InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

rafunrafun

03/26/21 12:56 AM

#331401 RE: marjac #331396

On the next episode of 60-Minutes, stay tuned for an incredible story about how a relatively unknown attorney and a physician teamed up to take on injustice in the federal court system, perpetrated by clever deception of statistics and manipulation of data by a Generic drug company, which resulted in reinstatement of multiple patents for a cardiovascular drug
called Vascepa, owned by a biopharmaceutical company called Amarin, which was bought last week by Pfizer for a whopping $20 billion.
icon url

alm2

03/26/21 4:29 AM

#331403 RE: marjac #331396

Marjac / Hindukush
I for one have deeply considered the Rule 60 case as presented in the application
Although a lawyer and not a scientist the science is so very clearly set out - a logical route is established to quite simply render to ashes the various false premise that were invented in the gv case

- K and M do not on any scientific analysis support obviousness

It is akin to the observation of the eye in a flat landscape that the earth is flat - (the eye we know deceives )but the proposition can be made -

“all that I see is flat and so the earth must be “

Science established that this proposition is incorrect

Du saw the earth as flat - she was persuaded this was so by scientific mumbo jumbo
And thus Amarin sailed off the edge of the world (share price collapsed)

the case now presented by Marjac/ hindukush - evidenced by Jarvis propels the scientific case - as if Du is assisted into an orbit of the earth

she can now consider the truthful science -she can see it with her very own eyes -

The scientific case presented to her is now as convincing as looking out of the orbiter window and seeing the world beneath her for what is - round - not flat

Let truth prevail
Alm
icon url

HinduKush

03/26/21 9:41 AM

#331416 RE: marjac #331396

Kind words Marjac. I know the entire EPADI team wants justice for Amrn shareholders and the stock price to be restored justly. Whatever the outcome, it is important that when one sees justice perverted one should have the strength not just to speak out but act selflessly and recruit good people who believe likewise to act also. I am very proud of the way this board has done precisely that through enormous personal and financial sacrifices. IF we fail there will be some who say I told you so, but we will always sleep better knowing we didn't take it lying down. To do otherwise would be not just un-American, it would be cowardice.
HK
icon url

lizzy241

03/26/21 10:01 AM

#331421 RE: marjac #331396

marjac/HK, you are both amazing in intelligence and logical. Having both qualities is rare. Glad you are on our side, we'll never know why amarin doesn't want to have anything to do with rule 60.
icon url

biofalcon

03/26/21 11:41 AM

#331458 RE: marjac #331396

What is your vision on how a judge responds to these Rule 60s? Human nature says that anyone involved with making a decision that requires alot of time, procedures, thought, and writing does not take lightly to being accused of being wrong.
First instinct is to protect that decision. Say, ah yes perhaps the wrong evidence is not really all that made me decide this way.
Second instinct is to say, why did you not bring this to my attention earlier, I wasted all this time and effort, and now you are trying to make me look at it again? Get out of here!
Third, not an instinct, but a thought mixed with emotion. I am outraged by the party that presented this false evidence because it makes me look stupid, makes me look incompetent. I will throw down hammer and reverse my decision.
What percentage of Rule 60s succeed? And did you find any examples of the judges reactions you want to share.
Thanks
icon url

Meowza

03/26/21 8:11 PM

#331610 RE: marjac #331396



(that was the 6-packiest I could find)
icon url

xblkbk

03/26/21 9:13 PM

#331619 RE: marjac #331396

Mike Drop!!
icon url

massulo52

03/26/21 9:18 PM

#331621 RE: marjac #331396

Remember Amarin and the BOD are inept and can not direct or help there legal system...
icon url

cruyff22

03/26/21 9:42 PM

#331623 RE: marjac #331396

I believe it is not only vision that the lawyers lack, but intelligence as well. Just saying.
icon url

Bouf

03/26/21 9:56 PM

#331625 RE: marjac #331396

M—-

The problem you have is that obviousness is not a purely objective question. It has subjective elements that a trier of fact must evaluate and weigh based upon the evidence.

If the legal question depended on objective scientific facts, you would have a much stronger position. But it does not.

I’m a skeptic but I wish you good luck.??

B
icon url

tke458

03/27/21 7:02 AM

#331637 RE: marjac #331396

Don’t forget Wanda as well. Lol

Seriously, you all have put forth a tremendous effort.