

And
same old story....

[MD1941]

We had fourteen years of excuses from Team Halpern. The January claim is just the usual misrepresentation from Team Halpern. The ruling wasn't released until May.

[MD1941]

Someone forgot that Team Halpern didn't file three quarters of filings.Team Halpern was the one holding back important information.

[J Galt]

Unlike Greg Halpern, Harvey Vechery listens to his legal team. For that matter, he has one, Halpern does not. I’m sure announcements will be made when they are ready. The shareholders have waited for 14 years with no revenue deals and nothing but double talk from Halpern. I think everyone has developed enough patience to wait a bit longer.

[jay14]

Harvey Vechery's agenda is to delay
any news important to shareholders....

Statements can be made publicly there’s no law on waiting period from stopping new leadership to make a statement....

Six months and counting....

[J Galt]

The judgment was entered on January 11, 2023. Relief order issued April 28, 2023. Final order posted 5/18, 2023. It is now June 4, 2023. 17 days after the final order was posted online at the end of the business day. No legal move could be made until the Final Order was issued and clarifications from the court were given. This has taken time. Facts are facts. The Order takes the removal date back to April 28th, but the legal team could not start until Final Order was issued.

The filings have been delayed due to the unbelievable mess Halpern left the company in, both legally and administratively. The non-filings with the SEC are just the tip of the iceberg. One can use the same imagination fine-tuned over the last 14 years to figure it out. The filings will come out when the legal team releases Vechery to proceed. In the meantime, readers can tell this is a ploy to transfer the blame for 14 years of failure to someone who had no say in company policy to begin with. The company is on the Expert Market thanks to Greg Halpern. The stocks can only be bought and sold on specific platforms. Therefore, there is no rush to have a filing out because most people can’t trade anyway.

[jay14]

Someone asked a question about the mines....
Here's that response from an email....

Mines, Vechery blocked that deal

Mexico Land Deal and Coin Base belongs to Greg Halpern

Japan Deal Vechery Injunction killed it

Btw
Statements can be made publicly there’s no law on waiting period from stopping new leadership to make a statement....

.

The above are common sense,
Vechery has power to control behind the scenes,
otherwise why stop the mines????

The Mexico Land deal was to counter Vechery blocking the mines,
to get the deal going....

May filing would be good news for the shareholders,
well now,
it’s no longer
Greg Halpern's obligation....


Vechery wants control of the company,
by all means,

control it....

Time is ticking,
it should not take long to make a statement....

[J Galt]

"Interesting, if Greg Halpern has made himself a laughingstock.... What does that say about the orchestrated removal of our former CEO with this statement????”

In general terms, debating anyone who has a different understand of how the rules of engagement are generally understood to work is a difficult task. Facts, figures, and dates have a special symmetry, as is the case with most mathematics. Thinking outside the box is an analytical skill required to succeed in "life. Greg Halpern is ultimately responsible for his own actions. If the result of 14 years of poor decisions has resulted in him “making himself a laughingstock," then he has no one to blame but himself.

As to the “orchestrated removal,” Halpern was removed by the judge for specific reasons, and it had nothing to do with any orchestration. His own words on the Hoodwinkers website, in audio, video, and his writings, were used against him in court. His own words in promotional writings were also presented to the judge who ruled against him. What did the judge rule? Here is his statement direct from the Final Order:

In the words of the Honorable Judge Timothy Taylor, “Halpern’s Misrepresentations Regarding the Business of Max Sound” and “Halpern Does Not Adhere to Corporate Formalities and Operates Max Sound in Order to Loot Max Sound and its Shareholders.” Words have meaning.

[J Galt]

“Same old story with a new captain at the helm....” The way this sentence is framed, it seems an admission of guilt to all past accusations made of Halpern. Although I understand the desire by Halpern to attempt to share blame with Harvey Vechery for all that went wrong with MAXD over the years, it’s not going to work as Vechery was in the background with no input. The “Same old story” tag will only become true if Vechery tracks the same dark trail through the back alleys and carnival sideshows that Greg Halpern followed. Time will tell, as none of us know what the new company will do until they make an official announcement.

[J Galt]

An opinion is not a fact. “Vechery spent years colluding with Greg Halpern” was one man’s opinion. That is all. A quick search of the word colluding defines the word to mean “conspiring, plotting, scheming, planning, and conniving.” It was well known that Harvey Vechery bought out the toxic debt each time he was asked to do so. He loaned the company money, and loaned Halpern money on a personal basis anytime he asked for it. Others questioned why there weren’t strings attached and thought he should be demanding more in return. It was said that Vechery let Halpern do whatever he wanted to do and get away with everything. Vechery had no board position. He was not a director or officer. He was not an advisor or consultant. Greg Halpern did not listen to Harvey Vechery and did whatever he wanted to do in relation to MADX without interference. This was known by all involved. Therefore, none of those synonyms accurately describe the relationship. But that doesn’t mean someone can’t inaccurately describe the situation for their own imagined benefit as that’s what freedom of speech is all about.

[J Galt]

“Harvey Vechery's minions about to unleashed more untruths, with no filing, just more hearsays such as, Vechery has indicated he is prepared to invest the necessary money in ...engineering to get everything up to speed and running.”

What is hidden inside the words of this new mantra? The thought that the shareholders would be unhappy with the idea Vechery is going to spend money improving the technology is a bit strange. That he is going to invest in making the company profitable for the shareholders for the first time in MAXD history should be a happy one. Why would anyone disagree with improving a technology that has been dormant for years?

[J Galt]

“Fascinating, our former CEO has no more obligations, but still seems to be the talk of the town....lol.”

The former CEO has the obligation to turn over all MAXD property to the new owner and cooperate with the transfer. He has that obligation to the shareholders. Halpern will be the talk of the town for a long time due to all his past deeds. It’s called a legacy. It’s also called closing the books. The epilogue. Soon we won’t need to talk about him as he will be gone with the wind. Personally, I look forward to the fresh air.

[jay14]

Exactly

The judgment was on January 11, 2023

Six months later,
more excuses....

[jay14]

Fascinating, our former CEO has no more obligations,
but

still seems to be the talk of the town....lol

Harvey Vechery's minions about to unleashed more untruths,
with no filing,
just more hearsays such as,
Vechery has indicated he is prepared to invest the necessary money in ...engineering to get everything up to speed and running
And

it's being reported that
Vechery spent years colluding with Greg Halpern.

Same old story with a new captain at the helm....

[J Galt]

Another statement from the Honorable Judge Timothy Taylor; “Halpern’s Misrepresentations Regarding the Business of Max Sound,” is worth remembering whenever you read something directly, or indirectly attributed to Greg & the Halpernettes, as well as anything they say about…..anything. “Misrepresentations.”

“More hearsay; where is this in any filing or report???? Vechery has indicated he is prepared to invest the necessary money in ...engineering to get everything up to speed and running. Whom has Harvey Vechery talked to about this plan.” “where's the filing stating that Harvey Vechery plans on investing in the technology, which is now being reported as not being concrete????”

There are no filings or reports yet as there are legal issues being cleaned up behind the scenes. When information is not available, one must use their imagination, as all MAXD shareholders have been doing for years. For instance, imagine an NCIS episode where hotel management enters a room Halpern had previously rented only to find it trashed and in need of repair. As the police believed a crime had been committed, they yellow taped the room and no one could enter until their forensic work was completed. Once that work was completed, no one could put their name on the room until the trash was taken out, the floors and walls were cleaned, the furniture back in place, and the room fumigated due to the odor left behind. Translate that into corporate terms and the board poster will have the answer as to the filing schedule. The board poster will also see the official report and filing the same time I do and everyone else does.

Until the company issues an official statement naming a new CEO, and that CEO states the new game plan, everything mentioned about MAXD will fall under the “hearsay” category. Unless you were on the inside and involved directly with the principles, most of the posts about MAXD over the last few years would qualify as “hearsay.” The comment is right, beach counselor, it is hearsay. I “HEARD” from another person that Harvey Vechery plans to invest money back into the company and get it up and running. In English, that is an “indication” of an action. A sign, a suggestion, a signal, or a hint of actions yet to come. It is not, however, an official proclamation, or even a “concrete” report from anyone within the company. It is also hearsay because, as I have stated all along, I don’t have any contact with Harvey Vechery. The attempt to accuse someone of spreading insider information is transparent. Not to mention, lame. By the way, where did one “hear” that it would cost “$150-$200k” to upgrade the product? Where did the board poster hear about the claims about the house? Hearsay is defined as: “A statement which a witness has heard another person say, or a written statement offered in evidence without producing the author to testify as to the issues stated.” Until an officer of the company is named and he/she makes a statement, it is all hearsay. I guess what’s good for the goose is not always good for the gander.

[J Galt]

“I thought there was a product, but I was following the Google case, which lead to Japan, and that was a two year, down the drain deal in a blink of an eye....”

What convoluted logic is this? The Google case led to Japan? How so? Through Rurouni? Google despised Greg Halpern due to his late night Vimeo comments about Google executives. That's why they went after him personally to get judgments.

If there really was a deal in Japan, Halpern, or for that matter, Rurouni, could have gone to Vechery and attempted to buy extra time for MAXD, or sell the concept of the deal to him. Halpern could have done the same. Outside of the Halpernettes, none of us believe there really was a deal in Japan anyway, for MAXD that is, as there was no LOI, no contract, and no announcement on an official site. The EIN PRESSWIRE press release was obviously a paid for gimmick and written by an amateur.

“Gone in the blink of an eye” is an interesting twist of Einstein’s time theories because the date of the judgment was January 11, and the court relief date was April 28th, and the final order on May 18th. I guess if time is a flat circle, then four plus months could be referred to as a “blink of an eye.”

[J Galt]

“Our former CEO paid $2.9m and from what's being reported Harvey Vechery has made over $4.1m, with that sell....” and “that was the real meat of this meal.”

Words have meaning. Let’s see if I have this train of thought clear in my mind. Halpern was forced to leave his first “mansion” by the couple who owned the house as he was leasing it and they wanted it back. Even though he claimed to be the owner to anyone who would listen. Greg Halpern wanted another mansion, but he had no money. He borrowed the downpayment money from Harvey Vechery and, since he did not have the necessary credit to buy the house, he asked Harvey to line him up with acquaintances who owned a lending company. They arranged the high interest loan for him based, in part, on questionable information provided by Halpern. In the financial docs He stopped making payments, so the lender foreclosed on the note. This is all in the public domain.

One reason Halpern filed for bankruptcy protection so he would not lose the house. Harvey had the second position lien on the house and did not want to lose the money he had already invested in the house. In the bankruptcy, Harvey paid off the house loan to the lender in full. He had to negotiate a six-figure penalty and fee assessment from the lender, and then pay it, along with bailing out Halpern by paying all his personal bills as well. Not to mention settle the Google lien, as they also had a position on the house as well due to the personal lien on Halpern. That’s when Vechery learned the truth about Halpern and how he had been played, lied to, and manipulated. As the true homeowner, Harvey laid claim on the property and had Halpern evicted.

This poster is saying the MAXD takeover was a Machiavellian plot by Vechery so he could get the “real meat of this meal” house back from Halpern? A house that he didn’t want or need? A house that he would have to sell at a personal loss due to the changing market and expenses associated withthe house?. A house that he had $4.6 million dollars in cash invested. “Harvey Vechery has made over $4.1m, with that sell…?” What kind of voodoo economics is that?

The house may have been valued at $2.9 when Halpern was living there, but as the downpayment and all monthly payments made came from direct or indirect loans from Harvey Vechery, claiming “our former CEO PAID $2.9m” is outlandish. He did not own the house outright. He paid a deposit and started making payments. That does not mean he paid cash for the house. The value of the house was on paper only.

Beyond that, Vechery supposedly had $4.6m in cash invested in the house, by the time he paid off the lender and all his additional fees. He also paid the back taxes, HOA fees, repair and maintenance, upkeep and utilities until the house sold. Then there were the 6% realtor fees involved that had to be paid. Therefore, suggesting that Vechery “MADE over $4.1m” is not only inaccurate, but also ludicrous. Simple math would indicate he lost money on those numbers alone. The board poster may want to climb down from this particular hill and rethink the future path he wants to take.

By the way, as I stated in my “8-K ANALYSIS” that I posted on the Yahoo board, any money Halpern claims to have “lost” was Harvey Vechery’s money anyway, as the only money Halpern had was from loans Vechery made to MAXD, which inevitably ended up in Halpern’s pocket, or loans to Halpern personally. MAXD had no revenue deals, unless you count Tip and Form 4, which were both funded with Vechery’s money. In other words, all of Halpern’s “income” that he paid mortgage payments with originated in the form of loans from Harvey Vechery. Therefore, one could say that Halpern had been playing with Vechery’s HOUSE money all along. in more ways than one.

[J Galt]

“Harvey Vechery is already ahead of the game, with the Mansion, and that was the real meat of this meal.... The battle over shares was just their head knocking between the two, which seems to of been going on for years, decades.... Who knew that, not me, but some did.... “ “Harvey and Greg were best buds for years, and they had a falling out....”

Nice spin. I wonder where this latest fantasy is coming from. Who is delivering this message, by email, to be posted, and why? Are these the latest talking points issued from the RV? Will this be the next fabricated hill Halpern wants to battle on? So be it. This is nothing more than revisionist history in a transparent attempt to rebuild a recently destroyed reputation.

“Harvey and Greg were best buds!” That hilarious thought could only have come out of the same delusional mind that believed everyone liked him. The same mind who believed his losses to Google in court were a win. The same mind who thought he had Biometric Audio Security and MAXD proprietary Mineral Mapping Technology. The same mind who started the Hoodwinker website, filled with fantastical statements from Halpern, not to mention lies, distortions, and “secret files.” I doubt Harvey will be forgetting what Halpern said about him on that website. “Until they had a falling out?” Greg Halpern milked Harvey Vechery for every dime he could get with his false promotions. Halpern only lost the self-appointed “best bud” title when Vechery finally said NO for the first time. There was no “battle over shares” for years, on wait…decades! This is laughable on it’s face. Harvey had all the shares he needed, and he hasn’t been involved in MAXD for decades. If the post is referring to the preferred shares, Vechery handed them back to Halpern, at his direction, at the end of Halpern’s personal bankruptcy. This has all been broken down in the 8-K Analysis on the Yahoo site.

[jay14]

Interesting, if Greg Halpern has made himself a laughingstock....

What does that say about the orchestrated removal of our former CEO
with this statement????

Vechery spent years colluding with Greg Halpern.

Or this statement,

Vechery has indicated he is prepared to invest the necessary money in ...engineering to get everything up to speed and running

IS this false information????

[grantastic]

Vechery spent years colluding with Greg Halpern.

I can only guess at Vechery's agenda, but I assume he plans to continue scamming MAXD shareholders on his own now that Halpern's made himself a laughingstock.

Are you saying Harvey Vechery's agenda

will be to just run the price up and then bail out????

[jay14]

Where's that post/ YouTube video
about MAXD having no technology????

[Alfred11]

Check out mt Yahoo post re maxd

[jay14]

More hearsay; where is this in any filing or report????

Vechery has indicated he is prepared to invest the necessary money in ...engineering to get everything up to speed and running

Whom has Harvey Vechery talked to about this plan,

And

where's the filing stating that Harvey Vechery plans on investing in the technology,
which is now being reported as not being concrete????

[J Galt]

“Halpern’s Misrepresentations Regarding the Business of Max Sound,” and “Halpern Does Not Adhere to Corporate Formalities and Operates Max Sound in Order to Loot Max Sound and its Shareholders,” are two definitive statements, made by the Honorable Judge Timothy Taylor in the Final Order removing Greg Halpern from the company. Every comment made on any board should start, and end, with this legal statement in mind. Here is another one from Judge Taylor, and it is the definitive one: “Halpern is hereby ordered removed as a director of Max Sound as of the issuance of this Judgment.”

The filing will be out when it is legally required to be filed. Unlike the 14 years of history with Halpern, I’m sure it will be a filing of substance, as opposed to the last joke of an 8-K that was just dissected on the Yahoo boards. Would anyone care to comment on the content of those posts? Especially since they were used so often on this board to defend Halpern. Halpern thumbed his nose at the legal system his entire career. Maybe even his entire life. And never showed up in court to defend himself. And yet the minions blindly followed him like he was the Pied Piper of the penny stock market.

Harvey Vechery seems to have plenty of options, unlike Greg Halpern who will soon have few, if any. It has been stated repeatedly that the MAXD technology needs upgrading, or it will not be marketable. Nothing has been done to the technology in years and Halpern is not an engineer or code writer. Biometric Audio Security was never completed by Lloyd Trammel. It is just a shell Halpern and his minions used for promotion purposes. MAXD proprietary mineral mapping technology was an invention by Halpern to sell his gold mining operation and does not exist. Filings show MAXD has not spent any money on development in many years as the engineers stopped working as they were not paid.

As I have stated in past posts, Vechery has indicated he is prepared to invest the necessary money in engineering to get everything up to speed and running, which is more than Halpern ever did. All technology upgrades were set aside so Halpern could focus on his litigation strategy, persona product development, such as Formula 4, and his lavish lifestyle. By the way, how did the board poster come up with the “$150-200k” cost figure to upgrade the technology? Stock wizardry and board pontificator are in a different category than technological engineering and budgeting. I guess the email connection is still live.

“Running up the PPS” and then “bailing out” is the specialty of Greg & the Halpernettes and will not be repeated with the new group. Furthermore, why would anyone invest money in this company until they have a real product to market? Especially after all the years of fake deals, false promise, lies, deceptions, Hoodwinkers websites, and personality defects demonstrated during the Halpern regime. MAXD will have to prove itself all over again and no number of fake promotions will overcome the stink of the last 14 years. Those “minions,” by the way, were all extensions of Greg Halpern and his unique way of placing stock market manipulations over product development. If we see more of the same from the new group, I will call it out as well.

A few additional comments before I go about my day, constantly bragging about taking profits at the low levels while everyone else suffered through losses is not a good look. Not mentioning inside connections while claiming to be a financial clairvoyant would add a bit of honesty, which is sadly missing in most posts. My final comment was posted in another response but seems to fit here as well. The ostrich approach of sticking one’s head in the sand and ignoring reality of the situation is a strategy destined for failure.

[jay14]

Harvey Vechery only has two options....

Invest in the company he's already invested in, or cut his loses....

Harvey Vechery is already ahead of the game,
with the Mansion, and that was the real meat of this meal....

The battle over shares was just their head knocking between the two,
which seems to of been going on for years, decades....
Who knew that, not me, but some did....

Our former CEO paid $2.9m and
from what's being reported
Harvey Vechery has made over $4.1m, with that sell....

So, yes,
Harvey Vechery could easily invest
but
is there really a product????

I thought there was a product, but
I was following the Google case,
which lead to Japan, and
that was a two year, down the drain deal in a blink of an eye....

Imo
this was set in motion as soon as
the monetary case (Feb) concluded....

Harvey Vechery's top-notch lawyer's should of had a statement ready to go the following Monday
May 1....
No excuses!!!!


Will Harvey Vechery place $150-$200K into MAXD,
if there's no product????

In my opinion
Harvey and Greg were best buds for years, and they had a falling out....

HV knows,
if there's any technology worth saving!!!!

Where's the filing????

[jay14]

Actually it could be said
with a contraction, article and noun....

"Where's the filing"????

Harvey Vechery only has two options, imo....
1. Invest $150-$200K to upgrade the technology....

2. Have Harvey Vechery's minions run the PPS upwards and then bail out....

Lately,
option 1. was reported as,
there is no product....

Geeze I'm really glad I took profits....
It could be months before anything happens....

Wake me up when September ends....

[J Galt]

I've been posting a review and analysis of the 8-K Greg Halpern submitted to the SEC on behalf of MAXD on November 21, 2022. It is a 12-part breakdown and is available on the Yahoo site, where humor and sarcasm are not frowned upon. It’s almost impossible to respond to Halpern’s absurdity without being absurd in return. A little paraphrased Rush Limbaugh lingo there!

As of this morning, I have posted seven of the twelve sections with two more going up later today and the final three tomorrow. The reason for this process was due to Halpern using the SEC 8-K submittal to justify all his actions, including non-filings, and his intentional move of the company to the Expert Market. Anytime someone brought up a question, on this board as well, we were told “it’s in the 8-K!” It was used as both a mocking tactic and shutdown statement to end the conversation and counter any comments against the narrative. For that reason, I decided to go back and re-read the document with a new set of eyes. What I found is exactly what I recalled reading the first time, a poorly written dime store novel with the full intent to lay blame for “everything, everywhere, all at once.” Not to mention an official SEC submittal that should never have been made.

I’ve highlighted Halpern’s words in bold, and they are his words, not mine. My words are commenting on, criticizing, and, at times, mocking his own words, as Halpern and his minions have been mocking ours on the boards for years. My purpose was to point out Halpern’s world view as a victim of “bad actors,” not to mention his egotistic opinion of himself and his past accomplishments.

I’ve had shareholders ask that I post all 12 segments at one time but that is not possible. There is a word limit to each post and I’m not aware of any way to have a “thread unrolling” as can be done on Twitter. You also are not allowed to include links to other websites for self-promotion. In addition, I’m not sure anyone could stay awake reading all 12 parts in one sitting anyway. Another reason all 12 are not up is that I must edit each one to ensure the accuracy of each statement and to keep from crossing the TOS lines. I’m writing each post as I read through and highlight so it is time consuming. Due to the fact there is so much material to work with. All twelve will be posted as of end of day tomorrow so we can all go back to positivity posting about unicorns and rainbows.

[MD1941]

Who broke MAXD? The ex-CEO ran MAXD as his personal ATM for fourteen years. Millions ran through the hands of the ex-CEO. Where did all the money go?
The ex-CEO isn't off the hook!

[J Galt]

Harvey Vechery owns Max Sound Corporation and all the MAXD assets, including the source code and all related MAXD technology. That is what is commonly referred to as a “stone cold fact!” The judge determined that to be part of the case. Vechery owns all records associated with the company as well. It’s all part of the court order. He also owns whatever MAXD property Halpern has hidden in his personal safe, including the Connie Nash source code which he recently stated was “lost in the move.”

As I have shown in a prior post, Max Sound Corporation bought the source code and technology from Lloyd Trammell in a stock exchange. Greg never owned it, the company did. That’s in black and white. Halpern seems to have forgotten that he pledged all his personal assets, along with all the assets of Max Sound Corp, as collateral for all the millions Vechery loaned to Halpern personally, as well as to the company. The company now belongs to Harvey Vechery. Lock, stock, and barrel. Prove me wrong.

“Harvey Vechery has a legal obligation to fix the company.” Setting aside the admission that the company is “broken,” and thanks for that by the way, Harvey Vechery doesn’t even have a legal obligation to RUN the company. There is no legal obligation to “fix” anything. Find that for me in the law books. How would the government define the word “fix” anyway? Governments and the judiciary do not oversee success or failure in business unless and until the laws are broken. Sometimes not even then. If that were the case Halpern would already be wearing stripes.

As to the “legal obligation” comment, as I see it, Harvey Vechery has several options as the new owner of the company. Most of them are not “legal” obligations as any attorney would state that opinion if asked. He has a legal obligation to follow the rules when taking over any corporation as well as to follow the SEC guidelines. Legalities and rules aside, he could choose to strip the company of all assets and dispense with them as he likes, Gordon Gekko style. He could attempt to sell an outdated technology, close the company, walk away, and then write off his losses. On the other hand, he could choose to invest the necessary money in legal fees to correct all the wrongs perpetrated by Halpern. This includes with the SEC, the OTC, FINRA, Delaware, California, and all taxes due to everyone else on the planet. He could then pay off the auditors, attorneys, and engineers to right the sinking ship and install a new engine to propel it forward. He could also choose to appoint a new leadership team to captain the ship. Those are choices, not obligations. Especially not of the legal variety.

Moral obligation? That’s a different story. Is it a moral obligation to counter immoral activity? Calling all philosophers! But why would Vechery need to “fix” the company anyway? Because it’s been run into the ground by a rogue CEO who had no board of directors to oversee his plundering and pillaging. No adult supervision. His only overseer was the chemically distorted image of the man in the mirror and an imaginary band of “force fed” marionettes on the chat boards. Because he diluted the stock to the point it would take the “gazillions” in revenue Greg Halpern was always promising to shareholders, to be able to achieve a ROI for anyone with stock in MAXD. Because Halpern spent more of his time monitoring and manipulating the chat boards, not to mention authoring fantastical 8ks and making up fake deals to pump the stock, instead of doing his job “fixing” the company. I wonder, for the last 14 years, what was HALPERN'S “legal obligation?” Isn’t he responsible for the status of the company delivered to Vechery by the court ruling? Some might even say Halpern's14-year agenda was to enrich himself and that he's the one who really “screwed the pooch” for the long-term shareholders.

“so HV doesn't get sued by the shareholders....” There it is again. The real agenda for Greg & the Halpernettes. The imaginary class action lawsuit. The only way Halpern thinks he can “win” money for himself is by suing the man who actually has some.

[J Galt]

I have no idea if Harvey Vechery will be doing a reverse split or not but the reason it’s brought up on this site is an obvious one, because it’s a logical option for a publicly traded company to consider.

Most owners of publicly traded companies would be forced to consider this option if they were in MAXD’s position. Why? Because the stock has been diluted beyond belief. Because Greg Halpern is a failed businessman who continued to borrow money instead of earning it the old-fashioned way. Because there were no revenue deals in 14 years of failed attempts. Because toxic note holders would convert their notes into shares and then dump them with machine like precision with no concern for the shareholders.

Harvey Vechery was the opposite of a toxic lender. He bought out all the toxic debt, at the request of MAXD management, to help the company. He then held the shares instead of selling, which was for the benefit of the shareholders. The assumption has been made on the boards that Vechery converted all his notes and then sold but that is not true.

Meanwhile, Halpern kept going back to the well and authorizing more shares. Then he would go back and borrow more money against them and the vicious cycle would continue. On the other hand, Harvey has not sold his shares and has not converted all his notes. He locked down the shares with the transfer agent to prevent Halpern from making any more desperate moves. Vechery was not only thinking of himself, but the shareholders as well when he filed suit against the Halpern and the company. At his own expense I might add.

Doing a reverse split has a purpose if done properly. It is a proportional transaction based on percentages. The result is that you have fewer shares, but their value should be higher if the company does their job properly. Timing is important, yet I don’t see the logic when a stock is on the Expert Market and shows a thousand zeros as the current value. .

There are also issues such as who will invest in a sub-penny stock as many market makers won’t even deal with stocks in that category. My point is there are reasons to consider a reverse split, but the timing of that move would be important. There are also reasons not to split. I have no way of knowing if that’s even being considered. I do know it was considered in the past for MAXD for all the reasons mentioned.

[jay14]

That'll be an interesting thought....

Harvey Vechery has a legal obligation to fix the company,
but what he doesn't know,
is that he doesn't own any of the technology....

Imo, sadly nothing happens,
except going through the motions
so HV doesn't get sued by the shareholders....

Believe it or not;
Harvey Vechery's agenda
"screwed the pooch"
for long-term MAXD shareholders....

[Alfred11]

"the financial wastelands of Zimbabwe" LOL!

[Kracker Jones]

The big question will HV try to help existing shareholders or do a big RS to get rid of them?

[J Galt]

Here are the holiday weekend facts:

The court date for the judgement against Greg Halpern and MAXD was January 11, 2023. The court date for the relief hearing was April 28, 2023. Greg Halpern did not hire an attorney to represent him for either court date. Greg Halpern did not show up personally to represent himself for either court date. Greg Halpern openly made light of the court case on his Hoodwinkers website and in online posts.

The fact that he did not show up on these dates, as was the same with every Halpern court date in the past, speaks volumes to his overall disrespect for the rules of business and the judicial system. It also indicates he knew he did not have the facts on his side to sway the court in his direction. The fact that he did not even hire an attorney, in an attempt to block or delay the verdict, indicates he was unable to afford one. It may also indicate that he had no “Japan Deal” to present to the court as evidence he was capable of remaining in office. The comments being made on the boards seem to indicate he didn’t even inform Team Rurouni of his impending fate. Greg Halpern is to blame for all of this, not Harvey Vechery.

The Minute Order from the court was posted online April 28th. Until the final order was processed and posted by the court, with “minor adjustments,” the Vechery legal team could not move forward in any area. The final order was posted late in the day on May 18th and the court was contacted shortly thereafter for specific guidelines and clarifications not mentioned in the order. For that reason, the “Vechery Team” did not take over in April, as has been mentioned on this site. Even a beach attorney knows that is the case. The new mantra of “it’s been four weeks and no news” is both inaccurate and misleading.

I’m sure the new ownership will officially post news, as required by the SEC, when they are legally able to do so. Pushing for answers before the proper steps are taken smacks of an agenda, which we all know is the case. MAXD is on the Expert Market due to intentional moves by Greg Halpern. For that reason, it cannot be bought or sold expect through specific traders. Therefore, the reason to be pushing for immediate answers, after 14 years of wandering the barren financial wastelands of Zimbabwe, is transparent.

[jay14]

I agree on what was posted in this statement....

Greg Halpern is no longer CEO.
Focus on new leadership, Vechery.

Btw
MAFIP in Minnesota
is affiliated with
MAFIP LIMITED AU!!!!

It's called a field or more often a satellite office....

[Alfred11]

Bankrupt con artist GH and his son in law will be answering to criminal complaints with the Court after he is unmasked and the Formula 4 con is laid out to the Court. He thought he was marrying into a rich family, but he got conned into a bankrupt, criminal family. Kylie and her husband seem like nice people, but they are just like GH. Trade anything for a buck

[jay14]

Are you saying Harvey Vechery's agenda

will be to just run the price up and then bail out????

I have no idea what work shareholders think should be done on "The App", but they all seem to blindly believe that it contains technology which defies the laws of physics. Since the vast majority of people are not invested in MAXD,
they're less inclined to fall for these ridiculous claims.

Harvey Vechery's agenda,
with help,
now makes sense....

[jay14]

Didn't Harvey Vechery say;
Greg Halpern is off the hook....

I'm not sure why we're still posting about
the Former CEO of MAXD

when we should be addressing, and focusing in on
the future
of this company....
It's been 4 weeks

And
no news yet....

Wake me up when September ends....

[grantastic]

"The App" has been removed from stores years ago.

Even when it was brand new, "The App" was a sub-par music player with effectively no users and never had any chance of making money.

It's obvious that "The App" was developed for under $100,000 by an offshore development firm. It's the kind of software that an enthusiastic programmer could build in under a month.

This is why there's literally dozens of far superior music players available for free in the app stores: because dozens of enthusiastic developers have indeed written a large number of music players as passion projects.

I have no idea what work shareholders think should be done on "The App", but they all seem to blindly believe that it contains technology which defies the laws of physics. Since the vast majority of people are not invested in MAXD, they're less inclined to fall for these ridiculous claims.

Thank God for that. Given the damage that the incompetent little runt man has done to MAXD and it’s shareholders, Vechery’s new team of competent MEN, not little high school failures stuck in karate class, but real MEN are already at work on the core part of the business, the MAXD app, which if I hear correctly, has basically been left untouched by the little incompetent runt man (and “little” was confirmed by his girlfriend)

[grantastic]

So you admit that MAXD when run by Greg Halpern needed "fixing" in multiple "aspects"

Harvey Vechery, technically, at this time,

it's his responsibility

to fix every aspect of the company....

[uber darthium]

Thank God for that. Given the damage that the incompetent little runt man has done to MAXD and it’s shareholders, Vechery’s new team of competent MEN, not little high school failures stuck in karate class, but real MEN are already at work on the core part of the business, the MAXD app, which if I hear correctly, has basically been left untouched by the little incompetent runt man (and “little” was confirmed by his girlfriend)

Good times ahead for MAXD

The Japanese PR was a hilarious attempt

[jay14]

Harvey Vechery, technically, at this time,

it's his responsibility

to fix every aspect of the company....

[grantastic]

Why?

Waiting on Harvey Vechery's agenda

[uber darthium]

That was a nice PR yesterday with the ???? to identify to unknown scam Halpern accomplice but what is even funnier the Japanese do not speak like American English. Native Japanese word grouping doesn’t align itself with American English.

If the author or that SCAM PR wanted to have any legitimacy, the words chosen and their use would be completely different

But we already knew that…

[grantastic]

It is impossible for you to have purchased MAXD stock on the open market for less than its current market value.

Any "profits" someone made from MAXD stock was by selling shares at the same time as management was trying to convince people to buy shares.

i.e. by knowing that this company was a sham, destined for failure

[jay14]

It's more like a chapter out of Atlas Shrugged....lol

[J Galt]

How does a company separate from MAXD when there was no contract between them in the first place? A contract would have been classified as a material change to be followed by the required 8-K with the SEC. As there were no filings indicating contractual agreements of any kind, was there really a need for the “company with no name” to issue a press release announcing a separation and end of contract? Or was it all just subterfuge to support the agenda?

[J Galt]

I was reading the EIN Presswire MAXD release again last night and had a few thoughts and questions. Based on this ruling from the court; “defendant Halpern, and anyone acting in concert with him, are permanently enjoined and restrained from, directly or indirectly, by use of any means or instrumentalities….,” it’s obvious the “Japanese symbol” company wanted to get ahead of any legal issues by publicly separating from MAXD and, in my opinion, that was a prudent legal move.

“????? Ends Business Relation with Max Sound Corp in the United Kingdom Japan and Asia.” SHIBUYA, TOKYO, JAPAN, May 22, 2023/EINPresswire.com/ -- Via ????? hereby notified to all parties and affiliations, the company has ended its collaboration with Max Sound Corp.

My first question is about using the Japanese symbols “?????” for the company name in a global press release. Or for that matter, any marketing purposes. Well-known Asian companies such as Sony, Nissan, Toyota, and others use a name that can be read and promoted in any language. Also, easy to remember. Maybe this symbol is the Asian version of Nike’s swoosh logo, but it just seems strange for a new company wanting to be remembered. The rest of the release is in English, so why not the English translation for the name? Most marketing strategists develop logos and slogans for new companies or products that are easily identifiable, especially when their product is going global. If the press release was for Japan alone I could understand, but we live in a global market now, so the logic escapes me. Open for input on this one.

I also found this wording interesting; “with sincerity," the "company’s executive” had the pleasure of working with former Max Sound Corp CEO Greg Halpern in “pursuing” a very lucrative deal in Japan.” The company executive, CEO, or communications director is typically identified and named in this type of release. A person to identify with instead of just words. A person “in charge” who can be applauded, or blamed, for the decision. Why is the person being omitted from this release and being referred to as “the company executive.” If it’s Rurouni, name him by his real name. If it’s the high school kid, same thing. Name the person making the comments. Otherwise it doesn’t seem real.

This PR reads more like someone crafting a message for a purpose other than informing the public. It’s more resume and foundation building at the same time. I don’t think the phrase, “had the pleasure of working with” has been uttered, in reference to Halpern, in many years, if ever. Other than in one’s own memoirs that is. I’ve heard just the opposite of those involved with Halpern. To the foundation building comment, once again, “very lucrative deal in Japan” indicates there was a deal and it was financially rewarding for MAXD shareholders. There is no proof of either an LOI. a signed deal, or any pending revenue, so it is not real. No public LOI, no contract, no money or stock changing hands, no deal. However, the key word “pursuing” was used in the sentence which would imply they were still chasing plush bunny profits and no deal was ever achieved.

This is another interesting statement; “Due to an unforeseen event, ????? can no longer represent MAX-D HD AUDIO platform.” How can an “event” be unforeseen when it has been in the public domain for so long? Halpern knew about the lawsuit as he and his minions were constantly making fun of it online. I believe Halpern also posted about it in his infamous fantastical 8K. Not to mention on his Hoodwinkers website He never assigned, or sent, an attorney to court to defend his case. Any rational businessman would know you can’t win a case when you don’t show. He didn’t show for the January judgment, so he had to know what was coming. The point is that the lawsuit news was out there and should have been planned for by all involved. “Unforeseen event?” The judgment was granted on January 11. The relief wasn’t granted until April 28th and posted on May 18th . That’s almost over four months of time to prepare for an event. As I’ve stated before, Halpern or Team Rurouni should have contacted Vechery to work out some form of deal if this business was real. If Team Rurouni was not informed of the case or not prepared for the result, then that’s on Halpern. Maybe Halpern was “waiting on Rurouni” to save the day, but that obviously didn’t happen.

One other question about this Japan deal, Greg Halpern loves making late night videos. Where are the videos for the plush bunny deal? Where are the photos of Rurouni working with the A grade high school student? Where are the PowerPoint presentations? Voice recordings of Rurouni?

The bottom line? It’s my opinion that this press release was prepared in the Halpern think tank and written by Greg Halpern himself, in order to save face, avoid sanctions from the court, and use key phrases to add to his imaginary lawsuit. Prove me wrong.

[J Galt]

I’m assuming the “Harvey Vechery agenda,” as it’s being continuously referred to as on this board, will be part of an official press release when he is ready to make one. Addressing him directly on this board, through me, is irrational as I don’t communicate with him. As I’ve stated in several posts, there are legal steps to go through before notifying shareholders and the general public. That legal process is underway. Anyone suggesting the legal team should force the process for the sake of speed, would be asking for the same legal chaos we’ve been living through for 14 years under Halpern. As far as I know, there are certain legal moves that must be made before filings can be completed.

Every shareholder has a right to know what’s going on, but not to be misinformed. Due to Greg Halpern’s intentional move to have MAXD dropped to the Expert Market, investors and shareholder are severely limited in buying or selling stock right now. For that reason, I’m wondering, why the daily demand for filings and PRs from the Halpernettes? It seems like forever since we’ve had either for MAXD. 14 years of non-production from Greg Halpern, not to mention past due filings based on a fantastical 8K, and he has his team making demands for instantaneous information from the new group. I think people can see through that strategy.

Once again, comments such as this appear to be nothing more than setting the stage for a lawsuit from Halpern. Or an attempt to get me to speak on behalf of someone I don’t know.

[Utuse]

Mr HV,
What is the agenda and where is the 10K?