Max Sound Corporation (MAXD)

[jay14]

Fact: Harvey Vechery is new leadership!!!!

Fact: No word from new leadership since May 1,
And
actually Harvey Vechery knew this was coming,
when he lost the monetary case!!!!
Shares v shares lol

MAXD shareholders,
are talks happening, imo yes,
but
I'm sure copy and paste,
with so much anger is coming,
because there isn't anything else to do
but rehash yesteryears stories....

I know, annoying, especially when it is irrelevant information today!!!!
New leadership:
Get over it!!!!

Be happy....
It really annoys negative people....

[J Galt]

“Halpern has engaged in conduct in his capacity as a director of defendant Max Sound constituting fraudulent or dishonest acts or gross abuse of authority or discretion with reference to the corporation.” Those words, included in the judgment signed by the Honorable Judge Timothy Taylor, are not “excuses,” nor are they “distractions from the truth.” They are the words of the court carved in legal stone. Shareholders should keep these words in mind when reading about the imaginary “live” phone conversations described by Halpern.

What would be “relevant” is for the content of each post to be analyzed and debated. The words are important. Not condescending titles or adolescent insults. Why is it that each time comments are posted the attack is directed at the messenger instead of addressing the actual message that was posted? It’s nothing more than classic Halpern deflection. Don’t have answers to the hard questions? Deflect by pointing the bony finger in any direction. The IHUB readers and MAXD shareholders who contact me are not fooled by this tactic.

Empty rhetoric will never win the hearts and minds of shareholders and investors. That want the truth. They want facts. 14 years of false promotions, failed relationships, and fake news made sure of that fact. As far as the court was concerned, that’s three “F’s” and you’re out. The word of Greg Halpern has been weighed and measured. That means his words no longer carries weight, and he is not trusted as a messenger.

[jay14]

Ex, censored transfer agent is trying
to be relevant to no end....

Excuses only excuses and nothing else....

[J Galt]

“Why would minions try to run from the talks???? “ The so called “minions” aren’t running from the talks, they aren’t involved in the talks, because there aren’t any talks going on!

I can only speak for myself as I am not part of any coordinated group working in concert. But I know there are no talks going on. Tenchi is not in the Vechery loop so he wouldn’t know anyway. Nor is Rurouni. Halpern is also not in the Vechery loop anymore so anything he states is a complete fabrication designed to benefit a party of one. Greg Halpern. .

[J Galt]

“Distracting shareholders from the truth?” Only Greg & The Halpernettes could take a simple message and twist it around to their benefit. As I clearly stated, ignore the messenger. In other words, ignore me. I don’t count. I’m fine with that as who I am is not important. What is important is what Halpern wants everyone to ignore. The message.

What is the message? That Greg Halpern is a serial fabricator. The he makes up his own “individual truths” as it suits him. The message is the truth exposing Halpern for the manipulator and deceiver he has become. That's why he wants everyone to ignore the truth in the message. The point is that talks are not happening. This is a fabrication designed to make Greg appear to be relevant and ultimately making Vechery look bad because “talks broke down.” Talks that never happened.

The point is that Greg Halpern is still using his Formula Four Protocols to invent his own reality. A reality that doesn’t exist for the rest of us.

[MD1941]

Halpern is trying to deflect attention away from the fact that he destroyed MAXD. We all know that MAXD is in this situation because of one man. Only one person is responsible for destroying MAXD.

How is it possible that he couldn't even get one real deal in fourteen years? It's possible because nobody wanted to deal with his crazy ramblings. Who wouldn't be spooked after hearing about aliens and his thirteen lives?

[J Galt]

Posting information countering a false narrative has nothing to do with me being relevant. It’s not about me and never has been. I am irrelevant, but the information I post is not. It’s about ensuring shareholders aren’t fed self-serving information designed to paint Greg Halpern in a positive light when that light is undeserving.

There are no conversations going on between Halpern and the Vechery group so why post a link to that information as if it’s relevant? Why deceive the shareholders into believing something is happening when it is not?

Once again, I am not “Harvey Vechery’s minion” as I don’t know the man, have never worked for the man, have never talked to the man, and am not taking instructions from Vechery or anyone else. I’m nobody’s minion, I am a lone wolf.

Once again, I am not important. I am not relevant and am not trying to be. I am simply a messenger and nothing more. However, the truth is important, and the message is relevant. Read the words and ignore the messenger.

[jay14]

Harvey Vechery's minion trying to be relevant
but
continues to be irrelevant!!!!

[J Galt]

“With nothing burgers being served up, now....” The words written by the judge in the Final Order are not “nothing burgers.” They must be adhered to. Halpern already appears to be in breach of the court order by making false statements about conversations concerning future business of MAXD when said conversations have not happened. By making claims online that Harvey and Greg are having “live discussion between H. Vechery Scott and Greg Halpern everything will restart again.” Halpern is apparently in violation of the court order by making false claims.

"FYI A. B. C. Don't mean a thing, if HV okays it...." Vechery can’t just “okay it.” Even he would have to go back to court and open a new case. Why in the world would he do that? After Hoodwinkers and the new website, not to mention the false claims about live discussions on mafip, Vechery has little incentive to trust Halpern in any area.

"I'm guessing, probably why it's still pending, but that me.... The uneducated one...." There is nothing pending in reference to imaginary meetings so that guess is inaccurate. Education is an evolutionary process we are all part of. The point of being exposed to new material is so we can examine new evidence and reevaluate our opinions. My opinions have evolved over time as new information becomes available. The problem is when people refuse to accept factual information and alter their stance on the issues.

[J Galt]

“Harvey Vechery and Greg Halpern are supposedly talking!!!! I'll wait to see who is correct, and not jump to conclusions....”

So, it’s “supposedly” talking now. They are not, supposedly, or otherwise. The board poster has already jumped to conclusions in past posts without waiting to see who is correct. It’s not a contest to me, I’m just reporting the facts.

What is it that Halpern doesn’t understand about the Final Order from the court? It is an official judgment by the court. Halpern did not contest it. It is a judgement that prevents Halpern from serving in any official capacity for MAXD. Including imaginary negotiations with Harvey and Scott. Along with “anyone acting in concert with him. And he wants shareholders to believe he is having live conversations with Harvey on behalf of MAXD on mafip?

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED THAT:
Thus, based on the foregoing factual findings and for good cause, pursuant to Corporations Code § 304 and the equitable authority of this Court, defendant Halpern, and anyone acting in concert with him, are permanently enjoined and restrained from, directly or indirectly, by use of any means or instrumentalities:

A. Serving as a director of Max Sound for a period of five (5) years. Moreover, Halpern is hereby ordered removed as a director of Max Sound as of the issuance of this Judgment.
B. Seeking reelection as a director of Max Sound for a period of five (5) years.
C. Making false statements about his relationship with Max Sound, including by holding himself out a director, officer, or agent of Max Sound.

[jay14]

Rogue minion in denial, makes sense....

Harvey Vechery and Greg Halpern are supposedly talking!!!!

I'll wait to see who is correct, and not jump to conclusions....

Sad,
ex, censored transfer agent still trying to climb
up that hill....

H. Vechery
and Greg Halpern
in the upcoming filings
This must be heartbreaking to some....
Me,
waiting to read them....

[J Galt]

There are no conversations going on between Harvey Vechery, Scott Kapp, and Greg Halpern. This is an intentionally deceptive approach designed to fool shareholders into believing Greg Halpern is still a relevant part of the conversation. He is not.

Keep this statement in mind as you continue to read; “At best, Halpern has revealed himself to be a chronically dishonest and incompetent director who performs no diligence when engaging with third parties on behalf of the corporation, resulting in conflicting and illegal dealings.” Furthermore, “the evidence plainly reveals that Halpern is unfit to serve as a director of the corporation, cannot proceed in his management without breaching his fiduciary duties and cannot stop himself from engaging in stock manipulations that continues to mislead shareholders and prospective investors. In fact, manipulation and abuse is all that Halpern has done for Max Sound, given that publicly available corporate filings (which were prepared by Halpern) reveal that Max Sound has had virtually zero business in recent years except for self-interested transactions with other companies associated with Halpern.”

These are the words in the judgment that the court agreed with before issuing the Final Order. Formula Four Principles aside, just because you desperately want something to be true doesn’t make it so.

Halpern wants shareholders to believe there are conversations going on for his own self-serving reasons. Once again, just because he wants it to be doesn’t mean it’s true. His only avenue for income is to extort or sue the man with the money. He said so himself when he stated, “ Greg Halpern needs H. Vechery resources to move Max Sound forward.” He could have just stopped at “Greg Halpern needs H. Vechery’s money,” Once again, just because he needs it doesn’t mean he’ll get it.

The former transfer agent was never censored. He is a legitimate shareholder. The board poster, and his master, no longer have access to the NOBO list so “they” wouldn’t know anyway. The stock was registered and legitimate. Halpern knows this. But as always is the case, the Halpern team has no relationship with the truth. His desire is to bring all those contradicting him down to his level so he can tarnish their reputation. Claiming the stock is somehow “illegitimate,” and referring to imaginary censorship allows Halpern to claim superiority of messaging in his mind. Formula Four mind tactics again. Coming from a man with the checkered past Halpern has on the record, including being booted from MAXD by the judge for “looting the shareholders,” is rich considering the man himself might be considered an illegitimate shareholder.

Whether any shareholder wants “Harvey Vechery and Greg Halpern talking with each other....” or not is irrelevant as we have nothing to do with their actions. What they do is up to them. But Halpern reporting they were having “live conversations” about future business is not true. Not to mention against the court order. Twisting that comment around to claim shareholders are against imaginary conversations is nothing more than the master of deflection, Greg Halpern, attempting to make claims for his imaginary lawsuit.

[jay14]

It's surprising that non legitimate shareholders,
censored transfer agent, with others

does not want

Harvey Vechery
and Greg Halpern talking with each other....

Simply amazing and hilarious, simultaneously....

I remember seeing a post from ex censored transfer agent
saying,
careful what you wish for
Yes!!!!

[jay14]

Harvey Vechery is new leadership....

[Utuse]

Ask the HV team.

And for clarity:
Foreign = Minnesota

[Kracker Jones]

When are the filings ?

[J Galt]

“ A little bump on the way that things had to be cleared out without affecting the insiders legally.” Another veiled threat reminder from Halpern to Vechery disguised as an innocent comment. Nice try Greg.

This post is nothing more than Halpern attempting to mislead shareholders into believing he is showing good faith by negotiating with Harvey and Scott. When it doesn’t work out, he will paint them as unnegotiable and inconsiderate of the shareholders investments. He will attempt to portray himself as a man of the people, working to salvage the company for the working class. That will be part of his basis for the lawsuit, designed to bring Halpern the money he couldn’t earn through legitimate means.

This is also another attempt to get shareholders, including this one, to serve up personal information to mafip, which I have no intention of doing. If these recordings were legitimate, they would be posted on YouTube, Reddit, or on Halpern’s personal blackmail websites.

Why do you think they are not posted on these websites? Could it be the long arm of the law has a much more powerful reach within these borders?

Shareholders are each allowed to believe whatever they choose to, but please think outside the box on this one and don’t fall for the Halpernesque subterfuge.

[J Galt]

It's important to know the background to all statements made. “This isn't a surprise, H. Vechery and Greg Halpern in the upcoming filings.”

Before I get to the meat and potatoes of the post, let’s start out with a reminder of the legal statement made by the Honorable Judge Timothy Taylor: “defendant Halpern, and anyone acting in concert with him, are permanently enjoined and restrained from, directly or indirectly, by use of any means or instrumentalities: C. Making false statements about his relationship with Max Sound, including by holding himself out a director, officer, or agent of Max Sound.”

In other words, making false statements about his relationship with Max Sound is a violation of the court order. That includes “anyone acting in concert with him.” Those words have been weighed and measured. Words have meaning so anyone posting statements might want to consider that fact.

Now to the post. Harvey and Scott are not in communication with Greg Halpern in any way, shape, or form. Any audio clips presented as “live discussions” between the parties are nothing more than illegally recorded audio from past phone conversations, cut and edited by Halpern to fit his transparent agenda. Just as Halpern did with his fake Donald Trump stage appearance.

Halpern has been threatening on his hoodwinkers site to start dropping his illegal audio recordings for some time now, so what better place to do it than an unmonitored, uncontrolled, foreign website.

The idea that Harvey Vechery would consider a reconciliation with Greg Halpern after the defamatory, slanderous, and libelous comments made on the Hoodwinkers website, the new Halpern website, and on the boards, is not based in reality. But isn’t that the description of Halpern’s years at the helm of MAXD, not based in reality?

This is the only statement in the post that’s based in reality; “ Greg Halpern needs H. Vechery resources to move Max Sound forward.” True. Without Vechery’s money, Halpern has no chance of doing anything. I doubt anyone else would fund Halpern in any busines with his recent track record.

[jay14]

This isn't a surprise,

H. Vechery
and Greg Halpern
in the upcoming filings

https://www.openweb.com/share/2S1Nz7kOkJog3gaR0pFLuUyQYDg

[jay14]

Don't tell me that but this poster disagrees....lol
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=172127330

[grantastic]

Greg Halpern is still the CEO of MAXD.

Why would anyone trust a random anonymous internet poster to be more accurate than the signed public filings from MAXD?

Years of Greg Halpern's lies being endlessly exposed should have taught everyone including yourself not to trust unsupported claims about MAXD, especially from internet strangers.

It is now Harvey Vechery's responsibility to fix every aspect of MAXD!!!!

[jay14]

Clowns make between 40k to 60k,
and
here
Harvey Vechery's minions post for free!!!!

[J Galt]

\“all legitimate MAXD shareholders want to see progress, as do shorts and mm's....” Shorts and MM’s? Are you serious? You intentionally placed the company on the Expert Market! And you want to go back to the “shorts” excuse?

“Hey professor it's not the falsehoods, it's the same old drawn out verbiage of yesteryear....” There are no falsehoods to report. That’s why the poster never accepts the challenge. It would be convenient for Greg Halpern to have everyone forget the past as it makes for a very ugly story, with all chapters starting and ending with Halpern. Of course he wants it to go away.

“I think professor missed on this one too.... Still no response on those words, indicating Vechery was in deed investing in, and upgrading the company's technology and engineering side....” Reading comprehension issues have been talked about many times in the past. Halpern makes accusations in this area but needs to look in the mirror. I’ve already dealt with this issue.


“Interesting, now we don't want MAXD to move forward with talks between Harvey Vechery and Greg Halpern.... That makes sense in minions world.... So angry at former CEO;( perhaps more fiber is needed in the diet....” No one that I‘ve heard, or any post I’ve read, said we didn’t want MAXD to go forward. That would be convenient for your planned lawsuit, but it doesn’t pass the smell test.

Shareholders want a return on their investment. They weren’t going to get that with Halpern. I believe the main reason Halpern was forced out of the company was that Harvey Vechery and the shareholders wanted the company to go forward without him. Most of us believe the company was not going anywhere under Halpern and wanted to start over. That’s completely different from suggesting we wanted the company to fail. I don’t believe anyone said they didn’t want talks to go forward between Vechery and Halpern either. It us just a major stretch of the imagination to believe Vechery would subject himself to that abuse twice over. I would venture to say most shareholders don’t believe they are talking about business right now anyway.

[J Galt]

“I believe Greg Halpern has abused his relationship with Vechery too many times for him to forgive and forget.”

Maybe the truth hurts. Greg Halpern “looted” the shareholders. The judge said that when he removed Halpern from the company. Halpern owes Vechery millions of dollars. Halpern lied to Vechery and manipulated him. Halpern registered websites and posted defamatory statements about Vechery. Halpern used slander, libel, and the tactics his ex-girlfriend described in her deposition, “bullying, retaliation, retribution, extortion plots, and blackmail” in an attempt to extort money from Vechery. He has his ex-girlfriend dig up dirt on Vechery that Halpern could use. Her words.

Vechery spent time, effort, and probably a great deal of money removing Halpern from the company. And now he’s going to set that all aside and forget who caused all that pain? Let me just ask the question outright, for anyone to answer. Why would Harvey Vechery want to do business with a man with no morals, ethics, or values? You don’t have to have a personal relationship with Harvey Vechery to know that there would be hesitancy to work with someone who has already caused him to lose so much money. Along with all the associated mental anguish.

[J Galt]

“Funny, it is now second hand news from another source, which is more hearsay.... I can probably guess whom that is....” How can the board poster be making guesses about the supposed source? I thought he was just a beach barrister. How would he know? Unless Halpern is emailing again. ??

It has always been secondhand news. I have repeatedly stated I have never met or talked to Harvey Vechery. Therefore, how could it be anything but secondhand? The greater question, which for some reason seems to be hard to understand, is why would Harvey not be investing in the product? Why is this news to the poster? Why would the news be “deceptive?” It’s very plain. The man who took over the technology company MUST invest in the product because it’s been dormant for years. MAXD had no business. MAXD has no business. Nobody believes the plush bunny business, imaginary mining deals, and Mexican Land Deals were real. It’s just more Pleiadean poppycock. The MAXD technology is out of date. If there is no business to build on, no business in the pipeline, and the tech is outdated, one has no choice but to invest in the product. If Halpern believes he has found some loophole in all this gobbledygook for a lawsuit, good luck with that.

[jay14]

Funny, it is now second hand news from another source,

which is more hearsay....

I can probably guess whom that is....

There's a party of three,
or so that could be serving up deceptive news....

The problem seems to be
Harvey Vechery
and Greg Halpern
talking now....
There is so much anger that it's clouding the future....

That's being treated as it's never going to happen....

Imo
I think it is happening
and
you're correct, professor
all legitimate MAXD shareholders want to see progress,
as do shorts and mm's....

It isn't going to happen with remarks of yesteryear,
especially if they do team up to move this company forward....

If you can't agree with that then there's another agenda....

[jay14]

Hey professor it's not the falsehoods,
it's the same old drawn out verbiage of yesteryear....

New leadership but
ex transfer agent continues to try and make sense to being or
getting friends duped....

8K is in order,
if
new leadership(HV)
would ever contact the accountant perhaps they could explain simple logic....


Classic Comedy
Yeppers, And
a little soft shoe too....lol

[jay14]

“ex transfer agent” censored is the poster I'm replying to....
lol
Remember Glendale Holdings....

Interesting,
now we don't want MAXD to move forward
with talks between
Harvey Vechery and
Greg Halpern....
That makes sense in minions world....
So angry at former CEO;(
perhaps more fiber is needed in the diet....

I like this one
I believe Greg Halpern has abused his relationship with Vechery too many times for him to forgive and forget

I think professor missed on this one too....

Still no response on those words,
indicating
Vechery was in deed investing in, and
upgrading the company's technology and engineering side....

Hearsay, most likely....

[J Galt]

“Purveyor of the truth lol now that's rich, And funny at the same time.... More like purveyor of misdirection!!!!” Once again, I’m happy to amuse all board readers with my words but I would ask anyone who believes I am posting falsehoods to point them out. One by one. Copy and paste at will. Each time I ask this request it’s ignored, and comments are made about unrelated issues. That’s called misdirection.

When I requested to “spell out” the answer, I get a sarcastic response instead. I appreciate sarcasm but I would like it to be connected to reality. As to misdirection, Halpern is the master of misdirection, as each post demonstrates. Shareholders were misdirected from one deal to the next for 14 years, all without accountability. Always “forget about the past, lets move on to the next deal!” The 8-K was a complete and total misdirection. Talk about “being rich and funny,” misdirection comments aimed at others by the Halpern team is classic comedy.

[J Galt]

“Actual legitimate MAXD shareholders would like to hear about Harvey Vechery's agenda where as it was being reported that Harvey Vechery had indicated he was investing in the company and the engineering.... (your words)

Yes. Those are my words. As I’ve said several times, Harvey Vechery indicated he was investing in the company, the engineering, and upgrading the outdated technology. As I have also asked several times, what is wrong with that? It is logical to invest in your company’s product. To expand on that thought, anyone involved in a technology company must invest in the technology, as that is the product. As Halpern chose to invest money into the Google suit instead of back into the company technology, Vechery has no choice but to invest money into the company, as he has been for several years. Why does the board poster have an issue with that? And yes, I have never talked with Harvey Vechery so it is most definitely hearsay. Why? because I heard it from a source not named Harvey Vechery. I didn’t question the concept of investing in your own company as it made logical sense to me to do so. Business 101. Once again, I ask, why does the board poster have a problem with Harvey investing in the company?

[J Galt]

“I wonder what the mood will be, IF Harvey Vechery and Greg Halpern do get back together....” I thought I’d start from the bottom this time. Call it the Halpern level. Harvey and Greg get back together? To borrow a movie line from Gangs of New York, “That will only happen in the reign of Queen Dick. That means it will never happen.” I believe Greg Halpern has abused his relationship with Vechery too many times for him to forgive and forget. Halpern may think Vechery is a businessman who places the pursuit of money over all else, but not everyone is like Halpern. Greg can try and fool everyone into believing he is “having live conversations with Harvey and Scott” about the plush bunny business on a foreign website but it’s just another fantasy.

By the way, the person you constantly refer to as the “ex transfer agent” is still a transfer agent, was never censored, and owns MAXD stock. Therefore, the poster is wrong on all three fronts, while the “ex transfer agent” is legitimate in all ways. Facts over feelings.

[jay14]

Uneducated provocateur;) lol hey batter, hey batter hey batter, swing....
Miss!!!!

Purveyor of the truth lol now that's rich,
And funny at the same time....
More like purveyor of misdirection!!!!

Actual legitimate MAXD shareholders
would like to hear about
Harvey Vechery's agenda where as it
was being reported that Harvey Vechery had indicated he was investing in the company and
the engineering....
(your words)

Or just more hearsay for the ones benefit,

that were duped

by
an ex censored transfer agent????

I wonder what the mood will be,
IF
Harvey Vechery and Greg Halpern
do get back together....

Dissect away....

[jay14]

Still trying to be relevant.... It's not working....

Nothing here, just another poop sandwich from
an ex, angry,
censored transfer agent....


I've heard Psychological means mental or emotional rather than physical....

It must be truth,
with
copy and paste specialist,
dissecting adjectives and adverbs....

[Coo breeze]

6 k shares traded. were they buys . If they were then someone is in the know

[J Galt]

“No one cares about yesteryears gibberish, except non legitimate shareholders!!!!”

Once again, the “non legitimate shareholder” claim. Even after I just debunked that point. No response to the comments in my post, just more of the same. The definition of insanity is “doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result.” To paraphrase Albert Einstein’s famous comment in relation to this board, “stating the same thing over and over again, in a post, and expecting a different answer” is a board version of illogical thinking, or in this case, insanity. But that’s our favorite board Cyanocitta Cristata, continuing to post the same words and phases over and over again, and expecting new answers to the same old questions.

My point? The shares are owned and registered. That makes them legitimate. The “flavor of the day” is still former CEO Greg Halpern because he is the cause of the sour taste everyone has in their mouths. He is the cause of all the turmoil with MAXD. He is the reason the company is in debt and on the Expert Market. He is the reason the battle with Harvey Vechery started in the first place because he disrespected and cheated his angel investor after he bailed Halpern out of bankruptcy. Vechery would probably still be loaning Halpern and MAXD money if Greg hadn’t lied, cheated, defamed, and slandered his so called “friend for decades.” Every MAXD shareholder is in this losing position because Halpern put us here. Greg Halpern “broke” the company and that is why Halpern is expecting Harvey Vechery to fix it on Halpern’s timetable.

The reason Halpern is still the “flavor of the day,” is because he not only continues to post lies on his Hoodwinkers website, and on the boards, but he has also registered two new sites and is continuing down the completely unethical and immoral legal road to nowhere. Except in this case, the road leads to a place he never imagined.

If Greg Halpern doesn’t want to continue to be the topic of conversation, he could start by admitting his transgressions and changing his ways. He should contact Harvey directly instead of having imaginary conversations with him on a foreign chat board.

By the way, there was a post from earlier this morning where my words were quoted from a post earlier this month. The calendar clearly showed the court schedule. Six months? The judgment was in January. The relief hearing was in April, the court ruling was in May. I understand the chronology of a calendar is hard, but May 18 to June 29 is not six months, it’s not even six weeks. The Vechery team was limited by the court until the May 18 final order was processed and published. As soon as Greg was legally out, they could then start looking under the hood. It’s nice to throw words out but they do have to be backed by facts. That’s another reason why Greg Halpern is still the “flavor of the day.”

[jay14]

Amazing!!!! Six months, new leadership
and
the flavor of the day
is still the former CEO....lol

Bad, ex, censored transfer agent is correct;

no one cares
about yesteryears gibberish,

except non legitimate shareholders!!!!

[J Galt]

“Btw while reading through the post's you'll come to a post that references that Harvey Vechery indicated to same poster that he (HV) was investing in upgrading the company's technology along with the engineering.... I've asked that question about HV investing a few times but no response from that ex transfer agent.... Probably more hearsay to feel relevant....”

No response? I’ve actually responded to these illogical accusations in several posts. For instance, this was part of my IHUB post on 6/14/23.

Why is it so hard for Halpern to believe that someone taking over a defunct technology company would actually invest money into “engineering and technology?” Why wouldn’t they invest in their own product? Why is it so hard to believe that someone would invest money “in the company?” What do you do when you take over a non-revenue company that can’t support itself without cash injections, you have no choice but to invest cash, as there is no money in the company accounts.

Halpern has been repeating this mantra for weeks now as if there is something hidden behind the words. Some secret ethical lapse. Nice try. Vechery has been “investing” money into MAXD for many years, why would he stop now? Yet Halpern wants “proof” that the same man who invested millions of dollars in MAXD, might now want to invest a bit more? Especially now that the company syphon, who’s been draining all the money, is finally gone. Before a regurgitated "where’s the beef" tag line such as “where’s the proof” is thrown out, as if red meat for the troops, Halpern may want to put a bit more thought into it, and then look in the nearest mirror. “Proof” is something MAXD has been devoid of since day one.

I’ll let Harvey Vechery speak for himself about what he is going to be doing with his money in the future. I’m sure his overall game plan will be included in the company statement when they decide to release one.

[J Galt]

“It is now Harvey Vechery's responsibility to fix every aspect of MAXD!!!!” Whether Vechery’s responsibility or not, this is obviously an admission that the company is broken. Who broke MAXD in the first place? It wasn’t Harvey Vechery. It was Greg Halpern. The same man who took all of Harvey’s money and used none of it to improve the company, is now posting about how it is Vechery’s responsibility to fix what he destroyed.

By the way, the court dates you just posted, from my prior post about how the calendar works, are all accurate. What is confusing about them?

[J Galt]

Interesting take on words. Specious, but still interesting. Jokes aside, no one on Team Halpern understands Carl Jung, otherwise you would see the comparison was accurate. “If you cannot understand someone’s actions, look at the consequences and infer the motive.”

As to the “wounded animals be dangerous” comment, Halpern has been described by his supporters as being a “honey badger” in the past. He is more than wounded right now and is acting like it. I can only speak for myself, but I am far from being wounded. I’m relieved Halpern has finally been removed by the company and can no longer cause financial harm to the shareholders while soaking up all the money for himself. That is not being wounded, it is displaying relief.

[jay14]

If concerns mount around the subject at hand,
then ask this poster these questions of what seems to be confusing!!!!

J Galt
Monday, 06/05/2023 9:08:25 AM
The judgment was entered on January 11, 2023.
Relief order issued April 28, 2023.
Final order posted 5/18, 2023.




It is now Harvey Vechery's responsibility to fix every aspect of MAXD!!!!

[grantastic]

If you can't prove it, then it is not real.

Greg Halpern is still responsible for MAXD's failures.

Understandable that you're "not interested in it" since even the CEO of MAXD is also "not interested in" anything at all to do with this company either, now that there is no more money left for him to steal.

I could, by reading his past post's but
I'm not interested in it....
I've moved on....

[jay14]

I could, by reading his past post's but
I'm not interested in it....
I've moved on....

You know who it is,
And
have access to past post's....
Have at it,
read away!!!!

I'm interested in what is Harvey Vechery going to do with the company now that he's leader of the pack....
Varoom....lol

Isn't that what all transfer agent's,
shorts and mm's wanted....
New leadership????

Btw
while reading through the post's
you'll come to a post that references that Harvey Vechery indicated to same poster that he (HV) was investing in upgrading the company's technology along with the engineering....
I've asked that question about HV investing a few times but
no response from that ex transfer agent....

Probably more hearsay to feel relevant....

[grantastic]

can you prove it?

Harvey Vechery
is now leader of MAXD according to his post as of April 28....

[jay14]

IDK where the court order is, it's still pending....

That's a question for the poster I was replying to....

Harvey Vechery
is now leader of MAXD according to his post as of April 28....

[grantastic]

Why? Where is the court decision putting Vechery in charge of MAXD?

Always big claims + zero proof.

Harvey Vechery's decision!!!! Btw

[jay14]

[b]B e c a u s e y o u a r e n o t a n a c t a u a l s h a r e h o l d e r....

I spelled it out!!!!

Just another minion,
pushing Harvey Vechery's agenda,
with
yesteryear stories of no one cares....

Trying to be relevant....

[Utuse]

Caution - as much fun as it is to make sport of those who are not as Jung as we, wounded animals be dangerous. There is a high number of them around these boards now.

[jay14]

What is a “non-Legitimate shareholder?"

The poster I was replying to....lol

[J Galt]

What is a “non-Legitimate shareholder?" I’ve asked this question before without receiving an answer. “Sad, non legitimate shareholders are so upset that new leadership is talking with the former CEO....”

Is someone who made a deal with the company to accept shares in exchange for their services illegitimate? Isn’t that considered to be a form on monetary exchange? I believe the IRS looks at that way.

Is a note holder who exchanged money to the company in the form of a loan in exchange for shares, and then converted the note into shares upon default by Halpern, considered to be illegitimate?

Is someone who placed shares into a trust, or was gifted shares as part of a will or in some way, are they also illegitimate? Terms like that being thrown around as red meat should first be defined so readers know how to classify themselves.

As to being “upset” about the possibility that new leadership talking to the former CEO, why would I be? I’ve suggested Halpern needs to help in the transition and that requires communication of one type or another. Do I believe they were “having live discussions” on a foreign chat board? No. That’s not being upset, it’s being realistic.

[jay14]

Sad, non legitimate shareholders
are so upset
that new leadership is talking with the former CEO....