Replies to post #16684 on Mobilepro Corp (fka MOBL)

[harr449]

If someone reads History of court documents in my post,

I can access further details of individual documents if "very important". Access is not free so I try to limit page views.

[mecah]

It appears some attorneys are leaving and some attorneys are coming in. Changing the guard for some reason. I wonder what is going on. Some motions are "Pro hac vice" meaning lawyers are coming to this case who do not have jurisdiction to practice and must seek the approval of the court. I wonder if they are specialists or big guns or just a change of course for some reason.
I guess there have not been any further efforts on delays...Yet..LOL..Thanks for your efforts.

[harr449]

Albert H. Kramer

1:99-cv-00696-ESH APCC SERVICES INC, et al v. AT&T CORPORATION

District of Columbia

Ellen S. Huvelle, presiding
Date filed: 03/19/1999

2011 HISTORY

Doc.
No. Dates Description

148
Filed & Entered: 04/22/2011
Notice of Appearance
Docket Text: NOTICE of Appearance by Albert H. Kramer on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Kramer, Albert)
*****************
Albert H. Kramer

Albert Kramer joined Dickstein Shapiro as a partner in 1995 and is head of the firm’s Communications Practice.

Bar Admissions
District of Columbia
California

http://www.dicksteinshapiro.com/kramera/
******************************************
harr449 Tuesday, May 03, 2011 7:23:47 AM
Re: harr449 post# 16750 Post #16752 of 16816

In APCC vs. Qwest, didn't see mention of either law firm recently posted in my messages (Levetown/Jenkins or HBSS).

Dickstein Shapiro, Washington, DC is shown to represent APCC on an April 27, 2011 document for order of dismissal of case, settled out of court.

Saw mention of a Special Master involved in late 2010. Special Master ordered meetings in Jan. 2011 which don't appear to have been held.

Will try to post actual court document hisory, etc. later.