I am a tad confused, as I read the posts in question, before they were deleted, and the share counts were discussed, not the share price.
In the absence of audited financial statements, filings to the SEC, free release of outstanding share counts from the transfer agent, etc., the number of shares has MUCH more to do with the relative value to each shareholder, than the share price.
Dilution of ownership is a major issue, and prior to the gag on the transfer agent in late August/early september, had occurred to the tune of at least 7.5 million shares from Jan 1 2006 to that point.
That is 19% dilution, all while IDWD was professing to have incredible sales growth, saying they were about to relase financials to prove it, pay a dividend (lots of peeps waiting on that one), etc. Does it look like someone was selling into a pump?? Yes.
So, with all due respect, the old canard of "that has already been discussed, and anyone can go back and read about it" is myopically rude at best, and smacks of attempts to conceal information from new traders.
Besides, these issues, discussed at length or not, have never been resolved. No independant verification exists to either prove Downs' claims, or disprove them.
So they are fair game to be discussed, re-posted, dissected, argued, or, most importantly, when making a decision to take the final step in silencing someone........easily ignored.
But when you think about how easily full disclosure and filings would shoot down theories of scams and fraud, resolve unanswererd issues, and allow the price of IDWD to move towards stated buyout prices, etc......to claim irrelevance is wrong.
LITO