![](http://investorshub.advfn.com/images/default_ih_profile2_4848.jpg?cb=0)
Sunday, January 11, 2004 4:26:14 PM
Marlarkey, if you thing grants are'nt effected by political influence, you're naiive. Besides, although I didn't make it clear, I was talking about private companies, not academic grants.
If you represent a company, you were wise to have a Pa university involved.
My knowledge of DNAP's science no longer comes just from what they say. Thanks to Mingwan0's contributions, plus my own increasingly effective research, I can reach my own conclusions.
Further, if you think Ancestry, all by itself, isn't an indication that DNAP is ahead of everyone else, why isn't anyone else marketing it? Mark Shriver went with DNAP because he recognized they were ahead of everyone else.
You're need for some reason to see DNAP sucking a hind tit continues to make your posts irrelevant as far as I'm concerned.
Glidelogic Corp. Announces Revolutionary AI-Generated Content Copyright Protection Solution • GDLG • Jul 26, 2024 12:30 PM
Southern Silver Files NI43-101 Technical Report for its Updated Preliminary Economic Assessment for the Cerro Las Minitas Project • SSV • Jul 25, 2024 8:00 AM
Greenlite Ventures Completes Agreement with No Limit Technology • GRNL • Jul 19, 2024 10:00 AM
VAYK Expects Revenue from First Airbnb Property Starting from August • VAYK • Jul 18, 2024 9:00 AM
North Bay Resources Acquires Mt. Vernon Gold Mine, Sierra County, California, with Assays up to 4.8 oz. Au per Ton • NBRI • Jul 18, 2024 9:00 AM
Nightfood Holdings Signs Letter of Intent for All-Stock Acquisition of CarryOutSupplies.com • NGTF • Jul 17, 2024 1:00 PM