All I can say to you is contact a lawyer who has engaged in litigation and ask about the advantages of a high/low binding arbitration entered into with a company much larger than you who has just won a flimsy decision at a government administrative hearing. IDCC would not have entered into this agreement if they can get skinned. Huawei has been trying to set a rate all along rather than play the patent attack game. Most companies understand that each dent that hits a competitor in this game will eventually swing back around to put a dent in them. They participated in the standards process. Most are not like Nok who take advantage of being in your lab and library for 3 years planning a scorched earth patent attack and inventing the definition of low life dealing. They probably know that the 151 patent has a good chance of standing up and that there is not a company more deserving a ban than Nok. This last 337 could become a cluster f##k and they would prefer not to take their turn in the barrel.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
