Another statement from the Honorable Judge Timothy Taylor; “Halpern’s Misrepresentations Regarding the Business of Max Sound,” is worth remembering whenever you read something directly, or indirectly attributed to Greg & the Halpernettes, as well as anything they say about…..anything. “Misrepresentations.”
“More hearsay; where is this in any filing or report???? Vechery has indicated he is prepared to invest the necessary money in ...engineering to get everything up to speed and running. Whom has Harvey Vechery talked to about this plan.” “where's the filing stating that Harvey Vechery plans on investing in the technology, which is now being reported as not being concrete????”
There are no filings or reports yet as there are legal issues being cleaned up behind the scenes. When information is not available, one must use their imagination, as all MAXD shareholders have been doing for years. For instance, imagine an NCIS episode where hotel management enters a room Halpern had previously rented only to find it trashed and in need of repair. As the police believed a crime had been committed, they yellow taped the room and no one could enter until their forensic work was completed. Once that work was completed, no one could put their name on the room until the trash was taken out, the floors and walls were cleaned, the furniture back in place, and the room fumigated due to the odor left behind. Translate that into corporate terms and the board poster will have the answer as to the filing schedule. The board poster will also see the official report and filing the same time I do and everyone else does.
Until the company issues an official statement naming a new CEO, and that CEO states the new game plan, everything mentioned about MAXD will fall under the “hearsay” category. Unless you were on the inside and involved directly with the principles, most of the posts about MAXD over the last few years would qualify as “hearsay.” The comment is right, beach counselor, it is hearsay. I “HEARD” from another person that Harvey Vechery plans to invest money back into the company and get it up and running. In English, that is an “indication” of an action. A sign, a suggestion, a signal, or a hint of actions yet to come. It is not, however, an official proclamation, or even a “concrete” report from anyone within the company. It is also hearsay because, as I have stated all along, I don’t have any contact with Harvey Vechery. The attempt to accuse someone of spreading insider information is transparent. Not to mention, lame. By the way, where did one “hear” that it would cost “$150-$200k” to upgrade the product? Where did the board poster hear about the claims about the house? Hearsay is defined as: “A statement which a witness has heard another person say, or a written statement offered in evidence without producing the author to testify as to the issues stated.” Until an officer of the company is named and he/she makes a statement, it is all hearsay. I guess what’s good for the goose is not always good for the gander.
AI
