InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

sctts

09/28/12 2:40 PM

#65114 RE: RIPPER #65111

The SEC would have put accuracy if there were any accuracy issues.. the other 15 had them.. The SEC investigation clearly says nothing about accuracy. not one thing. Per the SEC minor issue that can be handled with filings. Adequacy only.... nuff said



That has been covered and coverd again

Everyone knows it is for adequecy only
icon url

GREGG THE GREEK

09/28/12 5:28 PM

#65248 RE: RIPPER #65111

EYE opening find Rip

man, you're really doing a great job of showing folks what is actually spelled out in the complaint

good to know

'adequacy' ONLY
icon url

janice shell

09/28/12 5:50 PM

#65261 RE: RIPPER #65111

From Fallacaro:

This is what I was told in answer to my questions. First, there was no Wells notice issued or sent to either me personally, the company or my attorneys. That would have meant they wanted to receive information from the company unrelated to the financials.

That makes absolutely no sense. The purpose of a Wells notice is to inform the recipient that the SEC's investigation of him or his company is substantially complete, and that the agency intends to bring a lawsuit.

I'm afraid his complete lack of understanding of Wells notices casts some doubt on the credibility of the rest of what he said.