Replies to post #170172 on Enzyme Environmental Solutions Inc (EESO)

[wEaReLeGiOn]

I replied to your other message, it was deleted.


(check the responses)


I guess you're talking about penny stocks such as EESO with sharp rises? Listed companies don't have too many sharp rises, but the street reacts to favorable developments, because the street is always correct.

The street is correct with penny stock crap too. The sharp rises you mention are also sharp falls, back to 'street' level, because the street is always correct :)

I'm not interested in a private chat, sorry..



wEaReLeGiOn, we're not trying to "carve out a vacuum of exception" for EESO. We're just pointing out that your assertion (as fact, mind you) that the "street" is always correct, is actually flatly incorrect.
If you prefer, feel free to PM me your contact at the SEC so I can follow up on your assertions.

[imiloa]

wEaReLeGiOn, still waiting on:

-- Contact info or evidence backing your assertion that the SEC has been looking into EESO irregularities. I'm happy to do the follow-up research to confirm your claim. Just need the contact info. Feel free to PM it if you prefer not to post publicly.

-- Your response to my "deal or no deal" wager.
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=41333998

-- re: "The street is always correct" -- Your explanation of what you mean by the "street" and how its "always correct" information can be used intelligently. Specifically, how we know the "street" is correct about the current price level, when it was obviously wrong about 0.02 support in the spring.

-- Your evidence/source for the assertion as "fact" that "EESO is full of hot air and virtually worthless, 'dems are just the facts though..."
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=41349322


As always, I'm fully open to the possibility that EESO could be a scam, and believe everyone here should trade as such. But I also feel that both positive and negative claims about the company need to be grounded in some manner of evidence.

Looking fwd to your answers.