Replies to post #9317 on NaturalShrimp Inc (SHMP)

[ALL-IN888]

Another Round of Dilution!!!! Warned y'all to get Out yesterday with a profit before this POS really Tanks hard!!!!!

[ALL-IN888]

These Crook owners are just making it their personal ATM machine!!! Geezus

[Matt1963]

Here's what I'd like to know (and I am not bashing as already holding a rather large bag on this dubious company), but if this tech is so marketable and the potential income streams deriving from it, so huge and bountiful, why are they STILL struggling to raise finance and needing to resort back to the EFA with GSH? Surely VC's and Business Angels would be queing up to get in on this disruptive technology if it were THAT good. What am I missing here and why if this process is so good and clean, I am still smelling something very fishy?

[davidsan]

The 2nd registration statement already happened 12/14/18! This appears to clearly be old news, despite its date.

This media person in this apparent 12/20/18 blurb refers to a 2nd registration statement (S-1) following the 1st one on 9/7/18, as such I believe their use of the word "will" is incorrect and they should have written "recently has", for the 12/14/18 S-1 was the 2nd registration statement filed under the 8/21/18 agreement, and it already has recently been filed. And the explanation in this apparent 12/20/18 blurb supports the 2nd S-1 not a 3rd. The confusion may be because we have not yet had the "effective date" of the 2nd S-1 confirmed. This reporter appears to have been a bit too casual with his reporting, assuming the 12/20/18 date is correct at all.