Replies to post #354836 on Amarin Corp Plc (AMRN)

[Ishouldknowbetter]

Kiwi,

All are valid arguments.

Not sure a doctor on an airplane could be sued for not helping a stricken traveler as they have been sued for trying. Amarin must fulfill their contractual obligations and I would not argue against that.

I agree the current lawsuits are the correct way to go, and I just read an informative rely by North4000 to you. My questions/comments were all theoretical as pulling a drug like this from the market would be a crime against humanity. That said, has the interference from the FDA and the courts provided that same result?

Thank you.

[Number sleven]

Kiwi, ISKB, I believe the infringment lawsuit is solid. I also accept the opinion of Marjac, Alm, and North about the strength of Marjac's suit. To me this discussion is purely for the sake of discussion. Kiwi, I can see where Amarin could be seen as liable if they choose not to supply the united states with an important drug. CVD patients would suffer. They are an Irish company. None of the suppliers of API are based in the US. Does the US court have jurisdiction over a foreign company if they are not doing business in the US?
This is not a loaded. I don't know the answer.
Sleven,