DNAprint Genomics (DNAG)

[frogdreaming]

bag8ger,

Nonsense. I am currently working with a research effort at a prominent University in Pennsylvania on an NIH grant. Politics had nothing to do with the grant award. It was evaluated solely on the merits of the science involved. No one in our group had any contact or any influence with the administration, the cabinet or the legislature.

To suggest that all NIH grants are awarded under such underhanded conditions is an insult to researchers everywhere. It is beneath you.

You have no idea what evaluation criteria have played against DNAP in these matters. Your admitted ignorance of the state of the art of DNAP's science disqualifies you from an objective evaluation. You are basing your beliefs solely on the claims of DNAP that they are ahead of everyone else. There has never been 'any' outside verification of those claims. You would do well to try to be a little more objective. Emotion and belief will not cut much ice with any of the evaluation comitees.

regards,
frog