Replies to post #599703 on Mr Cooper Group Inc (COOP)

[Bizreader]

Alice's claim that she will be muted doesn't amount to an emergency in my world. I don't think her efforts to establish legal, moral, or ethical grounds upon which to delay our distributions is established in the eyes of Judge Walrath or any other judge that has a lick of common sense.

There is a better time and place for her possibly righteous, yet tardy and generally poorly timed, approach. She has been denied previously as well.

Imho

[goodietime]

Pg 15/24
Item 22.
22. "At the heart of the Appeal is a desire to give members of Class 19 the bargain for which
they voted and were promised they would receive. They voted for anti-dilution and their fiduciary, the
Trust, disregarded the Plan and diluted them by placing the Underwriters’ claims in Class 19. It is
dismaying, particularly in the post-Madoff era, for a Trustee to show no concern for its charter documents
or beneficiaries, and for the Bankruptcy Court – a federal judge – to read in open court documentation
showing that the Trust violated its charter (i.e., the Plan) and condone the Trust’s malfeasance. There are
thousands of retail members of Class 19 all over the world who follow the Debtors’ bankruptcy cases,
listened to the Hearing, and expressed outrage that the Bankruptcy Court (inappropriately) applied a
technicality to protect the Trust rather than ordering the Trust to fashion a remedy that would not violate
the Plan. America’s federal judiciary has long been regarded as the most respectable of the three branches
of government, and at a time when politicians and other public figures are lightly esteemed it is in the
interest of federal judges to maintain that standing. By neutralizing the Bankruptcy Court’s ability to
eviscerate Movant’s Appeal this Court can mitigate the damage done to Class 19 and show retail investors
who were disappointed by the Bankruptcy Court’s handling of the Objection that the federal judiciary has
integrity and can police itself."