InvestorsHub Logo

la_trader

10/29/19 12:43 PM

#95149 RE: N4longterm #95145

omfg. hilarious chit. there was no SEC enforced "relegation to greys" as an SEC initiated action.

just amazes me how this fake info is made up and spewed out.

SEC taking "no further action" means "you did nothing wrong". period.

imiloa

10/29/19 2:13 PM

#95180 RE: N4longterm #95145

N4, yep.
thus, my concern FINRA might be dubious this time around, too.

mark will probably need to convince them
that he has a legit biz plan now
with legit content/IP
with legit chance of future revenues
or FINRA will just laugh and deny the 211.

from that perspective,
if the 211 does get approved,
suggests mark might really have something to peddle this round.

time will tell.
i'm fine waiting to see how it plays out.
been so many years already...

Just1MoreUpTick

10/29/19 2:52 PM

#95188 RE: N4longterm #95145

Exactly correct!!!

WRONG! There was wrong doing, thus the suspension. They just said they were not going to take FURTHER action, believing that relegating MIKP to the greys would suffice.