Replies to post #265381 on Spongetech Delivery Systems, Inc. (fka SPNGQ)

[@-@]

Might not be a good cause of action, but certainly a good pump.

[Xenophon]

I completely agree with you. I see that claim as nothing but harassment. The claims about Spongables selling under a Spongetech name or something like that is a different animal however.

I see the claim against Popovsky's statement to a reporter as nothing but PR-via-lawsuit by SPNG - the other claims based on trademark misuse may or may not have merit.

[igotthemojo]

popovsky is the ceo of a company that is in the same business as spng...which makes him a expert in that particular sector..which is why his statement in the matter was sought..so the quote by him is more than an "opinion"..he also is a competitor of spongetech...which means he has a potential to profit with a loss of spongetech credibility...with the statement he made, he basically called spongetech management flat out liars..publicly..in print..a direct quote.......yea, i think that is actionable...it isnt even close...once again..common sense..

as for getting a reporter to testify to that statement...a subpoena should be all thats necessary...she isnt protecting a confidential source..she questioned popovsky, took his quote and published it along with his name..whats to protect or hide?...

common sense...