InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

jfburk

07/30/07 7:30 PM

#83340 RE: vkoenig #83339

Vern, suggest you read my post and refute it if you can. The fact is Tim Huff was responsible for the results reported by all the former division heads that never delivered a dime to the company. The buck stops at the CEO and since he is responsible for the lack of results from his own people he took the fall. New management got rid of those that really let him down. I like that about new management which holds people accountable for performance.

Now it is those same people that you seem to give credibility to. You cannot support Tim Huff and then those that threw him under the bus. Could it be that your potential personal gain outweighs loyalty to Tim Huff?
icon url

cpmac

07/30/07 9:55 PM

#83357 RE: vkoenig #83339

Vern and his guarantees "I guarantee you that if he were to come back to GTEM and take the reigns that things would be a lot different this time."
icon url

redwing1

07/31/07 12:12 AM

#83369 RE: vkoenig #83339

Vern,

I respect all you have done and enjoy most of your posts, I can tell you are a loyal friend to Huff but the last thing my imvestment needs is huff at the controls again. We tried his way, he had his shot and failed miserably. Huff had lawsuits on his watch, drove the shareprice back down to nothing and continued to make basic stupid mangement decisions that killed all of us that were loyal investors. I mean they weren't just bad decisions they were monumental not even close...invite shareholders and media in to see a half baked Strat, a conference call for the company billing itself as revolutionizing internet distribution and they can't find a way to broadcast their own shareholder meeting live etc... Say anything you want on this board but please don't tell me what I really need is Huff back in control, thats the last thing we need.