InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 164
Posts 6362
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/02/2003

Re: the trading doctor post# 379795

Tuesday, 12/24/2013 12:27:02 PM

Tuesday, December 24, 2013 12:27:02 PM

Post# of 432677
All I can say to you is contact a lawyer who has engaged in litigation and ask about the advantages of a high/low binding arbitration entered into with a company much larger than you who has just won a flimsy decision at a government administrative hearing. IDCC would not have entered into this agreement if they can get skinned. Huawei has been trying to set a rate all along rather than play the patent attack game. Most companies understand that each dent that hits a competitor in this game will eventually swing back around to put a dent in them. They participated in the standards process. Most are not like Nok who take advantage of being in your lab and library for 3 years planning a scorched earth patent attack and inventing the definition of low life dealing. They probably know that the 151 patent has a good chance of standing up and that there is not a company more deserving a ban than Nok. This last 337 could become a cluster f##k and they would prefer not to take their turn in the barrel.

MO
loop
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent IDCC News