Replies to post #11197 on DNAprint Genomics (DNAG)

[frogdreaming]

Bag8ger,

Malarky is a good term. If you think mingwan0's contributions are objective and unbiased your equally naive.

As to your reference to Ancestry being an example of DNAP's lead in science, I think you should rethink that. As you imply Shriver developed Ancestry, and in a supported academic research environment I might add. It is in no way a measure of DNAP's lead in science. Just their willingness to associate themselves with him.

Your statement assumes that Shriver had a choice of suitors eager to partner with him and he chose DNAP based on their leadership. Do you any reference for this assumption. Who did he turn down because they were not as far along?

I have no need to see DNAP sucking hind tit, as you so colorfully state. I also have no interest in pretending that wishful thinking and unfounded belief has any value when evaluating the economic potential of a company's capabilities.

regards,
frog