InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 189
Posts 32539
Boards Moderated 3
Alias Born 07/14/2011

Re: None

Friday, 09/28/2012 2:38:51 PM

Friday, September 28, 2012 2:38:51 PM

Post# of 97615
The SEC would have put accuracy if there were any accuracy issues.. the other 15 had them.. The SEC investigation clearly says nothing about accuracy. not one thing. Per the SEC minor issue that can be handled with filings. Adequacy only.... nuff said


oh and there is this public record...

A Letter to the shareholders

I have taken the time over the last two days to confirm with both the SEC in Washington and the SEC Enforcement Division Miami the reason for the suspension, which I believed was the case. This is what I was told in answer to my questions. First, there was no Wells notice issued or sent to either me personally, the company or my attorneys. That would have meant they wanted to receive information from the company unrelated to the financials. Second, it was verified by them that the statement for the suspension for ten days was for the financial information needed only to comply with the reporting company regulations stemming from errors made in 2007 and to the present 10Q. When I asked them if they needed any other support documents or exhibits from the company or anything at all they said all that is needed is the financial information to be filed on EDGAR.