“Btw while reading through the post's you'll come to a post that references that Harvey Vechery indicated to same poster that he (HV) was investing in upgrading the company's technology along with the engineering.... I've asked that question about HV investing a few times but no response from that ex transfer agent.... Probably more hearsay to feel relevant....”
No response? I’ve actually responded to these illogical accusations in several posts. For instance, this was part of my IHUB post on 6/14/23.
Why is it so hard for Halpern to believe that someone taking over a defunct technology company would actually invest money into “engineering and technology?” Why wouldn’t they invest in their own product? Why is it so hard to believe that someone would invest money “in the company?” What do you do when you take over a non-revenue company that can’t support itself without cash injections, you have no choice but to invest cash, as there is no money in the company accounts.
Halpern has been repeating this mantra for weeks now as if there is something hidden behind the words. Some secret ethical lapse. Nice try. Vechery has been “investing” money into MAXD for many years, why would he stop now? Yet Halpern wants “proof” that the same man who invested millions of dollars in MAXD, might now want to invest a bit more? Especially now that the company syphon, who’s been draining all the money, is finally gone. Before a regurgitated "where’s the beef" tag line such as “where’s the proof” is thrown out, as if red meat for the troops, Halpern may want to put a bit more thought into it, and then look in the nearest mirror. “Proof” is something MAXD has been devoid of since day one.
I’ll let Harvey Vechery speak for himself about what he is going to be doing with his money in the future. I’m sure his overall game plan will be included in the company statement when they decide to release one.
