InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Lemmiwinks

07/28/21 7:05 PM

#348362 RE: The Canes #348361

It was someone going by the name Mitra that posted a lengthy analysis I believe
Hindukush did the follow up.
icon url

L0tsaluck2000

07/28/21 7:28 PM

#348365 RE: The Canes #348361

I think the evidence clearly suggests that posters on this board identified the statistical problem which was the impetus for the paper. The statisticians did the heavy lifting and it appears Bhatt's name was added to give credibility and greater attention.

It's important to remember the original paper was an old paper and the original authors, peer reviewers and years of readers failed to find the error. To presume the Amarin lawyers would have foreseen it or even that that issues would be key in the decision is silly.

JT's error was not pursuing the Rule 60 expeditiously.
icon url

sts66

07/30/21 5:43 PM

#348625 RE: The Canes #348361

I see others have answered so I won't repeat - don't know how you pin all the blame on JT though - I blame Covington. And I still say Mori was a sideshow, Kura was the most important as far as patents go, and Du screwed that up bad - Covington couldn't respond, never knew about it until Du had issued her decision and the cropped table showed up.