Replies to post #83322 on NanoViricides Inc. (NNVC)

[leifsmith]

A reasonable response. I see that you disagree with people who have, on this board, responded to the SA article, and in some detail.

I actually have no problem with the founders controlling the company at this point in its development. If I didn't think they were doing a good job or if I didn't trust them it's easier to exit through the always available door than it is to complain about it. There are always alternative investments.

Concerning the licensing agreements. They make sense to me and do not give me concern. But maybe you could sketch out a scenario that would justify concern?

[noretreat]

The only thing that is wrong is the pace of progress toward trials. None of that B.S. from the shorters matters if there is clear progress toward trials. I was hopeful that all this crap would act like a spur to speed this horse up. Early indicators are that this will not happen, and the only pr we've had lately offered up more reasons for delay...weather and slow equipment delivery.

The only thing that matters here is getting into the clinic. I'm thinking the earliest possible date for this is now late 2015.