InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 49
Posts 3611
Boards Moderated 2
Alias Born 02/01/2019

Re: BonnieMac post# 197413

Thursday, 04/25/2024 11:37:01 AM

Thursday, April 25, 2024 11:37:01 AM

Post# of 198994
Several points to be made here about Charles’ IPs.
The merging into ENZC brought Charles’ IPs to ENZC attracted more shareholders monies to ENZC. If Charles used shareholders monies to develop other IPs or products or fine-tune his own IP , then the all the IPs now become parts of ENZC.

Charles would not have been able to fine-tune his own IPs without the use of ENZC shareholders monies . Whatever else Charles and ENZC team and consultants came up with during his time and prior at ENZC belong to ENZC and ENZC shareholders

These IPs do not have to be a patent just yet. They could be IP applications or even an idea that was came up during their time of employment at ENZC.

There are lots of ties between IPs and a company and use of shareholders monies

P/S are the bashers related to ENZC ( Charles and Chandra)? Why are they defending Charles and Chandra’s IPs? Or perhaps they are simply not understanding IP regulations?