Amarin Corp Plc (AMRN)

[L0tsaluck2000]

I think the evidence clearly suggests that posters on this board identified the statistical problem which was the impetus for the paper. The statisticians did the heavy lifting and it appears Bhatt's name was added to give credibility and greater attention.

It's important to remember the original paper was an old paper and the original authors, peer reviewers and years of readers failed to find the error. To presume the Amarin lawyers would have foreseen it or even that that issues would be key in the decision is silly.

JT's error was not pursuing the Rule 60 expeditiously.