InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

msturgeo

07/30/07 6:47 PM

#83330 RE: jfburk #83327

Not that I support Vern in any way - disclaimer - I don't support what you are saying either. There are a handful of you that are still here - hiding behind anonymous handles - working this board. All you have to do is read Seth Jason's articles and conclude that this company was a complete waste of time. Many here are still support this company on pink sheets - trying to reclaim what little monies they still have left by reporting on how great the "new" GTEM is -- well show me one bit -- of profit -- one bit of the 3 year plan that came true - show me one ounce of reality that this company is anything other than a SHAM?

Buyer Beware. There still are diehards pumping up the dream --

WHEN DO I GET MY MONEY BACK?
icon url

vkoenig

07/30/07 7:14 PM

#83339 RE: jfburk #83327

jfburk: Where do you come up with me not supporting Huff? Huff truly amazed me with his skills as a CEO. He is a born leader. He might still be a little wet behind the ears, but he has the potential to run a major corporation. When GTEM axed Huff, I think it was one of the biggest mistakes they ever made.

Huff is not the kind of guy who settles for 2nd place. Second place in a boxing match is the loser. I personally believe what has happened to Huff in the recent past will amount to his baptism of fire. I guarantee you that if he were to come back to GTEM and take the reigns that things would be a lot different this time.

I say that you shareholders should demand a shareholder meeting and put him back in control of GTEM. What you will be doing is placing a humbled tiger back into the drivers' seat. Huff isn't the kind of guy who makes the same mistake twice. I cannot recall any unpaid bills, evictions, unpaid employees, and a plethora of lawsuits when Huff was in command. He made a mistake or two, but no one can ever say that he was not in absolute 100% positive control of that company.

I wouldn't take 100 Khoury's and 100 Kostro's for 1 Tim Huff.
icon url

runandadd

07/31/07 8:33 AM

#83388 RE: jfburk #83327

I find it absoltely shocking that you appear to be letting Tim Huff off the hook. I don't think he just relied on his department heads for knowledge. In a company that had such a small number of employees I think he was very much aware of how far from ready the Strat. was. I believe in this area where he was very much over-promotional.

I cannot guess why he put out all those PRs but I'm sure he had first hand knowledge.