InvestorsHub Logo

BWIS

05/15/19 4:00 PM

#227503 RE: beartrap12 #227498

Smokescreen justification. SMH. 4yrs ago when stock was $12 and pfs event count was just around the corner. I can almost see abetas cancer market analysis in my mind.

Oh wait ASCO is just around the corner and who drops back by to start talking cancer market revenues?

On and on it goes.

maverick_1

05/15/19 4:03 PM

#227505 RE: beartrap12 #227498

“ I fact checked everything they wrote that could be fact checked without a subpoena and they were all lies. Re BearTrap to BWIS”

How anyone, especially a NWBO shareholder? still? can NOT see that the Phase V “report” (Oct 2015! see ALL the commentary then: https://investorshub.advfn.com/NorthWest-Biotherapeutics-Inc-NWBO-3441/?NextStart=45833 ) was one of a long series of successful HIT pieces which IIRC began with Seeking Alpha’s Rick Pearson hit piece ......... truly underscores the level of depravity here!

Thanks BearTrap for ALL of your postings especially from the yearS of attending and posting your notes to many NWBO Annual Shreholding Meetings and interfacing with the entire seasoned NWBO management team.

DIFFERENT STROKES FOR DIFFERENT FOLKS

exwannabe

05/15/19 4:18 PM

#227514 RE: beartrap12 #227498

I fact checked everything they [Phase 5] wrote that could be fact checked without a subpoena and they were all lies.


I will call BS on that. There was plenty of documented material in the report that was easily verifiable.

The records on that company that Malik ran the shares through could be found easily. And the shares going to them and being sold on the backside could be found.

The patents in question are still assigned to Four-M despite the loan they collateralized being ancient history.

One could pull the history on the Israeli Doc treating patients with DCVax-L and see he had his license pulled for improperly experimenting on humans.

All I remember from this board was a bunch of posts asserting it was all lies, without a single concrete example.

One can argue that it was highly biased and opinionated. But the presented facts looked fairly correct.