While I haven't seen anything the company has done that I believe was fraudulent (failure is not a crime , failure is just failure), if the company did do something illegal I believe your assessment from action taken and if successful is spot on.
Seems like a no win situation if the company is unable to deliver.
- "the only financial winners will be the lawyers"
- "the shareholders who get the opportunity to watch the CEO stand before a judge. (doesn't recoup any of their loses)"
- "the best shareholders will get will be tax write off under a fraud claim. Spoiler, its a full write off as opposed to a partial spread out over several years" Guess you could consider this a minor victory, but if the plaintiff knew this was a scam for years (as they claim) wouldn't they have been further ahead if they sold long before the RS.
- "you're in for a LONG rid.
Lose everything if the company fails completely, lose even more if you wasting money on attorneys trying to get blood from a stone.
I think good luck would be that the company actually delivers before enacting massive dilution, rather then a lawsuit.
But that is just me.