I do believe matters of mathematics are absolute and wrong interpretations of mathematics are absolutely wrong. This will not go unnoticed by the bench of three or the bench en blanc. A part of me thinks it goes en blanc. While this is better than rolling the dice and not getting a good judge panel...I cringe a little. But another part of me thinks if goes en blanc....it’s cause they gonna bitch slap the ruling. Lem.
RAF—if it was just a pure math mistake RE: Mori, rather than a point of statistical interpretation, it would be in the principal brief, one would think. Interpretation of the results of a scientific lipid study is not within the ken of the general public. Hence it would ordinarily be presented by an expert in the discipline.
That is where I am getting hung up. Any insight on this appreciated.