InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 110
Posts 19074
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 01/03/2014

Re: JoshTaeger post# 63857

Tuesday, 07/16/2019 12:41:30 PM

Tuesday, July 16, 2019 12:41:30 PM

Post# of 113610
PR-Paul's email literally stated a 90% survival rate! Not "or more", again, it stated 90% as the rate!
SHMP is blind if 90% is "no visible mortality"! Imagine if that was people! Losing 10% is not visible?
Yes, as you said, the phrase is ambiguous and meaningless! But that's the way SHMP likes things!

JoshTaeger Member Level Tuesday, 07/16/19 12:32:10 PM
Re: Steady_T post# 63853
Post # 63857 of 63860

No, it can't be spun that way. "No visible mortality" is so ambiguous it's virtually meaningless.

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent SHMP News