I appreciate your response. Even if the corporate structure would not allow us the opportunity to have direct credit toward profit of their per-established sales and pipeline it would still be booked as income through WSGI, correct? Either way, curiosity still lingers to know LTAS' rough revenue. Also,the potential revenues it takes to afford 6 employees of this kind.
My reading of this acquisition thus far, tends to account this as a strategic one indeed. I don't know much about LTAS and the work of Kevin other than what I have read since yesterday, but my concerns lie in the additional costs. Without having a steady revenue stream from LTAS it becomes an additional liability to offset until sales/production kicks in. A cash balance less than $50k will not support much salary if the employees don't agree to stock compensation. Some revenues need derived immediately from this acquisition, imo.
Long term I think it is a very strategically wise purchase. Any time you can buy a competitor or integrate a supplier profitability risk is reduced. Luckily for us, it happens to be both in a very thin market, respectively.
I do recall your early posts about building from the ground up and initially thought you were crazy, but quickly had conviction. I too am excite about the mast surveillance business and will greatly enhance my enthusiasm once I see revenue!
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
