Sunday, January 11, 2004 4:26:14 PM
Marlarkey, if you thing grants are'nt effected by political influence, you're naiive. Besides, although I didn't make it clear, I was talking about private companies, not academic grants.
If you represent a company, you were wise to have a Pa university involved.
My knowledge of DNAP's science no longer comes just from what they say. Thanks to Mingwan0's contributions, plus my own increasingly effective research, I can reach my own conclusions.
Further, if you think Ancestry, all by itself, isn't an indication that DNAP is ahead of everyone else, why isn't anyone else marketing it? Mark Shriver went with DNAP because he recognized they were ahead of everyone else.
You're need for some reason to see DNAP sucking a hind tit continues to make your posts irrelevant as far as I'm concerned.
Glidelogic Corp. Becomes TikTok Shop Partner, Opening a New Chapter in E-commerce Services • GDLG • Jul 5, 2024 7:09 AM
Freedom Holdings Corporate Update; Announces Management Has Signed Letter of Intent • FHLD • Jul 3, 2024 9:00 AM
EWRC's 21 Moves Gaming Studios Moves to SONY Pictures Studios and Green Lights Development of a Third Upcoming Game • EWRC • Jul 2, 2024 8:00 AM
BNCM and DELEX Healthcare Group Announce Strategic Merger to Drive Expansion and Growth • BNCM • Jul 2, 2024 7:19 AM
NUBURU Announces Upcoming TV Interview Featuring CEO Brian Knaley on Fox Business, Bloomberg TV, and Newsmax TV as Sponsored Programming • BURU • Jul 1, 2024 1:57 PM
Mass Megawatts Announces $220,500 Debt Cancellation Agreement to Improve Financing and Sales of a New Product to be Announced on July 11 • MMMW • Jun 28, 2024 7:30 AM