On the ENZC website they only list two patents - and the miracle and mysterious Clone 3 patent doesn't exist.
They list several patents are pending but they don't provide a application number.
When you were pumping that Cotropia filed a lawsuit against Fauci for stealing the Clone 3 patent - which not close to being true - you didn't do any research to verify it - what a despicable act on your part.
CC did have the clone 3 patent but he had to get a new patent for the recumbent clone three that Samsung made. That patent may be legally tied to ENZC but im not sure.
Several points to be made here about Charles’ IPs. The merging into ENZC brought Charles’ IPs to ENZC attracted more shareholders monies to ENZC. If Charles used shareholders monies to develop other IPs or products or fine-tune his own IP , then the all the IPs now become parts of ENZC.
Charles would not have been able to fine-tune his own IPs without the use of ENZC shareholders monies . Whatever else Charles and ENZC team and consultants came up with during his time and prior at ENZC belong to ENZC and ENZC shareholders
These IPs do not have to be a patent just yet. They could be IP applications or even an idea that was came up during their time of employment at ENZC.
There are lots of ties between IPs and a company and use of shareholders monies
P/S are the bashers related to ENZC ( Charles and Chandra)? Why are they defending Charles and Chandra’s IPs? Or perhaps they are simply not understanding IP regulations?
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
