InvestorsHub Logo

Deadheded

03/15/07 11:02 AM

#68076 RE: JimProfit #68072

Jim thank you for the link. pages 2 and 3 have some stuff also..

nerd86

03/15/07 11:11 AM

#68079 RE: JimProfit #68072

There you have it JimProfit an Invoice in dispute. There is a process call out in Sands invoice for the resolution of a dispute. Regardless of the reasons, he agreed to peroformance which he deliberately withheld, yet he billed for the entire agreed to amount. When he didn't get it he attempted to extort his money by threats. I'm sorry JimProfit Sands does not look like snow white to me. There is a process to capture his money, and despite all his rhetoric he knows full well what that process is.

If this is the first time he has been stiffed for payment he is very junior in his business. There is a line item on every income statement call bad debt. Sorry JimProfit I thought you might have something.

siriuslyricher

03/15/07 11:27 AM

#68083 RE: JimProfit #68072

Hey Jim, we have no idea if these are real or manufactured emails - you conveniently leave out the name and email address of the alleged sender. Also, the wire harness was replaced/repaired and the strat has flown since then, with its engines and propulsion system working flawlessly. You have no idea of the sequence of events, but the latest test was successful and the problem fixed, so stop living in the past.

BTW, the company has pr'd that the wire harness failed and that it was fixed. I'm not sure that a wire harness burning out is a material event either; the airship failing, yes, but not the replacement of a part. And I'm not trying to play games here. Do we get news releases from Boeing, Lockheed, Northrup, etc. each and every time part of a test fails or a particular part burns out? I think not. GTEM was able to do the float test and test several systems in December, and then when the new wire harness was received, test the engines as well as the propulsion systems. And, if you think GTEM had not previously successfully tested the engines many times in the hangar prior to the December test, then you are sadly mistaken. You cannot see the forest for the trees.

You and the alleged sender of these emails seem oblivious as to the nature of developing and building a new type of aircraft from scratch. As Nerd says, testing is to discover and fix the problems. I'd like to see you and the alleged sender of these emails design, develop, and build a stratellite that has industry giants like Raytheon interested.

followinsnsr

03/15/07 1:37 PM

#68113 RE: JimProfit #68072

Seems to be about the time Business Wire was replaced by Primenewswire.
"Again, in light of Mr. Murch\'s remarks. This is why we resigned from your company as your outside media."