Replies to post #281704 on Amarin Corp Plc (AMRN)

[rafunrafun]

I think the question is twofold:

1. Is there a question about the interpretation of statistical data? From what I understand, the answer is NO, its black & white, Du got it wrong.

2. Is the interpretation of statistical data within the realm of understanding of a district judge or must have it been spelled out for her (explain WHY 2+2×2=6, not 8)? What what I read here, a high school kid should have known this. A district court judge is way above a high school kid.

Other opinions?

[alm2]

Bouf ... but would it be expected to be in the ken of a judge - judge Du ?
That’s the point ... she is the person who is required to make a correct interpretation of the evidence - not to make mistakes of her own volition which then allow her to reach a flawed judgement relying on her own mistakes
Let us say the evidence in a case showed that a bank manager alleged to have stolen money in fact did not .. the evidence from his 3 bank account show he only had 3000 dollars in them - account 1 1000 account 2 500 account 3 1500
Du then does the maths - a b c accounts she adds up to 3,000,000 simple error of maths - and directs the jury (in Amarins case she is the judge and jury)- on basis of clear evidence of 3,000,000 in accused accounts and they convict -
Error - Oh let’s just ignore it in the appeal ???
Can’t be so

I use an extreme example to emphasise the point
If there is a clear error of interpretation of fact the FC must be allowed to visit it
Alm