InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

kownski

12/13/09 11:20 AM

#190391 RE: spp119 #190390

Spp,

In your view, do we have something very similar to AKPO in the JDZ?
TIA

John
icon url

walldog0

12/13/09 11:27 AM

#190393 RE: spp119 #190390

spp119...I think most folks here believe, that Bumo....

was mostly gas....however most believe that Kina is mostly oil. You seem to believe that Bumo was drilled and thus Addax immediately ordered 6 FLNG floaters....most here don't buy that, me included.

Most here believe the NASI(?) numbers...and you seem to be convinced they are wrong.

Kina is tight holed right now....so why do you think your source know anything about Kina?....when NOBODY KNOW NOTHING!

The shareprice doesn't seem to know anything either!...it is behaving like ....NOBODY KNOWS NOTHING!

Face the logical conclusion, and your source KNOWS NOTHING...especially about KINA.
icon url

Art2004

12/13/09 11:46 AM

#190399 RE: spp119 #190390

Good post Spp. Good point about what Homeport posted yesterday about STP officials quote of results to the present.

Though their quote may not be as up to date as your source and Pup.

As we all realize, the message board allows for and even encourages personal opinions.. so there will be diversity.

I do appreciate your posts and look forward to commercial discoveries in our JDZ drilling which could be condensate, gas and even oil, too. lol

Good regards,

Art
icon url

ssc

12/13/09 12:58 PM

#190409 RE: spp119 #190390

spp, maybe you misunderstood part of my post. The conundrum I was referring to is your sources saying gas, gas, gas and mark's sources saying oil, oil, oil. I was not questioning the revision in amount of gas you referred to.

Also, I wasn't asking you to disclose any estimates. I was just looking for a way to equate Tcf gas to Mbl oil. In other words, how many Tcf of gas would equate to the NSAI estimates of oil, or how much gas equals, say, 100 million barrels of oil?
icon url

Homeport

12/13/09 2:21 PM

#190414 RE: spp119 #190390

On your last question, Spp119: I think the lack of discussion here on my JDZ post yesterday is clearly/simply due to fact we prefer to discuss the pleasant, the reassuring. We prefer the prospect of oil to gas and of fast-tracking to production in 2014 at earliest.

For my part, I thank you - once more - for keeping us aware of the other possibilities (probabilities?) and of the fact they not necessarily disastrous, even though possibly disappointing.

Bests,
HP
icon url

Hawk700

12/13/09 7:14 PM

#190439 RE: spp119 #190390



Hi Spp.....

You posted.....

""In the four+ years I have been in ERHE, he has always given out information that was either partly wrong or partially complete. The man does not lie.""


Concerning the information your source gave out, did you post the information on the board? What information was it exactly? Just want to judge for myself the accuracy of the information.
icon url

midtieroil

12/14/09 1:01 AM

#190473 RE: spp119 #190390

Actually I do not find your sources credible at all. You were the one that said there was a blowout. Never happened. You are the one that keeps saying that deepwater gas-only production is viable when not a single such project exists in all of W. Africa. You were the one that said there was little or no oil. That too will prove to be wrong. I don't know who your "sources" are but I wouldn't rely on them. They have not been very accurate to date and I don't expect them to be accurate in the future.