frog,
Marlarkey, if you thing grants are'nt effected by political influence, you're naiive. Besides, although I didn't make it clear, I was talking about private companies, not academic grants.
If you represent a company, you were wise to have a Pa university involved.
My knowledge of DNAP's science no longer comes just from what they say. Thanks to Mingwan0's contributions, plus my own increasingly effective research, I can reach my own conclusions.
Further, if you think Ancestry, all by itself, isn't an indication that DNAP is ahead of everyone else, why isn't anyone else marketing it? Mark Shriver went with DNAP because he recognized they were ahead of everyone else.
You're need for some reason to see DNAP sucking a hind tit continues to make your posts irrelevant as far as I'm concerned.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
