Walrath was constrained by Bankruptcy Rules
She must accept the Debtor's pleadings and the Debtors choices of who to make deals with at face value. The Debtor remains in control until he loses control.
No reading between the lines by the Judge to find what maybe or might be different than the Debtors representations to the Court. That would be the job of a Party in Interest,such as the US Trustee or such as Equity.
But wait, Equity was to be cancelled and only became possible with Walrath's ruling on the merits allowing Equity to have a voice that is PAID for by the Estate. Win, Lose or Draw, Susman will be paid and we, as Equity stockholders, are not receiving legal invoices every month, the Estate is. If we win, then we got representation, very excellent representation, essentially for free. There will be way more money available for us than Susman cost the Estate. If we lose, we only lose our stock, there will be no legal bill to pay in addition to the loss. If you cannot afford to lose it all, then you have over invested in this stock and need more diversity. (p.s. we will win big)
The good Judge must play by the Bankruptcy rules or she will quickly be removed and someone else will then control our destiny. These rules are codified in law and defined by Appellate Court decisions. Our existence is proof to me that Judge Mary is doing her best, within the rules, to help us.
If you don't understand these rules, then use your brain and learn something new.