"The claims about Spongables selling under a Spongetech name or something like that is a different animal however"
No doubt a much stickier wicket. Even if supported by the facts I can't imagine how they'd measure the damages. But if Popovsky's market estimate is a reasonable indicator of Spongeables sales, and the damage to SPNG is valued as a portion of those Spongeable sales that "should" have been SPNG's, it ain't much.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
