InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Tleprathy

05/25/22 8:51 AM

#101208 RE: maheu86 #101201

Key differences from the photostability PR earlier in the year:

- They're now explicitly stating that the photostability achieved is not merely 'breakthrough' or 'new' or a 'world record', but that it has met the standards demanded by tier 1s for commercialisation. This is a huge milestone.

- Perhaps more interestingly, they say the photostability results don't just confirm the reliability of the material, but also compatibility with standard foundry processes. That suggests to me that the results weren't derived from tests in a lab, with Perkinamine in isolation, but rather that they've come off the back of a pilot run on a production line.

Woop. Huge.
icon url

oddone33320

05/25/22 8:52 AM

#101211 RE: maheu86 #101201

I believe the difference was that the previous PR focused specifically on the Polymer, not verified operability/reliability within a modulator in a commercial setting.

This PR focuses on verified testing results over time (3000+ hours) of the polymer inside an operating modulator - demonstrating that what was presented in the 2/10 PR translates from theory/lab settings to actual practice in a commercial setting as anticipated with regard to photostability/reliability.