An omnibus response post
1)- I consider my source(s) infinitely more dependable than that affable gentleman from the JDA. In the four+ years I have been in ERHE, he has always given out information that was either partly wrong or partially complete. The man does not lie. He just does not like to say things which may be unpleasant to the listener.
2) - No conundrum Scc. The figures first given out were indeed immense. They were challenged internally, as is natural, with the various post-discovery recalibrations and data and have been revised downwards, but I understand not by much.
And to throw back a curve ball hurled at me some time ago, no I am not the only one in the world privy to these numbers....quite a number of people have access to them as well, but there are stringent non-disclosures about. So, you see I will not be tempted to offer estimates based on what I know. Until I post my souce documentation - as I have promised to do when appropriate -. Then you can make your own assessment.
3)- Listen caveman, stop being so bitter all the time. You usually make good points, but you are one very difficult person to deal with. I was as flabbergasted as anyone when I heard about the Bomu gas fiasco. I genuinely expected - based on a conservative (little league)reading of the NSAI figures Addax had dished out - ~240mmbls oil. Yet, no oil there, just gas and barely in commercially exploitable amounts unless tied in with other (drillable)prospects.
I said so and so explicitly wrote in a post at the time. So nothing is forgotten on my part. I got a shock and said so. Which was very much overcome however when I subsequently learned of the gas find estimates from Lemba and Kina. Perhaps because I never bought the pigs-can-fly mega oil expectations of some of the more imaginative people on this board.... And because I had not written off mostly gas finds post-drilling, from my register of vision.
Perhaps however, you should search into your own past negativity (on everything) and see that you kept challenging me on the gas issue. Which I have raised since way back when. Or are you so full of yourself to even bother remembering.
4) Ajaxx, we are talking about LNG Floaters, because that is what Addax has specified in the call for the JDZ wells it listed. See the relavent post (# number is not handy right now).
5) So when is an appropriate time for me to post anything Pepsiman? Or would you really rather just prefer I restrict myself to posting inane,one liner nonsense like you. Or just shut up and stop interfering with the games being played.....?
Go...have a Coke.
6) Now a question to all.... the good, the bad and the ugly.
Why is there so little discussion on Homeport's post yesterday, where the head of the JDA spoke of exploratory drilling finding "indications of hydrocarbons, concretely gas," .
In any other circumstance, this would have been analyzed to the extreme.
spp119
