InvestorsHub Logo

Nightdaytrader

06/21/11 8:04 PM

#311892 RE: XOM #311889

Great job XOM... and thanks...

ND9

Civil War General

06/21/11 8:32 PM

#311894 RE: XOM #311889

So-cram-down the greedy-Aurelius like they wanted to-do-to Equity.

Make them vote to either accept the Plan or freeze their shares and force them to litigate after confirmation because they didn't want to be included in the Plan, just like they wanted to do to us.

Bizreader

06/21/11 8:40 PM

#311895 RE: XOM #311889

This billing is big news. Where else do investors with Washington Mutual, Inc. WAMUQ, WAMPQ, WAMKQ, get direct knowledge of work being done in favor of price per share?

scanc2211

06/21/11 9:28 PM

#311902 RE: XOM #311889

Common Interest Agreement:

When a party claiming the attorney-client privilege voluntarily discloses confidential information to a third party, the disclosing party generally waives any attorney-client privilege that may attach to the information.3 The common interest rule, however, provides that the attorney-client privilege is not waived when communications are made to a third party who is not a co-party or his counsel when they are “part of an on-going and joint effort to set up a common defense strategy.” 4 This common interest rule applies when “all [of the] parties who share the privilege” have not consented to a waiver of the privilege.5 Courts have extended the common interest rule to various co-parties, including civil co-defendants, potential co-parties to prospective litigation, and civil parties in separate actions.6 No matter the type of action or actions involved, “the rationale for the [common interest privilege] remains unchanged: persons who share a common interest in litigation should be able to communicate with their respective attorneys and with each other to more effectively prosecute or defend their claims.”7

Makes you go HMMMMMMM!

http://www.mobar.org/3ea49385-c05d-4f27-8670-6265835eeb1e.aspx (edited to insert link)

xoom

06/21/11 10:11 PM

#311914 RE: XOM #311889

Thanks XOM. Any hint on what exactly the following item means ?

31 MAY SARGENT Attending meeting at Weil Gotshal re. claims against directors and officers and structure of reorganized debtor.

uzualsuzpect

06/21/11 10:17 PM

#311916 RE: XOM #311889

Sweet breakdown XOM! Thanks man!

Bizreader

06/21/11 10:22 PM

#311919 RE: XOM #311889

If I was a lawyer younger than 70 I wouldn't want to have to face Susman.