lev$elevator (LEV)

[thatguy157]

Just a theory, I don't fall into any of these categories. I want to see the stock go up so my sells go through. Also consider that there are people who make money on the stock going down. Who's looking out for their investment? Lol

The conversation is not about anyone "looking" out for their investment. It is about people being upset when they see a stock they are not involved and have stated no intentions of getting involved in when the stock turns green. Bravada for instance, who can be making money on the stock going down (if that were the case)?

[squeak1]

As far as real deal is concerned he is just about himself
F and always willing to lie and exaggerate about whatever he neads to do to satisfy his daily neads and agenda,
His comments are always put in the trash can where they belong.
I have absolutely no interest in the
Ike's of his bull shit at all.i believe in integrity and honesty,he has none of that

[squeak1]

The thing is CT I do respect what Danny says and I don't think he has ever intentionally lied or tried to mislead anybody,if and whenever I thought that I would be gone,no cry babying,no trying to get back and fostering any anger,it is my decision to be here and I like what I see.
I do realise that the pr was bashed initially and appreciate your clarifying it for others,I wouldn't follow you if I didn't respect your knowledge in this area,
What baffles and upsets me is the likes of YU finding bad in every single issue that comes out regarding Brav,I have no idea what his issues with Brav really are and he chooses never to divulge them but rather concentrates on relentlessly nitpicking minor or even made up facts regarding Brav,never ever answering questions,just redirecting them.
IF BRAV IS A SCAM THEN the only thing that would surprise me more is if Romney has never lied

[realdeal1051]

Just a theory, I don't fall into any of these categories. I want to see the stock go up so my sells go through. Also consider that there are people who make money on the stock going down. Who's looking out for their investment? Lol

[thatguy157]

These could be people who've been burned on past broken promises, returning like a scorned lover for revenge. They could be people that came with a genuine interest, but were attacked for asking questions and now want to see those people pay for their actions. These could be people that hate seeing others blindly rush into a situation based solely on the word of someone who stands to profit from it. Some people just like to watch the world burn.

So genuinely seeing a stock turn green would cause them pain because it goes against their personal gratification and non-financial interest of seeing people lose money? Interesting……….

[BeachBum]

Ouch!. Maybe I should go to lunch now. lol

[BeachBum]

The reason it was micro'ed was because the board automatically labeled the trademark defined posts as bashing. Quite the contrary actually. You will naturally get an argument by defense.

[Y U Axing Me]

Yes. Those two go together nicely.

Again, good luck to you.

[Y U Axing Me]

That's called blind faith, squeak. Good luck with your plan.

[squeak1]

I didn't want to be thanks tho
I never have to worry about petty stuff
I can see thru the bullshit every time
I understand what is going on here don't worry
When you guys are micro analyzing for hrs I have already decided about the subject matter and put it in the round file along with all t he rest of the nonsense you guys argue about

[BeachBum]

I think it was about the wording, not the entire content. The mark is not registered and has not been assigned. It is in 1B intent to use status post opposition period. The PR may have given some the impression that it is an assigned mark 1A. There is a difference but BRAV is still covered through the USPTO for overlap if someone tried to file a resembling application.

[Y U Axing Me]

Some people understood what was said by CT and I regarding the trademarks, and some didn't.

You were never expected to be included in the former group, squeak.

[squeak1]

So let's see,Danny gave out a good pr yesterday about trademarking for future franchises.
Turned out to be correct after being micro analyzed and discredited,and then we are supposed to be grateful for it!

[BeachBum]

I frequently post my entry and exit like I did a few days ago when I bought and sold BRAV at .0052 for even money. I also don't post when I have an active limit order set whether it's on the bid or the ask. If I disappear for a bit, chances are I'm buying, liquidating or have lost interest in the stock altogether. Just me.

[PhilipDrummond]

Then I will have my 15 minutes of fame

[realdeal1051]

I actually sent them last Thursday. Call me a concerned shareholder ;). It's a shame that you as a loyal long can't even speak to Danny, but look at the bright side, you'll probably get mentioned in the next PR!

[BeachBum]

That is no bs either. They had to file 1B because the site wasn't up and the stores were only in development ("Intent" to). I assume BRAV's attorney will be filing the 1A (In "use") application with supporting docs and pictures shortly. If approved, BRAV would hold a "registered" mark with number assigned.

Anyway, off to work.

Have a good day YU. I'll check in later.

[PhilipDrummond]

Ok. Send all my posts to Danny. Maybe he will actually call me.

[PhilipDrummond]

I am actually surprised myself

[Y U Axing Me]

Yup...You called it before you even looked at the USPTO site.

[PhilipDrummond]

I'll be the first to admit I have zero credibility

[BeachBum]

As you well know thorough our PM, I actually guessed how they filed before looking at the pr or board posts. I have to know my way around the USPTO to do that.

I have never claimed knowledge I don't possess.

[realdeal1051]

Chuck had credibility?!?

[realdeal1051]

Hmm, sounds like your words DID have some kind of affect on the stock and It's subsequent fall. And why wouldn't it, a loyal long saying he's selling could easily induce some shaky noobs to follow suit. It's a slippery slope my friend, too bad you decided to yell out in avalanche country. We'll see what Danny thinks.

[Y U Axing Me]

Yes you were mistaken. Still Stings? Damn dude. I'm sorry

Yes...CT. And he wasn't schooled on the service mark yesterday either.

chuck credibility = gone

[BeachBum]

And would never sell my shares.

Interesting. I thought you did a few weeks ago when I was buying those .0052's. Must of been a joke I didn't get.

[realdeal1051]

Funny, you throw more insults than anyone on this board AND the Brave board! I still have all of your nasty pms too, you big sweety pie!

[BeachBum]

Because in my opinion, you needed help. I saw the USPTO copy/paste job with no backing opinion or explanation. SInce I knew what all the words and numbers meant, I took some time and dated the process while explaining the status for you.

Sorry if I offended you in some way. GLTY

[realdeal1051]

That's the thing about libel, Chuck. It's not about what you do, It's about what you say. My buys are still in and haven't changed, looks like it was someone else's fiddle you were playing. We'll let Danny's lawyer decide.

[realdeal1051]

These could be people who've been burned on past broken promises, returning like a scorned lover for revenge. They could be people that came with a genuine interest, but were attacked for asking questions and now want to see those people pay for their actions. These could be people that hate seeing others blindly rush into a situation based solely on the word of someone who stands to profit from it. Some people just like to watch the world burn.

[Y U Axing Me]

Only if it fits, Chuck. You know that better than I.

Oh...and you're welcome.

[PhilipDrummond]

Call me a liar.

[PhilipDrummond]

But why were you clearing it up? When did it become a problem?

[Y U Axing Me]

Yes...You needed help. You obviously didn't know what was going on with the trademark. Both CT and I helped to clear it up. You might not like my way of doing so, but that's what I did. I cleared it up.

Tell me you didn't learn anything about trademarks yesterday, and I'll call you a liar.

[PhilipDrummond]

They are there. I did say I COULD take it down. Coincidentally, I had nothing to do with the pps tanking. And would never sell my shares. But boy I can play you like a fiddle...

[BeachBum]

I don't care how much he knows about trademarks.

That's a shame. I make money hiring people that know more than I in some areas.

I was trying to clear up the 1B status and why it was originally filed that way.

Sorry I offended you.

[PhilipDrummond]

You felt I needed help. So you throw insults? Nice man. How about you and your clan worked together to create a mess out of the PR yesterday.

[BeachBum]

I felt you may need some help so I posted an explanation as to why and when they did what they did. No good deed goes unpunished. Open your mind to other views Chuck.

[PhilipDrummond]

Clearing up why? When and Why did that become an issue?

[BeachBum]

And it wasn't an attack on BRAV as you know Missy. I was clearing up and dating the trademark filing which turned out to be good, not bad. I have only a few issues with BRAV and I am honest enough to post my opinion with or without shares. I also tell people when I buy and sell my shares.

[MissyL]

I did not read any of the deleted posts yesterday. Doing so now.

Missy

[PhilipDrummond]

Why am I never wrong? What was I wrong about? I will admit it.

[PhilipDrummond]

Oh really Missy? Take a good look at when and why I started posting. Then, you should look at his deleted posts he sent to me.

[Y U Axing Me]

right....you're never wrong.

Have a good day and good luck.

[PhilipDrummond]

Who cares about who knows more. I never claimed to be a trademark expert. But I was not wrong about anything I posted yesterday. I don't care how much he knows about trademarks.

[MissyL]

That is how I normally read all the posts, it seemed like you got upset with him very quickly over his response that (I think) you took as an attack on BRAV.

Nothing CT posted upset me yesterday.

Missy

[PhilipDrummond]

Missy, If you read the pr, and then began reading yesterdays posts beginning with YU"s post and follow the progression of events, you will understand.

[Y U Axing Me]

I'm sorry I don't understand the issue you have with CT about his explanation of Trademarks yesterday?

CT knows more about it. That's the only problem he has. I guess he doesn't like being schooled (and embarrassed).

[MissyL]

I'm sorry I don't understand the issue you have with CT about his explanation of Trademarks yesterday?

He has mentioned on more than one occasion that he deals with trademarks all the time. He also gave some good information on the BRAV board yesterday IMO.

Missy

[Y U Axing Me]

And obviously, you have no idea who I am