Replies to post #63860 on NaturalShrimp Inc (SHMP)

[November61]

10, 20 or 30 % mortality is not important.

After all it is part of NATURE to die.

BTW 0 % mortality is quite suspicious, imo, like not tasting iodine????

Instead, it would be great to know the reasons of their death.

Too crowded?
Water leaking?
Food poisoning?
Water filtering not efficient?
or simply sharing the tanks with other species eating the shrimps.

Clarity please, like their claimed water.

[DISTATRADE]

Imo the important part of this message is “90% survival rate”. That’s great news in my book! I’m buying and holding!
I’ve been in for 9 months now, and have no intention on selling unless something drastic changes in my original DD.
Buy-Sell -Hold on your own DD!
Go $ SHMP $ GLTYA

[Steady_T]

Interesting, when I talked to Paul it was 90+ % survival rate.

Since the total harvest hasn't occurred he said that the exact number wasn't known so he used 90 as a minimum survival rate, recognizing that it was likely higher.

But then I didn't get the email, so I have to go with what I was told.

Even more interesting that the complaint is that IR must be using an exact number when before the complaint was that there was no way to know what the number was without a complete harvest.