Whoops, you're right.
I pulled up a 3 year chart and hit Sept of the wrong year.
Jan 14, '02 it was .0045
Sept 9, '02 it was .0011
Sept '03 it ranged from .007 down to .004
Sept 20, '04 it was .001
Mar 21, '05 it was still .001
Mar 28, '05 it was .005
This is what's called sub-penny.
IDS WAtcher wrote in Post # 20051 :
>>>This stock has never traded subpenny.
WOuld you care to retract that statement as a self-proclaimed
expert on IDWD? I'm looking right at the chart right now.
You said you'd been following this one for a few years.
I now find that hard to believe.
Sept 5, '05 it closed at .19
Sept 4, '06 it closed at 1.32
Sept 11, '06 it closed at 1.25
The difference between those two alone shows how insignificant
the argument was on Sept 5, '05. It obviously had little or
no effect. Today's range is .78 to .73 thus far.
It is more likely that we are in the midst of a dip which
has happened several times this year. It is more likely
we will see yet another rebound as the posted impropieties
both imagined and real about Downs don't seem to matter to
serious investors interested in making profit.
Looking at the chart, there's been 4 dips and 4 surges thus
far this year. That's proven opportunity.
If a serious minded investor is making money, why should
they care what the gossip is, old or new?
In my mind only a short would be arguing at this juncture
and that's assuming the short is a serious investor.
I'm still waiting for a solid good pink that's fully reporting
and is completely transparent where there's no lying or
misdirection occurring. I'd buy it.
But wait, it would be on the Amex if a pink could do all that.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
