I was reading the EIN Presswire MAXD release again last night and had a few thoughts and questions. Based on this ruling from the court; “defendant Halpern, and anyone acting in concert with him, are permanently enjoined and restrained from, directly or indirectly, by use of any means or instrumentalities….,” it’s obvious the “Japanese symbol” company wanted to get ahead of any legal issues by publicly separating from MAXD and, in my opinion, that was a prudent legal move.
“????? Ends Business Relation with Max Sound Corp in the United Kingdom Japan and Asia.” SHIBUYA, TOKYO, JAPAN, May 22, 2023/EINPresswire.com/ -- Via ????? hereby notified to all parties and affiliations, the company has ended its collaboration with Max Sound Corp.
My first question is about using the Japanese symbols “?????” for the company name in a global press release. Or for that matter, any marketing purposes. Well-known Asian companies such as Sony, Nissan, Toyota, and others use a name that can be read and promoted in any language. Also, easy to remember. Maybe this symbol is the Asian version of Nike’s swoosh logo, but it just seems strange for a new company wanting to be remembered. The rest of the release is in English, so why not the English translation for the name? Most marketing strategists develop logos and slogans for new companies or products that are easily identifiable, especially when their product is going global. If the press release was for Japan alone I could understand, but we live in a global market now, so the logic escapes me. Open for input on this one.
I also found this wording interesting; “with sincerity," the "company’s executive” had the pleasure of working with former Max Sound Corp CEO Greg Halpern in “pursuing” a very lucrative deal in Japan.” The company executive, CEO, or communications director is typically identified and named in this type of release. A person to identify with instead of just words. A person “in charge” who can be applauded, or blamed, for the decision. Why is the person being omitted from this release and being referred to as “the company executive.” If it’s Rurouni, name him by his real name. If it’s the high school kid, same thing. Name the person making the comments. Otherwise it doesn’t seem real.
This PR reads more like someone crafting a message for a purpose other than informing the public. It’s more resume and foundation building at the same time. I don’t think the phrase, “had the pleasure of working with” has been uttered, in reference to Halpern, in many years, if ever. Other than in one’s own memoirs that is. I’ve heard just the opposite of those involved with Halpern. To the foundation building comment, once again, “very lucrative deal in Japan” indicates there was a deal and it was financially rewarding for MAXD shareholders. There is no proof of either an LOI. a signed deal, or any pending revenue, so it is not real. No public LOI, no contract, no money or stock changing hands, no deal. However, the key word “pursuing” was used in the sentence which would imply they were still chasing plush bunny profits and no deal was ever achieved.
This is another interesting statement; “Due to an unforeseen event, ????? can no longer represent MAX-D HD AUDIO platform.” How can an “event” be unforeseen when it has been in the public domain for so long? Halpern knew about the lawsuit as he and his minions were constantly making fun of it online. I believe Halpern also posted about it in his infamous fantastical 8K. Not to mention on his Hoodwinkers website He never assigned, or sent, an attorney to court to defend his case. Any rational businessman would know you can’t win a case when you don’t show. He didn’t show for the January judgment, so he had to know what was coming. The point is that the lawsuit news was out there and should have been planned for by all involved. “Unforeseen event?” The judgment was granted on January 11. The relief wasn’t granted until April 28th and posted on May 18th . That’s almost over four months of time to prepare for an event. As I’ve stated before, Halpern or Team Rurouni should have contacted Vechery to work out some form of deal if this business was real. If Team Rurouni was not informed of the case or not prepared for the result, then that’s on Halpern. Maybe Halpern was “waiting on Rurouni” to save the day, but that obviously didn’t happen.
One other question about this Japan deal, Greg Halpern loves making late night videos. Where are the videos for the plush bunny deal? Where are the photos of Rurouni working with the A grade high school student? Where are the PowerPoint presentations? Voice recordings of Rurouni?
The bottom line? It’s my opinion that this press release was prepared in the Halpern think tank and written by Greg Halpern himself, in order to save face, avoid sanctions from the court, and use key phrases to add to his imaginary lawsuit. Prove me wrong.
AI
